fameatop wrote:
Balancing a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with another, twenty-three year-old Alan, paused in front of a first floor flat in the colony.
A. Balancing a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with another
B. Having a balance of a pizza with one hand and gripping a six-pack of carton of soft drinks with the other
C. Balancing a pizza with one hand and gripping a pack of six soft drink carton with the other
D. Being balanced a pizza with one hand and gripping a six-pack carton of soft drinks with the another
E. Having balanced a pizza with one hand and having gripped a six-pack carton of soft drinks with the other
I have a doubt in this question, posted by "Marcab"
Use of "another" vs "the other"
"The other", which means "second of two" is correct in this sentence. So options left are B,C, & E.
Option B can be ruled out because it does not maintain parallelism between Perfect participle & Present participle
Option C - maintains parallelism but a small error with "Six soft drink corner"
Option E - As per Marcab & many others this option is correct but i have a doubt in this option.
Although option E maintain parallelism using Perfect participle but perfect participle is used to indicate "Completed actions" and not "Continuing actions". If we use perfect participle in this case, it will mean that "When Alan paused in front of the door, he was neither holding the pizza nor holding the soft drink carton". If we use perfect participle it will change the intended meaning.
Waiting for Inputs from Experts..
Fame, I thought about the option E for a while and came to the conclusion that option E is indeed incorrect.
Consider the following 2 sentences:
1) Having finished his quota of bowling spell, Ishant came out of the ground and settled into the dressing room.
2) Having finished his quota of bowling spell, Ishant started rubbing the ball for a better swing.
Choice 2 is logically incorrect and I hope you know why .. It doesn't make sense for a fast bowler to shine the ball for your colleague, especially when he is done with his spell.
Choice 1 is correct because that's common sense.
Same thing goes into this particular sentence. Since, Alan has balanced the pizza with one hand and gripped the drinks with other, there is no logical reason for him to pause in front of the flat. Yeah, some people will say maybe he might have to take out the keys from the pocket or have to ring the bell, that's the reason but that's not the logical follow up. These are pure assumptions and no natural logical flow. Opponents may say that his friend was already waiting at the door for him to come over and place the goodies at the table so no reason for Alan to pause at the door.
IMO, all the options are incorrect, and if this sentence is a copy of an official one, someone misunderstood the logic to do so.