It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 09:44

# Happening Now:

Alleviate MBA app anxiety! Come to Chat Room #2

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Bank depositors in the U.S. are all financially protected

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Bank depositors in the U.S. are all financially protected [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2005, 21:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Bank depositors in the U.S. are all financially protected against bank failure because the government insures all individuals' bank deposits. An economist argues that this insurance is partly responsible for the high rate of bank failures, since it removes from depositors any financial incentive to find out whether the bank that holds their money is secure against failure. If depositors were more selective, then banks would need to be secure in order to compete for depositors' money.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?

A. Before the government started to insure depositors against bank failure, there was a lower rate of bank failure than there is now.
B. When the government did not insure deposits, frequent bank failures occurred as a result of depositors' fears of losing money in bank failures.
C. Surveys show that a significant proportion of depositors are aware that their deposits are insured by the government.
D. There is an upper limit on the amount of an individual's deposit that the governement will insure, but very few individuals' deposits exceed this limit.
E. The security of a bank against failure depends on the percentage of its assets that are loaned out and also on how much risk its loans involve.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes Math Revolution Discount Codes
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1709

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2005, 21:54
B clearly weakens because it mentions the incidents of banks faliure before the implementation of government protection.

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 00:40
B for me.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Location: Basel

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 03:58
B ...as stated by Himalaya

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 05:20
A & C strengthen D is irrelevent & E doesnt talk about depositers

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 482

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 07:16
I thought B too...
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2005, 21:20
OA is B

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2005, 07:25
Can anyone explain further why B......why as a result of depositor's fear....that sounds odd!
_________________

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5039

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2005, 07:40
Can anyone explain further why B......why as a result of depositor's fear....that sounds odd!

The passage argues that because the banks do not need to be responsible its customer's deposits, it therefore does not care if it is secure or not. A failure would just mean closing down the bank, and not incurring any lawsuits from its customers to get their money back.

However, choice B debunks that myth. It says when the government did not insure dposits, the banks are failing possibly because their customers are all afreaid of losing money, and so less deposits are made. This will reduce the amount of cash the bank has holding that can be diverted for calculated investments to generate revenue etc...

Kudos [?]: 425 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2005, 07:43
Thanks , that explains!
_________________

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

28 Aug 2005, 07:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 3 23 Dec 2007, 07:54
Bank depositors in the United States are allfinancially 0 23 Mar 2012, 12:16
Bank depositors in the United States are all financially 0 29 Jun 2013, 09:15
Bank depositors in the United States are all financially protected aga 0 10 Jun 2017, 11:25
Bank depositors in the US are all financially protected 0 29 Jun 2013, 09:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by