It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 15:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 07:34
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not reduce the number of young people who smoke. They know that cigarettes exist and they know how to get them. They do not need the advertisements to supply that information.

The above argument would be most weakened if which of the following were true?

(A) Seeing or hearing an advertisement for a product tends to increase people’s desire for that product.
(B) Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will cause an increase in advertisements in places where cigarettes are sold.
(C) Advertisements in the mass media have been an exceedingly large part of the expenditures of the tobacco companies.
(D) Those who oppose cigarette use have advertised against it in the mass media ever since cigarettes were found to be harmful.
(E) Older people tend to be less influenced by mass-media advertisements than younger people tend to be.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 279

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Location: New York
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 07:39
A ...need to make a connection between advertisements increasing one's desire to smoke.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 07:40
Answer is A, because it fits well. Answers BCDE contains not relevant info. It's a really easy question

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 07:45
Please can you explain why not E..

If younger people are affected by the advertisement in some way(say positvely) wont the number of young people who smoke decrease..so does'nt it weaken the argument?

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 07:54
A 2.

E's old people are irrelevant. it is about the banning, not about the old vs young.

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 20:13
ayushi wrote:
Please can you explain why not E..

If younger people are affected by the advertisement in some way(say positvely) wont the number of young people who smoke decrease..so does'nt it weaken the argument?


E is out of scope.

The conclusion is: Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not reduce the number of young people who smoke.

Anything related to older people is irrelevant.
It has to be A.

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2006, 20:16
Clear A. E is irrelevent here.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2006, 09:37
ayushi wrote:
Please can you explain why not E..

If younger people are affected by the advertisement in some way(say positvely) wont the number of young people who smoke decrease..so does'nt it weaken the argument?



Premise:
Younger people don't need more information about cigarette.They know about it.

Conclusion: They do not need the advertisements to supply the info.

Weaken argument is A

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2006, 11:53
A also.

A (if true) directly associates advertisements with desire for a product.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: TX
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2006, 12:16
Late but A.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2006, 09:16
(A)

Ayushi - Please read my signature :(

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 124

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2006, 13:08
Yeah A

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 94

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2006, 13:56
I'm sorry for the late OA..busy with work!

Well the OA is A...

Sorry dont have the OE.. :?

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Current Student
User avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2006, 08:25
Late, but (A). How many times have you seen a Haagen Daz commercial only to later pick up a bucket of the stuff the next time you stop by the local am/pm?

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2006, 11:11
straight A

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Oct 2006, 12:11
Another one for A

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 29 Oct 2006, 12:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.