aniket16c wrote:
e-gmat or GMATNinja request you to rectify my understanding
In POE, step I narrowed down the prospective answer to A and E.
I could not identify the redundancy error in option A.
In case of option E, I thought that the phrase, "fragments rejoined" alters the meaning. From my perspective, the phrases presents a meaning that the fragments themselves rejoined.
In case of option A, I could not find anything unusual aside from the passive tense usage.
Hence, providing a higher weightage to "meaning alteration" I decided to choose option A.
My questions are:
1. I would appreciate any guidance on how to spot a redundancy error, as I fail to stop such error number of times
2. Please clarify my confusion regarding the meaning change in option E.
Thank you.
An answer contains a redundancy if it contains two components that play the exact same role. For example, I could write, "Dave's toddler suffered a terrible injury,
after which, he resolved to stop reenacting climactic battle scene from
Game of Thrones with his small children." Or I could write, "Dave's toddler suffered a terrible injury;
subsequently, he resolved to stop reenacting climactic battle scene from
Game of Thrones with his small children."
But I'd never write, "Dave's toddler suffered a terrible injury, after which, he subsequently resolved to stop reenacting climactic battle scene from
Game of Thrones with his small children," because "after which" and "subsequently" are conveying identical bits of information.
In this question, the question-writer hints that "subsequently" is unnecessary, as some of the answer choices contain the word, and some don't, and nothing is lost by deleting "subsequently" because
every answer choice contains "after which."
As for concerns about changing the meaning, think of it this way: you are given five sentences. You want to pick the one that is the best option. If (E) has a different meaning than (A), but (E) is clearer -- or if (A) contains a mistake -- then (E) is a better sentence.
I hope that helps!