Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 08:18

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Because of a recent drought in Florida during the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 203
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 220 [1] , given: 7

Because of a recent drought in Florida during the [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jan 2010, 01:26
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

63% (01:42) correct 37% (00:41) wrong based on 61 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Because of a recent drought in Florida during the orange-growing season, the
price of oranges this season will be three times the usual price. This will drive up
the cost of producing orange juice and thus push up the price of orange juice for
the consumer.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) The recent drought was not as severe as scientists predicted.
(B) States other than Florida also supply oranges to orange juice manufacturers.
(C) Other ingredients are used in the production of orange juice.
(D) Last year the price of oranges was actually lower than the average price over
the past ten years.
(E) The price of oranges will eventually be $0.48 per crate. _________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think you can,you can If you think you can't,you are right. If you have any questions you can ask an expert New! Intern Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 22 Location: Hyderabad Schools: ISB, UCLA,Darden Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 1 Re: CR Resource [#permalink] Show Tags 29 Jan 2010, 08:30 Conclusion: The cost of producing orange juice will be higher which in turn will push up the cost of orange juice To weaken this conclusion, we have to negatively impact the conclusion. Because of a recent drought in Florida during the orange-growing season, the price of oranges this season will be three times the usual price. This will drive up the cost of producing orange juice and thus push up the price of orange juice for the consumer. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above? (A) The recent drought was not as severe as scientists predicted. This is not related to the cost of producing orange juice. (B) States other than Florida also supply oranges to orange juice manufacturers. This seems to be the most probable answer. Assuming that states other than Florida didn't experience drought and the cost of oranges is the same elsewhere, the cost of producing orange juice would not be much impacted. (C) Other ingredients are used in the production of orange juice. The major ingredient of orange juice is orange. So, the cost of other ingredients is irrelevant. (D) Last year the price of oranges was actually lower than the average price over the past ten years. : Though the cost of oranges was actually lower,the price will be thrice the price now. The new price cannot be assumed to be lower/higher from this choice. (E) The price of oranges will eventually be$0.48 per crate. : We cannot assume the cost of orange juice from this.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2009
Posts: 359
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 389 [0], given: 47

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jan 2010, 11:43
mojorising800 wrote:
Because of a recent drought in Florida during the orange-growing season, the
price of oranges this season will be three times the usual price. This will drive up
the cost of producing orange juice and thus push up the price of orange juice for
the consumer.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
(A) The recent drought was not as severe as scientists predicted.
(B) States other than Florida also supply oranges to orange juice manufacturers.
(C) Other ingredients are used in the production of orange juice.
(D) Last year the price of oranges was actually lower than the average price over
the past ten years.
(E) The price of oranges will eventually be \$0.48 per crate.

B seems to be a clear winner as it gives an alternative source for oranges!
_________________

Cheers!
JT...........
If u like my post..... payback in Kudos!!

|Do not post questions with OA|Please underline your SC questions while posting|Try posting the explanation along with your answer choice|
|For CR refer Powerscore CR Bible|For SC refer Manhattan SC Guide|

~~Better Burn Out... Than Fade Away~~

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 325
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 14

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jan 2010, 20:02
Clear B
_________________

Always tag your question

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 120
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 268 [1] , given: 172

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 10:41
1
KUDOS
to complete this question:

OA is B.

I got this question in one of the princeton review papers.
_________________

I will greatly appreciate your KUDOS my friends!

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 185
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 20

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jan 2011, 18:56
1
KUDOS
B. Easy one.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 194
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 15

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jan 2011, 09:10
Additional supply provides that the prices will not rise in Florida.

B
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Mar 2011, 10:08
garbage question none of the options are conclusive.
if taken literally, c is the least bad ans.
it says 'Other ingredients are used in the production of orange juice'
and not 'Other ingredients are ALSO used in the production of orange juice'
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 903
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 359 [0], given: 123

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Mar 2011, 22:19
I got two answers C and B

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 117
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2011, 01:44
B..
Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 04:08
Not good question. B and C are confusing. It is also possible that other states also have drought and "also" is missing in C... Not real GMAT level question.
Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Resource [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 04:20
additional source of supply means no shortage of oranges and this will lead to stability in prices ( purely economics : demand supply graph) . the only answer that leads to this conclusion is B
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 1
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.96
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 21

Re: Because of a recent drought in Florida during the [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Aug 2015, 01:18
I marked B as wrong for following reason:
States other than Florida also supply oranges to orange juice manufacturers, But the % contribution of other states v/s that by Florida state is not given.
For eg. if other states contribute 5% & Florida contributes 95% of oranges, prices will go high.
and if other states contrubute 90% & Florida contributes 10%, then prices might not go high or may even then rise.

Can't really figure out error in my reasoning!
Re: Because of a recent drought in Florida during the   [#permalink] 02 Aug 2015, 01:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
10 RATT Race: During and immediately after periods of drought 14 14 Jun 2016, 23:45
14 Because of the recent transformation of the market 15 19 Sep 2016, 00:49
Peter: Because the leaves of mildly drought-stressed plants 1 23 Jul 2014, 07:30
17 Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, 21 01 Oct 2016, 02:09
9 Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, 17 07 Feb 2016, 12:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Because of a recent drought in Florida during the

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.