GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 29 Jan 2020, 14:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.92
Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 29 Sep 2017, 09:15
4
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:16) correct 32% (01:27) wrong based on 247 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single party has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed.

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed.

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed.

Source : Jamboree

_________________
The thing about privilege is.. you often don't recognize your own !!!

Originally posted by cubs on 28 Sep 2017, 17:03.
Last edited by cubs on 29 Sep 2017, 09:15, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8322
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 10:15
3
sunny91 wrote:
cubs wrote:
Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single party has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed.

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed.

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed.

chetan2u, Broall aisle,
Sir, can u kindly help me on the above. We have since, so a present perfect ( has held) makes sense. Also, we have a time indicator, so past perfect can work fine. But my only objection with the OA is why do we have the underlined part as coalition cabinets had to be formed.
If the structure would be- coalition cabinets had been formed-->this makes sense. Or coalition cabinets have been formed--> this makes sense.
Had to be formed means are we referring to a past event or a possibility of a future event (unlikely). I am not able to get the meaning.

Hi..

It is a random sentence picked up by som e source and a question has been made on it. This is the most dangerous thing about institute forming SC questions..

Only reason for A to be correct is HAS HELD..
but 'coalition cabinets had to be formed' itself is incomplete.. WHEN?

it should be " .... has to be formed every time."
_________________
Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 23
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.85
WE: Operations (Consumer Electronics)
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 18:10
1
1
Concepts tested: Tenses
A – correct.
B - There is a tense mismatch between ‘had held’ and ‘were to be’. Exactly as you said.
C - Tense mismatch between ‘held’ and ‘had been’
D - The past tense ‘held’ is incorrectly paired with the participle ‘being’.
E - There is a mismatch between ‘was holding’ and ‘were formed’.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 912
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 21:19
1
cubs wrote:
Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single party has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed.

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed.

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed.

Hello cubs - Please let me know if this helps to clarify your doubt.

Let's first try to understand what is the author trying to say:

Because of XYZ reason ==> No Single Party has held a majority in the parliament.

From the above sentence, we need a Present Perfect Tense - Because no one has held majority since 19th century, furthermore as this is the only event which was highlighted we cannot use past perfect tense. Also, the use of simple past tense and past continues tense is incorrect over here.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed. ==> Correct Tense and meaning

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed. ==> Usage of "had" is incorrect as there is only one event here.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed. ==> Use of Simpe Past "held" is incorrect

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed. ==> ==> Use of Simpe Past "held" is incorrect and "being formed" alters the meaning

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed. ==>Use of past continuous tense is incorrect.

Hence - A
_________________
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.92
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 18:05
Can someone explain why B was rejected.
_________________
The thing about privilege is.. you often don't recognize your own !!!
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 77
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.92
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 18:06
B - There is a tense mismatch between ‘had held’ and ‘were to be’.
Is this the issue?
_________________
The thing about privilege is.. you often don't recognize your own !!!
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 226
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 07:45
[quote="cubs"]Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single party has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed.

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed.

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed.

chetan2u, Broall aisle,
Sir, can u kindly help me on the above. We have since, so a present perfect ( has held) makes sense. Also, we have a time indicator, so past perfect can work fine. But my only objection with the OA is why do we have the underlined part as coalition cabinets had to be formed.
If the structure would be- coalition cabinets had been formed-->this makes sense. Or coalition cabinets have been formed--> this makes sense.
Had to be formed means are we referring to a past event or a possibility of a future event (unlikely). I am not able to get the meaning.
Manager
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 226
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 10:47
chetan2u wrote:
sunny91 wrote:
cubs wrote:
Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single party has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(A) has held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had to be formed.

(B) had held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were to be formed.

(C) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets had been formed.

(D) held a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets being formed.

(E) was holding a majority in parliament since the 19th century, and coalition cabinets were formed.

chetan2u, Broall aisle,
Sir, can u kindly help me on the above. We have since, so a present perfect ( has held) makes sense. Also, we have a time indicator, so past perfect can work fine. But my only objection with the OA is why do we have the underlined part as coalition cabinets had to be formed.
If the structure would be- coalition cabinets had been formed-->this makes sense. Or coalition cabinets have been formed--> this makes sense.
Had to be formed means are we referring to a past event or a possibility of a future event (unlikely). I am not able to get the meaning.

Hi..

It is a random sentence picked up by som e source and a question has been made on it. This is the most dangerous thing about institute forming SC questions..

Only reason for A to be correct is HAS HELD..
but 'coalition cabinets had to be formed' itself is incomplete.. WHEN?

it should be " .... has to be formed every time."

Thanks Chetan2u, a lot.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Posts: 23
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.7
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2018, 11:00
SANAM (some, any, none = no, all, more/ most) depends on the context and the logic. Normally, if the noun is plural, verbb is plural, and if noun is singular, verb is singular.
I eliminate the wrong options based on " since the 19th century".
Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2019
Posts: 5
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2019, 08:09
I only took the usage of "Has" with the continuity "since". It neither be "was" nor "Had"
Re: Because of the multi-party system in the Netherlands, no single   [#permalink] 24 Nov 2019, 08:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by