GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

 It is currently 23 May 2018, 03:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore,

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 15 Oct 2017, 10:15
3
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

37% (01:19) correct 63% (01:36) wrong based on 164 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

Originally posted by talk2pk on 10 Sep 2009, 20:21.
Last edited by abhimahna on 15 Oct 2017, 10:15, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Affiliations: Consortium (CGSM.org), NSHMBA
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 934
Location: New Haven
Schools: Yale SOM Class of 2012
WE 1: Investment Banking Summer Associate (Boutique tech M&A)
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2009, 20:53
4
KUDOS
talk2pk wrote:
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

the best way to do this one is to diagram everything you're given in the problem
they tell you that if it doesn't increase by 10%, it will go bankrupt. this is diagrammed as:

(1) if (not)10% -> then bankrupt.

next it says if 10% is possible, then 20% is possible. this is diagrammed as:

10% possible -> then 20% possible

next, you should always look at the converse of statements, as that will usually be the key to unlocking the problem. the converse of this statement is:

(2) if 20% not possible -> 10% not possible

now you have everything you need. if you add equation 1 to the end of equation 2, you will see that E is true:

if 20% not possible ->10 % not possible -> then bankrupt

_________________
Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 78
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2009, 01:15
talk2pk wrote:
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

the best way to do this one is to diagram everything you're given in the problem
they tell you that if it doesn't increase by 10%, it will go bankrupt. this is diagrammed as:

(1) if (not)10% -> then bankrupt.

next it says if 10% is possible, then 20% is possible. this is diagrammed as:

10% possible -> then 20% possible

next, you should always look at the converse of statements, as that will usually be the key to unlocking the problem. the converse of this statement is:

(2) if 20% not possible -> 10% not possible

now you have everything you need. if you add equation 1 to the end of equation 2, you will see that E is true:

if 20% not possible ->10 % not possible -> then bankrupt

I was confused beteen B and C altough none seemed 100% correct. Nice explanation.
_________________

Consider kudos for good post.

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 401
Schools: Simon '16 (M)
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2011, 03:55
talk2pk wrote:
Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, Inc., must increase productivity, 10 percent over the course of the next two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them also be true?

(A) It is only Quore’s production structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the market.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
(C) If the market had not been transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to avoid bankruptcy.
(D) Because of the transformation of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over the next two years.
(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.

Premise: Recent transformation forced Quore Inc. to increase productivity by 10% over two years or it will certainly go bankrupt.
Premise: 10% productivity increase means 20% productivity increase can be achieved too.

I chose B.
(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
Quore needs only 10% to avoid bankruptcy. So if it achieves 20% then it will certainly not go bankrupt.

But OA is E. How come? Help.
_________________

My dad once said to me: Son, nothing succeeds like success.

Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 188
Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2011, 04:43
IMO B..
What is OA?

(B) Quore will not go bankrupt if it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.
If it increases productivity by 10 percent over the next two years, Quore inc will not go bankrupted. Thus 20% productivity increase should hurt not going bankruptcy

(E) If a 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.
If 20 percent productivity increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt. This looked like an extreme statement where it says even if Quore Inc achieved 10% productivity increase but not 20%, it should go bankrupt.
_________________

Cheers,
Varun

If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 188
Location: India
WE 1: 3.75 IT
WE 2: 1.0 IT
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2011, 08:58
Surely need some help here to understand the answer.
_________________

Cheers,
Varun

If you like my post, give me KUDOS!!

Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 40
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.65
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2011, 14:24
1
KUDOS
I think statement B is wrong because nowhere it is mentioned in the stimulus that if the company achieves 20 % productivity increase then it will not go bankrupt. In the stimulus it just says that it will not go bankrupt if 20 % is unattainable. here is a difference between "Achieving" and "Attaining" So the correct answer is "E"
Intern
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Nov 2011, 07:37
The reason why B is wrong is simply due to the word "certainly".
The stimulus says that the company will certainly go bankrupt if it fails to increase its productivity by 10%.
If it achieves, let's say, 20% productivity increase, this only means that the company will not "certainly" go bankrupt, but it could still be likely.
The kicker in this one is that "not certainly" is the opposite of "certainly", not "not".

Cheers!
Manager
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 210
Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2011, 16:02
i was confused between C and E, but I see why E is correct so +1 for E
_________________

Sky is the limit

Intern
Status: The game in on..
Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Concentration: Technology, Operations
GMAT Date: 05-23-2012
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2012, 21:44
Even i made a mistake by choosing [highlight]B[/highlight] ...

as some one quoted earlier ... "CERTAINLY" in the argument makes a big impact.. whereas the answer choice says that bankruptcy "WILL HAPPEN" ....

phew... minute logic ..!! LSAT CRs rock...
_________________

YNWA #LFC

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2685
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 May 2018, 08:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Because of the recent transformation of the market. Quore,   [#permalink] 12 May 2018, 08:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by