It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 17:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 236
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2012, 06:29
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

43% (01:57) correct 57% (01:12) wrong based on 204 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by nelz007 on 20 Nov 2012, 08:19, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 218
Location: India
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GPA: 3
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2012, 06:48
nelz007 wrote:
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.

IMO D

...... higher court to which they can appeal if their case is .....
higher court is noun to be modified....
they refers to employee...

_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3972
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2012, 07:44
2
KUDOS
First thing to note is that the plaintiffs have cases of their own and not a single common case.

A that they can appeal to when their cases are ------- The use of the present tense ‘are decided’ is not in appropriate since the appeals will be done well after the decision.

(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been ---- the best choice.

(C) for appealing if their case has been --- ‘their case’ is wrong
(D) To which they can appeal if their case is -----‘their case’ is wrong
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been --- absurd meaning saying that their cases can apple.

_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 236
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2012, 08:20
To which to appeal sounds a bit awkward but grammatically its correct. OA is B.
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 878
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2012, 04:17
Whats wrong with A was debating between A and B
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Current Student
Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 70
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2012, 21:36
1
KUDOS
Modified the original question, option A was incorrect in the original one.

nelz007 wrote:
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.

The trick is that the sentence refers to the plaintiffs, the initial clause is just filler.

So the meat of the sentence is, "Because the Supreme Court has ruled X, plaintiffs in such cases fear that THEY will have no higher court blah blah"

Therefore, the correct option should be in plural form, C & D are out.

E says "that their cases can appeal" that's wrong. The cases are not appealing, the plaintiffs are..

A starts off on the correct note but ends with "when their cases are". In this case the use of "have been" is warranted since we are talking about something that will have an impact on the present
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10157
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2013, 15:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Posts: 18
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-27-2014
GPA: 3.2
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2013, 18:11
i also fell for Option D. option B was sounding awkward - to which to appeal...
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10157
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 03:33
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in   [#permalink] 28 Jul 2015, 03:33
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 The Supreme Court has ruled that universities must allow the armed for 7 22 Jun 2017, 02:03
8 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that 11 31 May 2016, 07:35
1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 4 07 Nov 2012, 09:21
9 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 7 09 Sep 2016, 06:41
46 Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution 16 18 Mar 2017, 09:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by