GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 23:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: EnterMBA (https://www.facebook.com/entermba)
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 148
Location: India
GRE 1: Q790 V710
GPA: 3.3
WE: Editorial and Writing (Education)
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2014, 22:58
1
Being is typically not used as a modifier on the GMAT (except to denote a cause-effect relationship, but even this usage is rare). In the given question, "being" can be eliminated without changing the meaning.
"Being" can be used thus:
Being angry will not get you anywhere.
He is being treated at the X hospital.
In these sentences, you cannot remove "being" without changing the meaning or making the sentence illogical.

"Playing basketball and tired of studying, John has done good in the sport."
The modifiers are fine. "good" should be "well". ("good" is an adjective. You need the adverb "well.")
_________________

--Prasad
EnterMBA

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1162
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2015, 07:43
x2suresh wrote:
First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation.

I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff

"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."

For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense."


Can someone throw some light on this aspect of present perfect tense.
If you take whole life as an event then you can say i have lived in x,y and z even if u don't live in it now.
What does this exactly mean? Why she has is correct in this question?
_________________

The only time you can lose is when you give up. Try hard and you will suceed.
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

http://gmatclub.com/forum/rules-for-posting-in-verbal-gmat-forum-134642.html
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources.


My posts
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beauty-of-coordinate-geometry-213760.html#p1649924
http://gmatclub.com/forum/calling-all-march-april-gmat-takers-who-want-to-cross-213154.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/possessive-pronouns-200496.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/double-negatives-206717.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-greatest-integer-function-223595.html#p1721773
https://gmatclub.com/forum/improve-reading-habit-233410.html#p1802265

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 23 Sep 2013
Posts: 141
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Feb 2016, 07:38
ajaygmat016 wrote:
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.
(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has
(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee



Hi mikemcgarry and DmitryFarber

I'm having a hard time in finding concrete reasons to reject the incorrect answer choices in this question. Many posters seem to portray the usage of 'being',' having been' as the main culprit without providing a reasonable explanation.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

Many posters say that this choice is incorrect because of the:
1)" wrong chronological order of events" - IMO 'and ' puts equal weight-age to both entities along each side,hence I believe there shouldn't be an issue pertaining to the time-frame of events . Please correct me if am wrong!
2) "2 initial modifiers connect the author being a US citizen and being born in 1940 to her living in England and Canada" - noun modifiers modify the subject of the following clause, they don't have to modify the action?


(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
I agree here the chronology of events is questionable, but I would like to know whether there is an issue with the usage of modifier "Having been a United States citizen since 1988"?


(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
again what is the issue in this choice. Is there an issue with parallelism or the modifier ?

(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
what are the key issues in this choice?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
SR
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2014
Posts: 31
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2016, 04:39
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
x2suresh wrote:
First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation.

I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff

"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."

For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense."


Can someone throw some light on this aspect of present perfect tense.
If you take whole life as an event then you can say i have lived in x,y and z even if u don't live in it now.
What does this exactly mean? Why she has is correct in this question?


hi experts,
not getting usage of 'has' in this question.
what I know so far about 'has' is, it is used to state an action which starts in the past and continues into the present.
so by this definition 'she has lived in England and Canada' mean that she is still living in England and Canada.
how can one person live two countries at same time.
please help me understand the usage of 'has'.

Thanks & regards,
Sunil01
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Posts: 26
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2016, 01:49
Sunil01 wrote:
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
x2suresh wrote:
First, I chose D . I chose C after reading the below explanation.

I found the following explantion from another forum..When I saw this question first time. I was skeptical about the usage of present perfect in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff

"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."

For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense."


Can someone throw some light on this aspect of present perfect tense.
If you take whole life as an event then you can say i have lived in x,y and z even if u don't live in it now.
What does this exactly mean? Why she has is correct in this question?


hi experts,
not getting usage of 'has' in this question.
what I know so far about 'has' is, it is used to state an action which starts in the past and continues into the present.
so by this definition 'she has lived in England and Canada' mean that she is still living in England and Canada.
how can one person live two countries at same time.
please help me understand the usage of 'has'.

Thanks & regards,
Sunil01

Hi,
You may want to read this quote which is already post above, credit by Manhattan staff.

"That is an interesting question. You are correct that the present perfect is used to discuss an event that began at some point in the past and continues to the present moment. Although I understand your interpretation that this "event" is where the author lived, the intention of the sentence is to use the entire life of the author as the "event."

For example, in my life I have lived in Boston, Atlanta, Colorado, and California. This does not mean, however, that I still live in each of these places. As my life is an ongoing event, the present perfect is an appropriate verb tense."
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 9
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2016, 08:05
egmat wrote:
Hi All,

Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

Image

• Author Bharati Mukherjee was born in Calcutta in 1940.
• She first came to the US in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop.
• She became the US citizen in 1988.
• She has also lived in England and Canada.

Image

Error Analysis:

• The opening verb-ing modifier connects the author being a US citizen and being born in 1940 to her living in England and Canada, illogically implying that because she is a US citizen and because she was born in 1940, she lived in Eng and Canada and she first came to US to study in 1961. Modifier error.
o Being a singer and not being an actress, Jennifer Lopez shot to instant fame.
o Even though the OG sentence is grammatically correct, it’s not logical. So when we read a sentence, we should make sure it communicates logical meaning.

POE:

Choice A: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

Choice B: Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect.
a. “having been…” now suggests that the author got over with being the US citizen since 1988 and then she took birth in 1940. This is absolutely illogical.
b. The first IC has just the pronoun “she”. The antecedent is actually introduced in the second IC.

Choice C: Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has: Correct. The opening modifier correctly modifies the author. The IC after semicolon correctly gives additional information as to which other countries she has stayed in.

Choice D: Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A.

Choice E: Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee: Incorrect. Same modifier error as in A.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha

Thanks for the elaborative explanation.. very helpful indeed.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2015
Posts: 15
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2016, 22:17
1
in option C "has lived in England and Canda" that could mean that she is living in England and Canada. Then I searched around and got this from info from a Manhattan Staff
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Posts: 132
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2016, 13:38
SPLIT1) "BEING BORN" OR "HAVING BEEN" IN THE BEGINNING OF THE SENTENCE IS CONFUSING AND AKWARD. SO OFF THE BAT, A,B,D AND E ARE OUT BUT BEFORE I CONFIRM LET'S SEE OTHER SPLITS.

SPLIT2) OPTION B THE PRONOUN "SHE" DOES NOT HAVE AN ANTECEDENT, IT IS NAKED! THE ANTECEDENT IS ACTUALLY IN THE SECOND INDEPENDENT CLAUSE. B IS OUT.

SPLIT3) THE MODIFIER IN A AND B C AND D IS WRONG. THE WORD "AUTHOR.." IS MODIFYING THE PREVIOUS CLAUSE BUT IT IS NOT LOGICAL BECAUSE IT COMPARES THE AUTHOR LIVING IN CANADA AND ENGLAND TO THE AUTHOR BEING A US CITIZEN AND BEING BORN IN CALCUTA. ILLOGICAL COMPARISONS. A,B,D AND E ARE OUT.

SPLIT4) "BEING BORN" AND "BEING A US CITIZEN" => BEING + PAST PARTICIPLE => PROGRESSIVE PASSIVE VOICE => IT MEANS SOMETHING THAT STARTED IN THE PAST AND CONTINUES TILL THE PRESENT MOMETN => THIS IS ILLOGICAL BECAUSE IT MEANS THAT THE WRITER BEING BORN AT THIS MOMENT OR BEING A US CITIZEN. A AND D ARE OUT.

SPLIT 5) "HAVING BEEN" IS PAST PARTICIPLE MEANING SOMETHING IS FINISHED IN THE PAST WHILE "BEING" IN THE SAME CLAUSE SUGGEST CONTINUATION =>CONFUSING BECAUSE WITH "HAVING BEEN" I WOULD EXPECT THE CLAUSE AFTER THE COMMA TO SAY SOMETHING LIKE "THIS IS DONE/FINISHED". I ALSO ADD THAT IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO SAY "HAVING BEEN" BORN IN CALCUTA, ILLOGICAL, ARE THERE BETTER WAYS TO SAY SHE WAS BORN IN CALCUTA? THIS IS THE SIMILAR ISSUE AS WITH SPLIT4. "BEING" ADDS A LAYER OF CONFUSION BECAUSE "BEING" NEEDS THE SECOND CLAUSE TO CONFIRM THE SITUATION IS STILL TAKING PLACE NOW. AS A CONCLUSION, BECAUSE E HAS BOTH AND ENDING AND A PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION, IT IS WRONG!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 106
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Feb 2017, 10:20
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

Issues: Verb form | Construction

Analysis:
1. A quick glance at the sentence will tell you that the organization of chronological events in the sentence is bit confusing.
2. The correct choice should establish non-confusing chronological order


(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has
- Confusing construction

(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
- Non-sensical phrase; The phrasing of the clause suggests that the author became "United States citizen" before she was born.
- "she" has no clear referent as the author has not been mentioned in first clause.


(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has

(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
- Incorrect verb form; Present continuous;
- Illogical construction; Being born in Calcutta and being a US citizen has no bearing on author's current situation.


(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee
- Incorrect verb form; Present continuous;
- Illogical construction; Having born in Calcutta and being a US citizen has no bearing on author's current situation.


Answer: (C)
Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 252
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Aug 2017, 23:17
1
Answer choice 'C' expressed logically, grammatically, and concisely in each independent clause.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Mannheim Thread Master
User avatar
S
Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 252
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 22:15
'C' is correct -

OE: Being . . . since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940 is an awkward, wordy construction, which presents an unclear and potentially confusing chronological order. Since in the correct version of the sentence the original phrase (being …) has been made into a main clause, a semicolon should separate it from the second main clause beginning she has lived.
_________________

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Threadmaster for B-school Discussions
Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Sep 2017
Posts: 20
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
WE: General Management (Computer Software)
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2017, 15:31
Sachin9 wrote:
Hi Shraddha,
B is wrong because there 's no referent for she as she is mentioned in another sentence.

We have the same issue in C as well.. No mention of referent of C in the 2nd sentence after the semicolon. How is then that C is right?


(Three years later...)

Hello,

I am not sure if the issues between B and C regarding 'she' are the same. When writing essays, I believe we could use the following writing tool to sintetize:

"I would like to study at Harvard Business School (HBS) because (...) When I attend HBS, I will be (...)"

In the second sentence, how does the reader know what is 'HBS'? Because you defined it.

In letter B, 'she' became before the author's name. How do we know that 'she' is 'Bharati Mukherjee'?

On the other hand, in letter C, the sentence presents you Bharati Mukherjee and, then, recall her using 'she'.

Best,
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Aug 2011
Posts: 21
Location: United States (NY)
Undergraduate: Stanford
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V40
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V40
WE: Asset Management (Consulting)
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Dec 2017, 10:57
Long underline. I expect structure, meaning, or parallelism to be an issue.

Regarding structure. sentence has a subject and verb.
Subject: Bharati
Verb: has lived

A: Don't see an issue.
B: Sequence of events is off.
C: Don't see an issue.
D: Sequence of events is off. The meaning states she accomplished something prior to living in England and Canada.
E: Sequence of events is off. The meaning states she accomplished something prior to living in England and Canada.

Return to A and C
A: I see a parrallelism marker -> and. To the right I have born. To the left I have "being." Not the same part of speech.

My selection: Choice C.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1219
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2018, 10:17
ajaygmat016 wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2016

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 67
Page: 260

Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.


(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee

(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has

(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

It's (C) clear and crisp
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 137
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
CAT Tests
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2018, 06:34
Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has
Chronological error

(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee
Chronological error

(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has
Correct. This sentence is clear and concise.

(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

Takeaway from this sentence is that
How GMAT avoids the usage of BEING, HAVING BEING.
Meaning plays a very important role.
Look for the chronology if the timings of events are present in the sentence.

On the basis of above takeaways C is the clear answer.
Re: Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in &nbs [#permalink] 24 Apr 2018, 06:34

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.