It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 22:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 126

Kudos [?]: 98 [4], given: 0

Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2005, 01:59
4
KUDOS
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.

A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?

(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.

Source: Arco or 1000 Series

Kudos [?]: 98 [4], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 41

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 08:04
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?

(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
The word motivated is too extreme... Individuals were seeking to control....not motivated by desire to control..
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
We dont know about that.... There might be few charges based on his personal life.. Also, passage only states that his conduct of officials duties has helped him for success of corporation...
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever.The trial might be in process for few charges... So we can't say whether he is innocent or not.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
Steadily is tempting... But,i'll keep it...
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.
Maybe he is acquitted because of lack of evidence...

IMO its D...

Source: Arco or 1000 Series[/quote]
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 41

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2013
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 48 [1], given: 27

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 10:36
1
KUDOS
wunderbar03 wrote:
Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.

A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?

(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes. There is a possibility that some of the people that demanded the chairman's resignation might have no interest in obtaining control of the corporation. If all was replaced by some then the answer would be correct. In inference questions, I recommend avoiding answer choices that contain "all", "most", etc
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation. chairman never mentions that he did anything wrong
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense. passage never mentions that the chairman is innocent
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years. came from passage, correct answer
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal. we don't know if this has happened yet

Source: Arco or 1000 Series

Please give me kudos if my post has helped you

Kudos [?]: 48 [1], given: 27

Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2013
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2013, 23:17
A and D are clearly stated in the passage , hence cannot be inferred. This leaves us with only option B. If the rule of elimination were to be followed, B is the best choice.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 24

Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2013, 12:38
A seems extreme to me. Only D can be inferred.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 24

Current Student
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Oct 2014, 10:07
Does acquittal mean "not proven guilty" in this case.Should it not be E then?I'm confused

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 178

Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 190

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 49

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 05:37
wunderbar03 wrote:
Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.

A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.

Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?

(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.

Source: Arco or 1000 Series

Use of "all" makes choice A incorrect.Correct answer is D

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 49

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 296

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 916

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q42 V44
GMAT 3: 680 Q44 V39
GMAT 4: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.7
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2015, 00:47
I went with (A), because the causal relationship A->B and B->A, in this case, seems to work both ways.

Additionally, one thing worried me about (D), namely that in the question stem they use FUTURE tense "will" when talking about the six years' unbroken growth of the company. Talking about the future, questions the validity of the statement. What's your take on that?

Thanks!
_________________

Thank you very much for reading this post till the end! Kudos?

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 916

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 1954 [1], given: 6

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2015, 01:43
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Unfortunately, the questions which generate the most discussion are often the questions least worth studying. Some questions generate discussion because they don't really have any good answer.

I gather D is the 'OA' here, but for D to be right, you have to think that "steady" means something different from what it really means ('unbroken' and 'steady' are not even close to being synonyms), and that "growth" and "expansion" mean the same thing (they don't). So D just is not a good answer here.

I think you can read the stem a certain way that makes A seem true, but if this were a real GMAT question (which it's not) then the use of 'all' in A would be problematic.

The bigger problem with both A and D is that neither is any kind of inference. They just restate information in the stem.

E might be right, depending on what you think they mean by 'legal proceedings' and 'acquittal'. The stem tells us "no court of law ... has found me guilty of any criminal offense", but there are legal proceedings that are not criminal, and other outcomes of legal proceedings besides a guilty finding and an acquittal.

B finds no support at all in the passage.

C is the most interesting option, because the stem itself redefines the meaning of the word "innocent": "an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty". That is not what "innocent" actually means, but if we forget the real meaning of the word, and accept that as the definition of "innocent", then C is right, and it has the added benefit of being a genuine inference.
No real GMAT question will ever invent a new definition for a common word and ask you to draw an inference on the basis of that definition, so this is also a very strange answer.

That's a long way of saying: this is a question with no good answer, so is not worth reviewing in any detail.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 1954 [1], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 224

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2015, 07:41
IMO, D !
so the confusion is between A and D for most people.
An inference answer 'must be true'.
Notice the word 'all' in option a. That is too strong a word. maybe some people with the mentioned motive were there..but not all.
hence D.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 224

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 531

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 606

Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2016, 00:50
Top Contributor
I appreciate any inputs on this..

(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
>>The corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show..
What if the growth pattern is following: +10%, +5%,+2%,+10%. Though the organisation is showing growth , there is fluctuation. Will D still hold in this situation?
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.
>> Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever.
Why is E wrong?
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 606

Re: Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the   [#permalink] 09 Sep 2016, 00:50

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   [ 150 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.