Mck2023 wrote:
Hi
GMATNinjaAs you say the wrong can mostly be eliminated without even considering idioms. I love what you say, because I do not think of myself memorizing idioms. Coming to this question, can you please find any other way to eliminate D than idiom. Maybe use of also is must? Or anything? (Sorry for the silly question, it you find it so.) Thank you!!!
Hi
Mck2023, I am no GmatNinja but let me try to help you. Just like you, I am also not a fan of idioms. However, I have only memorised few correlative conjunctions/idioms(whatever you'd like to call). Few examples
1. Either ... or ...
2. Neither ... nor ...
3. Not ... but ...
4. Not only ... but also ...
5. Not only ... but ... as well
6. Both ... and ...
I agree it is not useful to learn differneces in phrases like
ability of vs
ability to, but learning above mentioned idioms/correlative conjunctions/special parallelism triggers(as mentioned by GmatNinja in one of his video) is super helpful. Now lets look at option B and D
Quote:
(D) of Mohandas K.Gandhi as a person and as also a politician, but Tagore was
The problem with D is not with idioms but with parellism (If you noticed here, I used Not A But B construction, in which A and B are parallel). We have "as a person" and "also as a politicion", here the word "also" is the problem, and is breaking the parallelism b/w A and B. One more thing, using "and" and "also" together is redundant, so its best to avoid using both together. So D can be eliminated
Quote:
(B) for Mohandas K.Gandhi as a person and as a politician, but Tagore was also
Compared with D we have nice parallel construction here "as a person" and "as a politician", and the word "also" is now removed. So B is the best we can do with this question.
If you are still not convinced with my explanation, please check out the below video in which GmatNinja has covered this question in details (Start the video around 44th min to jump to this specific question). Hope this helps