Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 28 Mar 2017, 03:37

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 885
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 7

Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 15:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency distribution of letters and letter sequences, was the standard typewriter keyboard designed?

Cora: To ask this question, you must be making a mistaken assumption: that typing speed was to be maximized. The real danger with early typewriters was that operators would hit successive keys too quickly, thereby crashing typebars into each other, bending connecting wires and so on. So the idea was to slow the operator down by making the most common letter sequences awkward to type.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard’s rejection of her explanation?

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.
(B) Typewriters have been superseded in most offices by word-processing equipment, which has inherited the standard keyboard from typewriters.
(C) The standard keyboard allows skilled operators to achiever considerable typing speeds, thought it makes acquiring such skills relatively difficult.
(D) A person who has learned one keyboard layout can readily learn to use a second one in place of the first, but only with difficulty learn to use a second one alongside the first.
(E) It is now possible to construct typewriter and word-processing equipment in which a single keyboard can accommodate two or even more different keyboard layouts, each accessible to the operator at will.

I could not understand the highlighted part.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 17:46
whoops double post

Last edited by beckee529 on 17 Aug 2007, 17:48, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 17:47
Fistail wrote:
Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency distribution of letters and letter sequences, was the standard typewriter keyboard designed?

Cora: To ask this question, you must be making a mistaken assumption: that typing speed was to be maximized. The real danger with early typewriters was that operators would hit successive keys too quickly, thereby crashing typebars into each other, bending connecting wires and so on. So the idea was to slow the operator down by making the most common letter sequences awkward to type.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard’s rejection of her explanation?

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.
(B) Typewriters have been superseded in most offices by word-processing equipment, which has inherited the standard keyboard from typewriters.
(C) The standard keyboard allows skilled operators to achiever considerable typing speeds, thought it makes acquiring such skills relatively difficult.
(D) A person who has learned one keyboard layout can readily learn to use a second one in place of the first, but only with difficulty learn to use a second one alongside the first.
(E) It is now possible to construct typewriter and word-processing equipment in which a single keyboard can accommodate two or even more different keyboard layouts, each accessible to the operator at will.

I could not understand the highlighted part.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

the "technological limitations" eliminated referred here is how operators overcame the obstacle of the absence of common letter sequences. So in other words, Bernand is saying why are the keyboard keys still designed the way they are even though operators can now type just as fast (with the ackward sequence not being a problem anymore).

the answer should be C
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 582
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 20:28
Fistail wrote:
Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency distribution of letters and letter sequences, was the standard typewriter keyboard designed?

Cora: To ask this question, you must be making a mistaken assumption: that typing speed was to be maximized. The real danger with early typewriters was that operators would hit successive keys too quickly, thereby crashing typebars into each other, bending connecting wires and so on. So the idea was to slow the operator down by making the most common letter sequences awkward to type.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard’s rejection of her explanation?

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.
(B) Typewriters have been superseded in most offices by word-processing equipment, which has inherited the standard keyboard from typewriters.
(C) The standard keyboard allows skilled operators to achiever considerable typing speeds, thought it makes acquiring such skills relatively difficult.
(D) A person who has learned one keyboard layout can readily learn to use a second one in place of the first, but only with difficulty learn to use a second one alongside the first.
(E) It is now possible to construct typewriter and word-processing equipment in which a single keyboard can accommodate two or even more different keyboard layouts, each accessible to the operator at will.

I could not understand the highlighted part.

Well my answer would be D .
To answer your red part : Well Bernard is saying ..Cora you said because of over use of some keys wires could get weared quicky thats why they placed the awkwardly ...but now technology so great that those wires may never get weared down..so why the hell keys placement didnt change.So how should Cora reply to this is what this question is asking .
He has to prove that a person who is use to one type of style will face difficulty is learning the second one ..I think D makes that clear.
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 184
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

17 Aug 2007, 22:55
I think its B.

His counter argument is that. the word processing systems of today inherited the keyboard from the type writer which has the earlier problems.
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 871
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

18 Aug 2007, 04:17
I think only C makes sense...rest are out of scope.
Manager
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 202
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 05:45
C for me.
Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 885
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 07:21
Fistail wrote:
Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency distribution of letters and letter sequences, was the standard typewriter keyboard designed?

Cora: To ask this question, you must be making a mistaken assumption: that typing speed was to be maximized. The real danger with early typewriters was that operators would hit successive keys too quickly, thereby crashing typebars into each other, bending connecting wires and so on. So the idea was to slow the operator down by making the most common letter sequences awkward to type.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard’s rejection of her explanation?

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.
(B) Typewriters have been superseded in most offices by word-processing equipment, which has inherited the standard keyboard from typewriters.
(C) The standard keyboard allows skilled operators to achiever considerable typing speeds, thought it makes acquiring such skills relatively difficult.
(D) A person who has learned one keyboard layout can readily learn to use a second one in place of the first, but only with difficulty learn to use a second one alongside the first.
(E) It is now possible to construct typewriter and word-processing equipment in which a single keyboard can accommodate two or even more different keyboard layouts, each accessible to the operator at will.

I could not understand the highlighted part.

thanx guys. but OA is A.
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 871
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

19 Aug 2007, 10:03
What was I thinking in choosing C...If the typewriters were designed for use of a specific segment of the population then A totally makes sense and counters Bernad's argument...any thoughts??
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jul 2009, 01:00
Fistail wrote:
Fistail wrote:
Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency distribution of letters and letter sequences, was the standard typewriter keyboard designed?

Cora: To ask this question, you must be making a mistaken assumption: that typing speed was to be maximized. The real danger with early typewriters was that operators would hit successive keys too quickly, thereby crashing typebars into each other, bending connecting wires and so on. So the idea was to slow the operator down by making the most common letter sequences awkward to type.

Bernand: This is surely not right! These technological limitations have long since vanished, yet the keyboard is still as it was then.

Which one of the following, if true, could be used by Cora to counter Bernard’s rejection of her explanation?

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.
(B) Typewriters have been superseded in most offices by word-processing equipment, which has inherited the standard keyboard from typewriters.
(C) The standard keyboard allows skilled operators to achiever considerable typing speeds, thought it makes acquiring such skills relatively difficult.
(D) A person who has learned one keyboard layout can readily learn to use a second one in place of the first, but only with difficulty learn to use a second one alongside the first.
(E) It is now possible to construct typewriter and word-processing equipment in which a single keyboard can accommodate two or even more different keyboard layouts, each accessible to the operator at will.

I could not understand the highlighted part.

thanx guys. but OA is A.

Why is A better than B?
_________________

Work hardest to get what you like
Otherwise you will be forced to like what you get
I am out for killing again. Getting started again.
I give what you want, You give me what I want.

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 849
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 106

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2009, 02:58
I picked D to contradict the fact that the layout remained the same, but now I understand I am wrong.

I agree with A.

(A) Typewriters and word-processing equipment are typically sold to people who have learned to use the standard keyboard and who, therefore, demand it in equipment they buy.

We need to contradict the statement stating that layout be same as it is designed for better efficiency of the language. Contradiction by A: It is not because of the efficiency but the customer who are accustomed to the layout.

opinions?
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 160
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2009, 03:51
I agree that A is better than D but why cant we pick up (B).
Why should A be preferred over B
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 849
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 315 [0], given: 106

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2009, 10:52
shrutisingh wrote:
I agree that A is better than D but why cant we pick up (B).
Why should A be preferred over B

B is not contradicting bernand statment. It, I think, is mostly supporting(not too strongly but still)

As it says that typewriters has been replaced, it is supporting the statement "These technological limitations have long since vanished" by Bernard.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 3

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jul 2009, 08:41
1
KUDOS
1) Bernand asks a question about typewriter design.
2) Cora answers by saying that a particular design was adopted because of technical limitations.
3) Bernand rejects the explanation saying that the technical limitations have seized to exist long before.

4) Now in order to counter this, Cora needs to either :
a) provide evidence that technical limitations still exist;
OR
b) provide a reason why the design has not been changed if she accepts the fact that limitations
have seized to exist.

Option A perfectly fits in the reasoning 4(b).
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Re: CR: Keyboard [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Jul 2009, 01:49
Yeah, should be A.
Re: CR: Keyboard   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2009, 01:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
19 Citing the frequency with which gum disease and heart 31 16 Jul 2012, 11:24
12 Citing the frequency with which gum disease and heart 17 29 Jan 2012, 14:33
Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency 21 27 Sep 2009, 11:17
2 Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency 11 26 Oct 2008, 01:59
3 Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency 15 02 Jul 2008, 04:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Bernand: For which language, and thus which frequency

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.