It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 08:01

STARTING SOON:

Live Chat with Cornell Adcoms in Main Chat Room  |  R1 Interview Invites: MIT Sloan Chat  |  UCLA Anderson Chat  |  Duke Fuqua Chat (EA Decisions)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged

Author Message
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 01:43
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 87 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant, at an average of 95 admissions per 1,000 beds per year. Between 1985 and 1988, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 92 percent of capacity, while admission rates declined to 81 per 1,000 beds per year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

(A) The average length of time nursing-home residents stayed in nursing homes increased between 1985 and 1988.

(B) The proportion of older people living in nursing homes was greater in 1988 than in 1975.

(C) Nursing home admission rates tend to decline whenever occupancy rates rise.

(D) Nursing homes built prior to 1985 generally had fewer beds than did nursing homes built between 1985 and 1988.

(E) The more beds a nursing home has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 231

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 02:05
go A go...

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 02:33
I think A is the only close on, rest all are out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1884

Kudos [?]: 378 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 05:23
Between 1975 and 1985, nursing-home occupancy rates averaged 87 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant, at an average of 95 admissions per 1,000 beds per year. Between 1985 and 1988, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 92 percent of capacity, while admission rates declined to 81 per 1,000 beds per year.

If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions can be most properly drawn?

(A) The average length of time nursing-home residents stayed in nursing homes increased between 1985 and 1988.---> clearly the conclusion coz the passage shows that there're more older staying in nursing-home but smaller admission rates possibly because those olders stay a longer time in nursing-home.

(B) The proportion of older people living in nursing homes was greater in 1988 than in 1975----> can't be the conclusion coz it doesn't involve the admission rates which are purposedly stated in the passage.

(C) Nursing home admission rates tend to decline whenever occupancy rates rise. ---> "whenever" is somewhat extreme...also, we can't make such a conclusion by comparing only two periods.

(D) Nursing homes built prior to 1985 generally had fewer beds than did nursing homes built between 1985 and 1988. ---> the passage doesn't mention anything related to this.

(E) The more beds a nursing home has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.--> the passage doesn't mention about this.

A it is.

Kudos [?]: 378 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1700

Kudos [?]: 473 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 07:32
it is a clear A for me.

admission rate declined but occupancy increased. Only way it would have been possible, if patients had stayed longer.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 473 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 21:52
one more A !

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

15 Nov 2005, 21:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by