It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 05:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 932 [2], given: 184

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2013, 20:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (03:37) correct 47% (01:50) wrong based on 587 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitories averaged 91 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant at an average of 200 students per 1,000 rooms per year. Between 1989 and 1994, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 98 percent of capacity, while student admission rates declined to 150 per 1,000 rooms per year.

If the information above is true, it would most clearly support which of the following statements?
(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994.
(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.
(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise.
(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989.
(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
Looking to finance your tuition: Click here

Kudos [?]: 932 [2], given: 184

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 3

Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2013, 22:14
I have chosen B. I would appreciate if you can provide explanation.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 3

6 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 405

Kudos [?]: 932 [6], given: 184

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jan 2013, 23:36
6
This post received
KUDOS
The stimulus offers facts about the occupancy rates in college dormitories for two time periods – 1984-1989 and 1989-1994. The more recent time period had an increase in occupancy rates at the same time fewer students were admitted. Here, a strong connection between the two statements allows us to predict that the increase in occupancy rates during 1989-1994 must be caused by more current students remaining in the dormitories. The increase in occupancy rates cannot be caused by more new students because there were fewer students admitted.

Choice (A) states that the average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994. This matches with above explanation and is the correct answer.

Choice (B) says that the proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989. This is an irrelevant comparison; we are concerned with the percentage of rooms that are occupied, not the percentage of students who live in dormitories.

Choice (C) mentions that student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise. This is outside of the scope; we can’t infer anything about how admission and occupancy rates typically behave from this specific example.

Choice (D) indicates that campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989. This makes an irrelevant comparison – the number of rooms is not an issue, as the stimulus gives us the information as a “"per 1,000”" rate.

Choice (E) suggests that the more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be. This doesn't follow from the stimulus – again, the rate of occupancy makes the actual number of rooms irrelevant.
_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
Looking to finance your tuition: Click here

Kudos [?]: 932 [6], given: 184

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 7

Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2013, 21:11
Although I chose correct answer ,but have a tough time in interpreting choice -A ,especially occupancy rate & admission rate

Please someone explain a bit more on OA


Thanks
Bijay

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 7

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Oct 2012
Posts: 69

Kudos [?]: -9 [1], given: 0

Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: IE '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V46
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2013, 21:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
addmission rate - number of students admitted to the dormitory/1000 rooms
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.
Answer - A

Kudos [?]: -9 [1], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2013, 21:55
rohantiwari wrote:
addmission rate - number of students admitted to the dormitory/1000 rooms
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.
Answer - A


I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Image Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 34

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2013, 10:16
Belerofonte wrote:
rohantiwari wrote:
addmission rate - number of students admitted to the dormitory/1000 rooms
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.
Answer - A


I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Image Posted from GMAT ToolKit


A ,Correct, the number of new students decrease, so the average stay of the other students must increase to have a higher occupancy rate.
B, Incorrect as we are given the average 98 percent, we cannot be sure that the number of students were more in 1994 or 1989. We cannot conclude this from the information provided.
Rest all are way off.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 34

Expert Post
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 608

Kudos [?]: 517 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitorie [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2013, 01:21
Belerofonte wrote:
rohantiwari wrote:
addmission rate - number of students admitted to the dormitory/1000 rooms
occupancy rate is the percentage of rooms that remain occupied in a particular time period.
even though number of students admitted decreased, their stay at the dormitory increased hence the occupancy rate increased.
Answer - A


I do not agree: the number of admitted students does not necessarely decrease, only the rate does. Very confusing question...

Image Posted from GMAT ToolKit


Hi,

Assume:

In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, Old students = 710
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960 Old students = 1660

The greater proportion of old students to new students in 1994 would result in increased average stay period of the students in 1994.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com/regularcourse.php

Pay After Use
Standardized Approaches

Kudos [?]: 517 [0], given: 16

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2013, 11:38
I missed the meaning of occupancy rate - hence messed up my answer choice

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 153

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 84

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Nov 2013, 20:10
PraPon wrote:
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college dormitories averaged 91 percent of capacity, while admission rates remained constant at an average of 200 students per 1,000 rooms per year. Between 1989 and 1994, however, occupancy rates rose to an average of 98 percent of capacity, while student admission rates declined to 150 per 1,000 rooms per year.

If the information above is true, it would most clearly support which of the following statements?
(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994.
(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.
(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise.
(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989.
(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be.



Good one ;
Passage- said That OR-91 when AR-Constant; OR-98 when AR- Decresed.

(A) The average length of time that students remained in campus housing increased between 1989 and 1994. - Correctly defies the ; if the average time the student spending in campus increases then the rooms are likely to occupied at single point of tie hence the occupancy rate will go up, irrespective of the Admission rate.

(B) The proportion of students living in campus housing was greater in 1994 than in 1989.- Now here the word proportion of students is used which mean the ratio of no. of students; i guess OR - defined by no. of rooms occupied /total no. of rooms, not by total no. of students. So this is also not true.

(C) Student admission rates tend to decline whenever campus-housing occupancy rates rise. - So this fact already mentioned in the passage, need not to repeat, this is a fact.

(D) Campus dormitories built prior to 1989 generally had fewer rooms than did campus dormitories built after 1989- May be the case but increased rooms does not correlate with increased occupancy and decreased AR.

(E) The more rooms campus housing has, the higher its occupancy rate is likely to be. - passage discusses the relation v\between OR and AR not with no. of rooms.



:banana
_________________

Thanks for Posting

LEARN TO ANALYSE

+1 kudos if you like

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 84

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10121

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2015, 21:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 601

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 41

Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2015, 23:29
Prephrasing: If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students study more time

A

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 41

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1272

Kudos [?]: 2315 [0], given: 178

Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2015, 06:31
Temurkhon wrote:
Prephrasing: If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students study more time

A


If we use the same logic for variant B:
If admission rate goes down but occupancy goes up the reason can be that admmitted students start living in the campus and not outside campus.

---- Another explanation:
In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, Old students = 710
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960 Old students = 1660

The greater proportion of old students to new students in 1994 would result in increased average stay period of the students in 1994.

The same logic for B

In 1989: No.of rooms =1000, New students = 200, Rooms occupied= 910, students live not in campus: 90
In 1994: No.of rooms = 2000, New students = 300, Rooms occupied= 1960, students live not in campus: 40
The greater proportion of students living in campus to students living not in campus in 1994 would result in increased number of students live in campus

====


If we can infer that student start living in campus more time why we can't infer that they stop living outside the campus and as a result occupancy rate increase?

Am I miss something obvious?
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

Kudos [?]: 2315 [0], given: 178

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2016
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2017, 09:04
Harley1980 wrote:

If we can infer that student start living in campus more time why we can't infer that they stop living outside the campus and as a result occupancy rate increase?

Am I miss something obvious?


I dropped B because the stimulus compares 84-89 with 89-94 (periods) while the answer option compares 89 with 94 (specific years).

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 269

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2017, 09:02
Hi experts,
Can you please elaborate more on option A and B?

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 906

Expert Post
Top Contributor
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1049

Kudos [?]: 1598 [0], given: 400

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Apr 2017, 10:15
Expert's post
Top Contributor
This is basically a "resolve the paradox" question. We're trying to figure out how it's possible that the following are both true:

    occupancy rates are up
    BUT student admission rates are down, at least relative to the number of available rooms

As others have explained here, (A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are up, even if admissions rates are down.

But what's the problem with (B)? Well, it leaves a subtle loophole: "proportion of students" isn't necessarily the same thing as "proportion of admitted students." For example, you could have a greater proportion of students living in campus housing, but if tons had dropped out -- or had decided not to attend after being admitted -- then it still wouldn't resolve the paradox. (B) simply doesn't cleanly connect admitted students to actual occupancy in student housing.

Of course, usual disclaimers apply here about non-official questions, so don't lose much sleep over this one, either.

(Note: this has been edited from the original version since I made a dumb typo.)
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com | GMAT blog |food blog | Friendly warning: I'm really bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses

Kudos [?]: 1598 [0], given: 400

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 57

GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.5
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2017, 23:18
1
This post received
KUDOS
GMATNinja wrote:
This is basically a "resolve the paradox" question. We're trying to figure out how it's possible that the following are both true:

    occupancy rates are up
    BUT student admission rates are down, at least relative to the number of available rooms

As others have explained here, (A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are down, even if admissions rates are not.

But what's the problem with (B)? Well, it leaves a subtle loophole: "proportion of students" isn't necessarily the same thing as "proportion of admitted students." For example, you could have a greater proportion of students living in campus housing, but if tons had dropped out -- or had decided not to attend after being admitted -- then it still wouldn't resolve the paradox. (B) simply doesn't cleanly connect admitted students to actual occupancy in student housing.

Of course, usual disclaimers apply here about non-official questions, so don't lose much sleep over this one, either.


Hi,
In line
(A) makes sense: if students spend more time, on average, living in campus housing, then that would explain why occupancy rates are down, even if admissions rates are not.

Did you mean occupancy rates are going up?
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 57

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Sep 2016
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

CAT Tests
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Apr 2017, 00:44
vishu1414 wrote:
Although I chose correct answer ,but have a tough time in interpreting choice -A ,especially occupancy rate & admission rate

Please someone explain a bit more on OA


Thanks
Bijay


I think A is wrong. What if the number of rooms increased

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Expert Post
Top Contributor
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1049

Kudos [?]: 1598 [0], given: 400

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Apr 2017, 14:59
Expert's post
Top Contributor
Thank you for catching my error, Anje29! Yes, I meant to say that occupancy rates are down. Edited my post so that it doesn't confuse anybody else. :)
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com | GMAT blog |food blog | Friendly warning: I'm really bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses

Kudos [?]: 1598 [0], given: 400

Re: Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college   [#permalink] 10 Apr 2017, 14:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Between 1984 and 1989, occupancy rates in college

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.