Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 13:31

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:50) correct
36% (01:26) wrong based on 149 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45-to-64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18-to-24 age group?

A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Jan 2013, 00:48

1

This post received KUDOS

deoljasms wrote:

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45-to-64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18-to-24 age group?

A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1

This question is from GMAT Focus.

My answer is C.

Given: 1990 - 2000 (one year) Age 45 to 64 = 47 to 61 Age 18 to 24 = 26 to 25

Find: % increase in 45 to 65 / % decrease in 18 to 24

General formula: % increase or % decrease = (new number - old number ) / old number

That being said, we have:

% increase in 45 to 65 = (65 - 45) / 45 = 14 / 47

% decrease in 18 to 25 = (25 - 26) / 26 = - 1 / 26 or 1 / 26 (we can remove the negative sign because we are talking about changes here)

Now we use the two values:

= (14 / 47) / (1 / 26)

= (14 / 47) * ( 26)

= 364 / 47

~ 7.7...

7.7 is closest to 8, which is answer choice (C)

There you have it. Kudos please?
_________________

Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat. - T. Roosevelt

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 17:15

1

This post received KUDOS

While the answer was still right in the above post the numbers are reversed...but here's my approach, quick and simple:

Americans 45-64: Increase 47M to 61M Americans 18-24: Decrease 26M to 25M

Percent change = \(\frac{New-Old}{Old}\)

So we have \(\frac{61-47}{47}\) and \(\frac{25-26}{25}\)

Our ratio becomes \(\frac{14}{47}\):\(\frac{1}{25}\) which leads us to a factor of 14 in the numerator and almost a factor of 2 in the denominator: Since the answer choices were 5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 we know that it must be either 6 or 8 (around 7) and since the denominator isn't quite a factor of 2 different then we would be closer to 8>>Answer C

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2013, 17:35

Hey,

I took a similar approach to the others, but since I assume most people aren't good at doing arithmetic, and even those who are usually aren't lighting fast, I think the following approximation is very useful:

When comparing 14/47 to 1/26, this can seem a little difficult. We can easily compare this though if we bring each of the bases to be around 100:

If we multiply 14/47 by 2/2, we can approximately 30/100. If we multiply 1/26 by 4/4, we get something a tad smaller than 4/100.

While the answer was still right in the above post the numbers are reversed...but here's my approach, quick and simple:

Americans 45-64: Increase 47M to 61M Americans 18-24: Decrease 26M to 25M

Percent change = \(\frac{New-Old}{Old}\)

So we have \(\frac{61-47}{47}\) and \(\frac{25-26}{25}\)

Our ratio becomes \(\frac{14}{47}\):\(\frac{1}{25}\) which leads us to a factor of 14 in the numerator and almost a factor of 2 in the denominator: Since the answer choices were 5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 we know that it must be either 6 or 8 (around 7) and since the denominator isn't quite a factor of 2 different then we would be closer to 8>>Answer C

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Oct 2013, 02:23

deoljasms wrote:

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45-to-64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18-to-24 age group?

A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1

This question is from GMAT Focus.

Thirty Seconds approach:

increase in aged 45 to 64: 14 million in 47 or approximately 30% decrease in aged 18 to 24: 1 million in 26 or approximately 4%

Therefore their ratio is 30%/4% = 7.5 to 1, which is nearest to C

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Dec 2015, 13:26

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________