Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 28 Jan 2013
Posts: 1

Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2013, 13:31
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
64% (02:47) correct
36% (01:24) wrong based on 140 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45to64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18to24 age group? A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1 This question is from GMAT Focus.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Manager
Status: Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 131
Location: Philippines
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.22
WE: Corporate Finance (Consulting)

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jan 2013, 00:48
1
This post received KUDOS
deoljasms wrote: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45to64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18to24 age group?
A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1
This question is from GMAT Focus. My answer is C. Given: 1990  2000 (one year) Age 45 to 64 = 47 to 61 Age 18 to 24 = 26 to 25 Find: % increase in 45 to 65 / % decrease in 18 to 24 General formula: % increase or % decrease = (new number  old number ) / old number That being said, we have: % increase in 45 to 65 = (65  45) / 45 = 14 / 47 % decrease in 18 to 25 = (25  26) / 26 =  1 / 26 or 1 / 26 (we can remove the negative sign because we are talking about changes here) Now we use the two values: = (14 / 47) / (1 / 26) = (14 / 47) * ( 26) = 364 / 47 ~ 7.7... 7.7 is closest to 8, which is answer choice (C) There you have it. Kudos please?
_________________
Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat.  T. Roosevelt



Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 16
GMAT Date: 08032013
GPA: 3.3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Military & Defense)

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2013, 17:15
1
This post received KUDOS
While the answer was still right in the above post the numbers are reversed...but here's my approach, quick and simple:
Americans 4564: Increase 47M to 61M Americans 1824: Decrease 26M to 25M
Percent change = \(\frac{NewOld}{Old}\)
So we have \(\frac{6147}{47}\) and \(\frac{2526}{25}\)
Our ratio becomes \(\frac{14}{47}\):\(\frac{1}{25}\) which leads us to a factor of 14 in the numerator and almost a factor of 2 in the denominator: Since the answer choices were 5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 we know that it must be either 6 or 8 (around 7) and since the denominator isn't quite a factor of 2 different then we would be closer to 8>>Answer C



Manager
Status: Training
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 90
Location: Canada
GPA: 3.7

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2013, 17:35
Hey, I took a similar approach to the others, but since I assume most people aren't good at doing arithmetic, and even those who are usually aren't lighting fast, I think the following approximation is very useful: When comparing 14/47 to 1/26, this can seem a little difficult. We can easily compare this though if we bring each of the bases to be around 100: If we multiply 14/47 by 2/2, we can approximately 30/100. If we multiply 1/26 by 4/4, we get something a tad smaller than 4/100. The closest, by far, to <4 : 30, is 8. Hope that helps.
_________________
KUDOS please if my post was useful!



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7440
Location: Pune, India

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jun 2013, 23:40
Nwsmith11 wrote: While the answer was still right in the above post the numbers are reversed...but here's my approach, quick and simple:
Americans 4564: Increase 47M to 61M Americans 1824: Decrease 26M to 25M
Percent change = \(\frac{NewOld}{Old}\)
So we have \(\frac{6147}{47}\) and \(\frac{2526}{25}\)
Our ratio becomes \(\frac{14}{47}\):\(\frac{1}{25}\) which leads us to a factor of 14 in the numerator and almost a factor of 2 in the denominator: Since the answer choices were 5, 6, 8, 10, and 14 we know that it must be either 6 or 8 (around 7) and since the denominator isn't quite a factor of 2 different then we would be closer to 8>>Answer C Actually the post above had it right. Change 4564 = \(\frac{14}{47}\) Change 1824 = \(\frac{(25  26)}{26}\) And yes, I would use the same approximation too. \(14*\frac{26}{47}\) 26/47 is approx 1/2 but actually 2 is 1.8 or 1.9 something When you divide 14 by 2, you get 7 but when you divide it by less than 2, you get more than 7. Hence 8 would be the answer.
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2013
Posts: 52

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Oct 2013, 02:23
deoljasms wrote: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 was projected to increase from 47 million to 61 million, while the number of Americans aged 18 to 24 was projected to decrease from 26 million to 25 million. According to this projection, which of the following is closest to the ratio of the percent increase in the 45to64 age group to the percent decrease in the 18to24 age group?
A) 5 to 1 B) 6 to 1 C) 8 to 1 D) 10 to 1 E) 14 to 1
This question is from GMAT Focus. Thirty Seconds approach: increase in aged 45 to 64: 14 million in 47 or approximately 30% decrease in aged 18 to 24: 1 million in 26 or approximately 4% Therefore their ratio is 30%/4% = 7.5 to 1, which is nearest to C



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15951

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2015, 13:26
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2524
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2016, 06:47
is there a faster way to solve this? i got 14/47 % of increase 1/26 % of decrease
14/47 * 26/1 ~364/47 ~7:1...but since we have decrease , then ~8:1...



Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2893
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)

Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64 [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2016, 11:44
mvictor wrote: is there a faster way to solve this? i got 14/47 % of increase 1/26 % of decrease
14/47 * 26/1 ~364/47 ~7:1...but since we have decrease , then ~8:1... I will bat for suk1234 's Percentage approach... That's the quickest way in my opinion...
_________________
Thanks and Regards
Abhishek....
PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS
How to use Search Function in GMAT Club  Rules for Posting in QA forum  Writing Mathematical Formulas Rules for Posting in VA forum  Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )




Re: Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Americans aged 45 to 64
[#permalink]
26 Sep 2016, 11:44







