GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 15:24

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 3335
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2018, 10:24
3
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (02:07) correct 56% (02:02) wrong based on 267 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained duCring the period 2004-2011

Source: Experts Global

_________________
You've got what it takes, but it will take everything you've got
Retired Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 569
Re: Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2018, 11:10
pushpitkc wrote:
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained duCring the period 2004-2011

Source: Experts Global


I go for C.

Upon negation: did go down drastically seems break the conclusion.This statement contradicts 1.2 per month after Sheriff's intervention. Drastically reduced means almost less i.e less than 1.2. Then this is the assumption.

Let me know if this is correct.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 95
Re: Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2018, 11:31
msk0657 wrote:
pushpitkc wrote:
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained duCring the period 2004-2011

Source: Experts Global


I go for C.

Upon negation: did go down drastically seems break the conclusion.This statement contradicts 1.2 per month after Sheriff's intervention. Drastically reduced means almost less i.e less than 1.2. Then this is the assumption.

Let me know if this is correct.

I will go with E ....

It shows that staff is same for the previous sheriff as well as for the new sheriff it means its only the appraoch of new sheriif and because of that only ...the crime rate came down...

Sent from my BND-AL10 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1195
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2018, 07:22
4
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
Correct. This means that the number of robberies actually reduced. We can conclude this by using the information given in the passage. We know that in 2007 the reported robberies were 3. Let us assume that the actual robberies were 10. So the % of reported robberies w.r.t. actual robberies is 30%. Now we know that in 2010 the reported robberies were 1.2. So if the percentage remains same i.e. 30%, then it means that the actual robberies also reduced. This supports the conclusion, hence the assumption.

B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
It might be the lowest figures but this option doesn't state either that the actual robberies reduced or that the sheriff was responsible for the reduction.


C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
We are not worried about the overall crime rate. Argument is about the robberies.

D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
This would weaken the argument.

E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained duCring the period 2004-2011
Out of context
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 468
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Feb 2018, 02:37
gmatexam439 wrote:
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
Correct. This means that the number of robberies actually reduced. We can conclude this by using the information given in the passage. We know that in 2007 the reported robberies were 3. Let us assume that the actual robberies were 10. So the % of reported robberies w.r.t. actual robberies is 30%. Now we know that in 2010 the reported robberies were 1.2. So if the percentage remains same i.e. 30%, then it means that the actual robberies also reduced. This supports the conclusion, hence the assumption.

B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
It might be the lowest figures but this option doesn't state either that the actual robberies reduced or that the sheriff was responsible for the reduction.


C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
We are not worried about the overall crime rate. Argument is about the robberies.

D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
This would weaken the argument.

E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained duCring the period 2004-2011
Out of context


Hi ,
gmatexam439, how does it bride the gap the conclusion that the reduction is because of shrieff's new approach ? Is it because option A did actually reduce and author assumes this for conclusion?

I was looking for some options that will say that was no alternative cause. Option C comes close, but negation of C - Overall crime did go down, will not destroy conclusion, as still overall crime rate hence robbery rate could have gone down because of Shrieff's new approach.

thanks
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Affiliations: IIT Dhanbad
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Posts: 728
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Feb 2018, 03:00
Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County reached an average of 3 reported robberies
per month! Immediate measures had to be taken and Sheriff Sandberg was brought on board in December 2007.
Since then, in the following three years, the average has lowered to just 1.2 reported robberies per month!
Clearly, the number of robbery cases in the town has significantly reduced because of the new Sheriff's approach.

The argument assumes which one of the following?

A. The figure representing robberies reported as a percentage of total robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011.
The percentage of reported robberies remained fairly constant from 2004 through 2011 which means that if the reported robberies has come down then actual robberies has also come down. So, sheriff's approach has actually reduced the no. of robberies (reported and total). This assumption makes the conclusion crystal clear.

B. 1.2 robberies per month is the lowest figure reported since the year 2000.
This might be lowest figure but this doesn't point out that the total robberies has come down. There might be increased unreported cases of robberies.

C. The overall crime rate in the entire state did not go down drastically during 2008-11.
Overall crime rte has not went down.. It should have because of reduced no. of robberies. In any case it doesn't clearly indicate about the robberies. So, this statement either weakens or out of context.

D. In June 2008, the definition of 'robbery' underwent a change in the police terminology because of which many cases which would have been entire termed as robberies were not termed so now.
This clearly weakens the conclusion.. as if the reduced numbers is due to change in the terminology then there is no idea about sheriff's effort.

E. The support staff to the Sheriff remained during the period 2004-2011.
Out of context. We don't know how support staff comes into the role.
_________________
CAT 2017 (98.95) & 2018 (98.91) : 99th percentiler
UPSC Aspirants : Get my app UPSC Important News Reader from Play store.

MBA Social Network : WebMaggu


Appreciate by Clicking +1 Kudos ( Lets be more generous friends.)



What I believe is : "Nothing is Impossible, Even Impossible says I'm Possible" : "Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish".
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5928
Re: Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2019, 23:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2019, 23:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Between 2004 and 2007, the number of robbery cases in Chef County

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne