It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 23:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# BF question

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2007, 04:32
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.
Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual
payouts.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.
D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.
E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2007, 05:29
Jamesk486 wrote:
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.
Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual
payouts.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.
D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.
E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

For (D)

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2007, 06:11
A.

The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal;
Pro-Tect can reduce the number of car-theft policies but its not possible.

the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
and this is the policy adopted.
Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.
and then effectiveness is also studied

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 May 2007, 07:01
apache wrote:
A.

The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal;
Pro-Tect can reduce the number of car-theft policies but its not possible.

the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
and this is the policy adopted.
Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.
and then effectiveness is also studied

exactly (A)! Cheers!

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

18 May 2007, 07:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by