GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jan 2019, 16:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### GMAT Club Tests are Free & Open for Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday!

January 21, 2019

January 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open January 21st for celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday.
• ### The winners of the GMAT game show

January 22, 2019

January 22, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.

# Biologist: Lions and tigers are

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 30 Apr 2016
Posts: 72
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Biologist: Lions and tigers are  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2017, 04:44
1
2
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:55) correct 44% (02:20) wrong based on 197 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Biologist: Lions and tigers are so similar to each other anatomically that their skeletons are virtually indistinguishable.But their behaviors are known to be quite different: tigers hunt only as solitary individuals,whereas lions hunt in packs.Thus,paleontologists cannot reasonably infer solely on the basis of skeletal anatomy that extinct predatory animals,such as certain dinosaurs,hunted in packs. The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The skeletons of lions and tigers are at least somewhat similar in structure in certain key respects to the skeletons of at least some extinct predatory animals.
(B) There have existed at least two species of extinct predatory dinosaurs that were so similar to each other that their skeletal anatomy is virtually indistinguishable.
(C) If skeletal anatomy alone is ever an inadequate basis for inferring a particular species’ hunting behavior,then it is never reasonable to infer,based on skeletal anatomy alone,that a species of animals hunted in packs.
(D) If any two animal species with virtually indistinguishable skeletal anatomy exhibit quite different hunting behaviors,then it is never reasonable to infer,based solely on the hunting behavior of those species,that the two species have the same skeletal anatomy.
(E) If it is unreasonable to infer,solely on the basis of differences in skeletal anatomy,that extinct animals of two distinct species differed in their hunting behavior,then the skeletal remains of those two species are virtually indistinguishable.
Current Student
Joined: 18 Feb 2017
Posts: 14
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V39
GPA: 3
Re: Biologist: Lions and tigers are  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Apr 2017, 01:06
1
Wow! This one horrid question.
Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2017
Posts: 30
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Other
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Biologist: Lions and tigers are  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2017, 09:08
1
1
aurobindomahanty wrote:
Biologist: Lions and tigers are so similar to each other anatomically that their skeletons are virtually indistinguishable.But their behaviors are known to be quite different: tigers hunt only as solitary individuals,whereas lions hunt in packs.Thus,paleontologists cannot reasonably infer solely on the basis of skeletal anatomy that extinct predatory animals,such as certain dinosaurs,hunted in packs. The conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

(A) The skeletons of lions and tigers are at least somewhat similar in structure in certain key respects to the skeletons of at least some extinct predatory animals.
(B) There have existed at least two species of extinct predatory dinosaurs that were so similar to each other that their skeletal anatomy is virtually indistinguishable.
(C) If skeletal anatomy alone is ever an inadequate basis for inferring a particular species’ hunting behavior,then it is never reasonable to infer,based on skeletal anatomy alone,that a species of animals hunted in packs.
(D) If any two animal species with virtually indistinguishable skeletal anatomy exhibit quite different hunting behaviors,then it is never reasonable to infer,based solely on the hunting behavior of those species,that the two species have the same skeletal anatomy.
(E) If it is unreasonable to infer,solely on the basis of differences in skeletal anatomy,that extinct animals of two distinct species differed in their hunting behavior,then the skeletal remains of those two species are virtually indistinguishable.

It is given that the skeletons of lions and tigers are indistinguishable. But lions and tigers have one distinguishable feature which is their behaviour. Lions hunt in packs unlike tigers who hunt only as solitary individuals. Thus, we can infer that skeletal anatomy alone is not sufficient to infer a specie's hunting behaviour.
Now the conclusion is: Paleontologists cannot reasonably infer solely on the basis of skeletal anatomy that extinct predatory animals,such as certain dinosaurs,hunted in packs.
To come to this conclusion, we need an assumption which will connect the conclusion with something from the given arguments. That is, we need something without which the argument will fall apart. Only option (C) supports this, as it connects the conclusion with our inference. (in bold). If we negate this option, then we wont be able to derive the conclusion.

If you like my post, please encourage by giving KUDOS.
Biologist: Lions and tigers are &nbs [#permalink] 05 May 2017, 09:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by