Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 21:58 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 21:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Long Passagex   Sciencex                  
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 6617 [67]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [32]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 121
Own Kudos [?]: 790 [0]
Given Kudos: 56
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 31 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Hello ,

Yes the answers are straight forward but can some one help me in understanding the flow for theory A in the passage.

Proponents of theory A dispute the assumption that a school of thousands of fish is highly visible. Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group, the spheres of visibility overlap. Thus the chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater than the chance of the predator finding a single fish swimming alone.

People in favor of theory A first dispute that School is highly visible and then they conclude that chance predator finding the school is slightly greater than finding individual fish.
To me the two statements seems to oppose rather than support .

Where am I going wrong ?
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1267
Own Kudos [?]: 5650 [3]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Main idea:

Author is trying to provide two theories why schooling occurs among fishes. author gave two theories, which are about protection from predetors.

Tone: author is not biased and just gave two theories.

A)Theory B stats that how movement of different fish can save them.
B)This can be answered from main idea
C)Predators only go after distinct prey. fish take advantage of this revolve around to confuse them.
D)Go with the tone of the passage.
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 451
Own Kudos [?]: 362 [3]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
3
Kudos
priyanshu14 wrote:
Please support in Q.No. 4 of this passage. Option B: Analysis seems to be more suitable?



4. The author is primarily concerned with
(A) discussing different theories--yes theory A and B
(B) analyzing different techniques--only one technique is mentioned that is "schooling"
(C) defending two hypotheses--author is not defending anything
(D) refuting established beliefs--he is not refuting any belief
(E) revealing new evidence---no new evidence is outlined rather exisiting theory is discussed..

Hope it helped....
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Jul 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Q4. The author is primarily concerned with
A. discussing different theories
B. analyzing different techniques
C. defending two hypotheses
D. refuting established beliefs
E. revealing new evidence

Why is A correct?
The author only discussed 2 theories. I got confused and marked C.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Posts: 792
Own Kudos [?]: 683 [1]
Given Kudos: 1316
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Shivangi24 wrote:
Q4. The author is primarily concerned with
A. discussing different theories
B. analyzing different techniques
C. defending two hypotheses
D. refuting established beliefs
E. revealing new evidence

Why is A correct?
The author only discussed 2 theories. I got confused and marked C.



Hi Shivangi24,

True, the author discusses only two theories, but he is discussing different theories right. Author is not defending anything, he is simply explaining how each theory attempts to explain why schooling of fish occurs in so many fish species. Thus making A the correct choice.

Hope This Helps.
Thanks.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2020
Posts: 216
Own Kudos [?]: 85 [1]
Given Kudos: 254
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
Schools: HEC'22 (J)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE:Consulting (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
1
Kudos
abhinav008 wrote:
Hello ,

Yes the answers are straight forward but can some one help me in understanding the flow for theory A in the passage.

Proponents of theory A dispute the assumption that a school of thousands of fish is highly visible. Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group, the spheres of visibility overlap. Thus the chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater than the chance of the predator finding a single fish swimming alone.

People in favor of theory A first dispute that School is highly visible and then they conclude that chance predator finding the school is slightly greater than finding individual fish.
To me the two statements seems to oppose rather than support .

Where am I going wrong ?


Hi abhinav008 the keyword here is only, proponents of theory A dispute the claim that schools are highly visible, they go on to defend their position and mentions that schools are not highly detectable but only slightly more detectable than a single fish.

I hope that helps
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Apr 2019
Status:Learning
Posts: 751
Own Kudos [?]: 583 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Send PM
Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
1
Kudos
RC#7 Long Passage {8 mins 4/4 correct}

Pharaphasing
Para 1: Advanced two theories to explain schooling of fish.
Para 2: Theory A
- Formation of compact group
- The chance of a predator finding the school is only slightly greater unless fish were dispersed throughout an area
Para 3: Critics of theory A
- School continues to be of value to its members even after detection.
Para 4: The "confusion effect" two different way
- Predators cannot decide which fish to attack first
- Sensory confusion caused by a large number of preys moving around the predator
- the movement of other prey in the school can be distracting

1. According to the passage,
theory B states that which of the following is a factor that enables a schooling fish to escape predators?

(A) The tendency of fish to form compact groups
Wrong: as mentioned in passage in para 2 “Experiments have shown that any fish can be seen, even in very clear water, only within a sphere of 200 meters in diameter. When fish are in a compact group” refers to theory-A

(B) The movement of other fish within the school
Correct: as mentioned in Passage Para 4 about “sensory confusion” – “Even if the predator makes the decision to attack a particular fish, the movement of other prey in the school can be distracting”

(C) The inability of predators to detect schools
Wrong: as mentioned in passage 2 “a predator's chance of finding any particular fish swimming in the school is much smaller than its chance of finding at least one of the same group of fish” refer to theory A

(D) The ability of fish to hide behind one another in a school
Wrong: Not mentioned in both the theory

(E) The great speed with which a school can disperse
Wrong: Not mentioned in both the theory


2. According to the passage, both theory A and theory B have been developed to explain how
(A) fish hide from predators by forming schools
Wrong: its not about hiding from predators, its is about protection from predators by confusing, illusion of making appear big than predators

(B) forming schools’ functions to protect fish from predators
Correct: as mentioned in passage para 1 last line “both theories assume that schooling offers the advantage of some protection from predators“

(C) schooling among fish differs from other protective behaviors
Wrong: differ from other protective behaviors not mentioned, only one is mentioned to protect from predator

(D) small fish are able to make rapid decisions
Wrong: Easy elimination, this is not mentioned in passage

(E) small fish are able to survive in an environment densely populated by large predators
Wrong: No, the passage refer only discussion about the protection from predators, large and small variations not mentioned in the passage.


3. According to one explanation of the "confusion effect," a fish that swims in a school will have greater advantages for survival if it

(A) tends to be visible for no more than 200 meters
Wrong: this is in refers of theory A

(B) stays near either the front or the rear of a school
Wrong: it has to a part of school, either the front or the rear, makes no importance.

(C) is part of a small school rather than a large school
Wrong: Small school and large school advantages & disadvantages not mentioned in the passage

(D) is very similar in appearance to the other fish in the school
Correct: as mentioned in the passage in para 4 “In many schools the fish are almost identical in appearance, making it difficult for a predator to select one.”

(E) is medium-sized
Wrong: Easy elimination, Not mentioned in the passage.


4. The author is primarily concerned with
(A) discussing different theories
Correct: passage mentioned theory A and theory B, and there some views from Proponents and critics

(B) analysing different techniques
Wrong: there is no detailed examination of the techniques or structure of something

(C) defending two hypotheses
Wrong: No defending of any supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation

(D) refuting established beliefs
Wrong: There is no negative or counter argument mentioned in the passage to be disprove

(E) revealing new evidence
Wrong: Passage brief only about two theory, no new evidence mentioned in the passage
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
2 theories why schooling occurs--both assume protection from predators
Theory A--predator's chance of finding a fish in school<finding one if dispersed
Theory B--"Confusion effect"- 2 explanations
---1) pred cannot decide
---2) sensory confusion
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32846 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Official Explanation


1. According to the passage, theory B states that which of the following is a factor that enables a schooling fish to escape predators?

Difficulty Level: Easy

Explanation

Supporting idea
This question depends on understanding what the passage states about theory B, the “confusion effect.”
One element of theory B is that predators may experience sensory confusion created by large numbers of moving fish in a school.

A. The compactness of groups of schooling fish is an element of theory A, not theory B.

B. Correct. It is the movement of schooling fish around a predator that creates sensory confusion in the predator; this movement may distract the predator and help protect individual fish in the school.

C. According to the passage’s description of theory A, predators are actually slightly more likely to detect schools than they are to detect individual fish.

D. Theory B does not involve fish hiding behind one another but rather moving around the predator.

E. The passage does not discuss the speed of dispersal of schools of fish.

Answer: B
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32846 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Official Explanation


2. According to the passage, both theory A and theory B have been developed to explain how

Difficulty Level: Easy

Explanation

Supporting idea

The passage states in its first paragraph that two theories were developed to explain why schooling occurs in so many fish species and that they both assume that schooling helps protect fish from predators.

A. While theory A involves an explanation of how schooling makes an individual fish less likely to be found by predators, theory B explains how schooling protects fish even when they are detected by predators.

B. Correct. Both theory A and theory B begin with the assumption that schooling provides protection
from predators, and each theory offers a different explanation for how that protection occurs.

C. The passage does not discuss protective behaviors other than schooling.

D. The decision-making ability of predators, not schooling fish, is discussed in the passage; schooling is presented as an instinctive behavior.

E. The passage suggests that only theory B helps explain schooling behavior in environments where many predators, large or otherwise, are found, and that theory A explains schooling in areas where predators are not as abundant.

Answer: B
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32846 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Official Explanation


3. According to one explanation of the "confusion effect," a fish that swims in a school will have greater advantages for survival if it

Difficulty Level: Easy

Explanation

Inference

The “confusion effect” is discussed in the third and fourth paragraphs. The first explanation of the “confusion effect” proposes that because predators prefer to select distinctive prey, they find it difficult to select one fish from among many that look the same.

A. The 200-meter visibility of fish is part of the explanation for theory A, not theory B (the “confusion effect”).

B. The location of an individual fish within a school is not discussed in the passage as being important to the “confusion effect.”

C. The size of a school of fish is not discussed as an element of the “confusion effect.”

D. Correct. Because predators, according to the “confusion effect,” prefer to select prey that is distinct from the rest of the school, a fish that is similar in appearance to the other fish in its school would most likely enjoy a survival advantage.

E. The size of a fish relative to the other fish in its school would most likely contribute to its ability to survive: that is, if it resembled other fish in size, it would be safer, based on what the passage says about the “confusion effect.” Furthermore, the passage gives no reason to think that merely being medium-sized would confer any advantage (unless the other fish were medium-sized as well).

Answer: D
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13957
Own Kudos [?]: 32846 [0]
Given Kudos: 5775
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Official Explanation


4. The author is primarily concerned with

Difficulty Level: Easy

Explanation

Main idea

Determining the author’s primary concern depends on understanding the focus of the passage as a whole. The author presents two theories that purport to account for why fish, particularly small fish, tend to school and explains the arguments of proponents of each theory.

A. Correct. The author discusses two theories—identified as theory A and theory B—that account for the tendency of fish to school.

B. The author is not concerned with different techniques in the passage.

C. The two theories of why the fish school could be referred to as hypotheses, but the author is not primarily concerned with defending them; rather, the passage explains how each attempts to account for the phenomenon in question.

D. The author presents, rather than refutes, beliefs about why fish tend to school.

E. The author reveals no evidence, new or otherwise, in the passage. The passage is a general discussion of scientific opinions based on existing evidence.

Answer: B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2022
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 2.35
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Yippie! First RC ever, where all answers are correct.
7 Minutes...
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Biologists have advanced two theories to explain why schooling of fish [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne