It is currently 17 Mar 2018, 23:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur sp

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 89
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.41
Re: Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur sp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Dec 2017, 03:06
AbdurRakib wrote:
Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur species with which they share distinctive structural features. The fossil record, however, shows that this cannot be so, since there are bird fossils much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils that have been found.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A) The birdlike dinosaurs have no descendants.
B) There are no flightless dinosaur species that have the distinctive structural features shred by birds and birdlike dinosaurs.
C) There are no birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older that the bird fossils but have nit yet been unearthed.
D) It could not have been the case that some birds were descendant from one of the bird like dinosaur species and other birds from another.
E) Birds cannot have been descended from dinosaur species with which the birds do not share the distinctive structural features.

OG 2017 New Question

Pre thinking can really help you with this sort of questions, read the premise and then conclusion. Now think this way, okay the conclusion is (since there are bird fossils much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils that have been found.)
What can be the reason which negates this. maybe all fossils of birdlike dinosaurs have not been found??.

And you will notice it is the option C

Its not always that what you pre think will be among the options but it gives you the idea of what lines to follow on. Powerfull tool to have for CR.
SVP
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 2140
Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur sp [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2018, 16:23
Expert's post
Top Contributor
AbdurRakib wrote:
Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur species with which they share distinctive structural features. The fossil record, however, shows that this cannot be so, since there are bird fossils much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils that have been found.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A) The birdlike dinosaurs have no descendants.
B) There are no flightless dinosaur species that have the distinctive structural features shared by birds and birdlike dinosaurs.
C) There are no birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils but have not yet been unearthed.
D) It could not have been the case that some birds were descendant from one of the bird like dinosaur species and other birds from another.
E) Birds cannot have been descended from dinosaur species with which the birds do not share the distinctive structural features.

OG 2017 New Question

This is an assumption question.

PREMISE: Some believe that birds descended from dinosaurs
PREMISE: There are bird fossils much older than the earliest birdlike dinosaur fossils found.
CONCLUSION: Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaurs

First try to identify an assumption that the author needs in order for the conclusion be valid.
If you can't think of one, you may need to resort to the negation method
So, we'll negate each answer choice.
The answer choice that, when negated, DESTROYS the argument will be the correct answer.

A) The birdlike dinosaurs do have descendants.
Does this destroy the conclusion that Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaur?
No. It makes no difference where the birdlike dinosaurs came from.
ELIMINATE A

B) There ARE flightless dinosaur species that have the distinctive structural features shared by birds and birdlike dinosaurs.
Does this destroy the conclusion that Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaur?
No, the argument is about whether birds have DESCENDED from birdlike dinosaurs.
ELIMINATE B

C) There ARE birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils but have not yet been unearthed.
Does this destroy the conclusion that Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaur?
YES! The author's argument is based on the fact that there are no discovered birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than bird fossils.
So, if there ARE birdlike dinosaur fossils that are older than the bird fossils, then this KILLS the author's conclusion.
KEEP C

D) It COULD have been the case that some birds were descendant from one of the bird like dinosaur species and other birds from another.
Does this destroy the conclusion that Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaur?
No. The word COULD doesn't have the certainty required to destroy an argument.
ELIMINATE D

E) Birds MAY have descended from dinosaur species with which the birds do not share the distinctive structural features.
Does this destroy the conclusion that Birds did NOT descend from birdlike dinosaur?
No. The conclusion is all about birds descending from birdlike dinosaurs
ELIMINATE E

Cheers,
Brent
_________________

Brent Hanneson – Founder of gmatprepnow.com

Birds have been said to be descended from certain birdlike dinosaur sp   [#permalink] 03 Mar 2018, 16:23

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by