It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 21:01

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

Author Message
Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2006, 08:13
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2006, 09:20
Wow, a tough one! The argument is of the following type:

Scope shift & understanding the numbers.

I'm very uncertain about this answer, and was left to choose between B & C. B seemed to be out of scope. The others:

A â€“ Out of scope. Other infections is not discussed.
D â€“ Out of scope. The argument discusses the issue of the screening test. No comparison made to population at large.
E â€“ how often (=frequency) they supply blood is not part of the argument.

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Tashkent, Uzbekistan

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2006, 10:25
It should be A. A prevents a situation to reduce the other 10%.
_________________

A man made for challenging himself!

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 495

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Location: Europe

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2006, 10:35
Of course 'A'.

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2006, 07:36
Yes the OA is A
The officials are giving figures for the number of people giving donations on the assumption that they will not reject people only having this infection. They are not looking at other infections that can happen, which can lead to more people getting rejected.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

06 Apr 2006, 07:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by