Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 06:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2006, 19:49
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.
(B) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.
(C) The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.
(D) The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.
(E) The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors.

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1122
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

01 May 2006, 19:54
It should be B.

If the donors carrying NANB virus do not develop the disease themselves then it is difficult to screen them for that particular virus.
And hence the claim that "....blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. "
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 156
Location: Europe
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 02:44
i will go fo E
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 03:32
everything except E is out of scope
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 03:47
A, on second thought

Since 10% left, and this is exactly two-thirds , no one of them was screened out by other tests.
Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 135
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 06:57
Very confusing. I would choose E.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 09:20
deowl wrote:
A, on second thought

Since 10% left, and this is exactly two-thirds , no one of them was screened out by other tests.

Can you explain reason behind it?
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 75
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 09:31
Ok, I seem to be missing something here. I think it is C!
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 10:05
gmat_crack wrote:
deowl wrote:
A, on second thought

Since 10% left, and this is exactly two-thirds , no one of them was screened out by other tests.

Can you explain reason behind it?

The author estimates that 10%, which is exactly two-thirds of the the initial persentage, of infected donors will still supply their blood after
the screening tests. So he most probably assumes that no other tests
will disqualify those who passed the NANB test.
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 75
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 10:11
What is the OA?
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1692
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 10:41
"A" by negation.

A) Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.

Negation: Donors carrying NANB hepatitis, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed. ==> It means the donors carrying NANB hepatitis, will be disqualified by other "reliable" tests & successs rate will be very high.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 156
Location: Europe
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 11:10
Plz show me the OA
VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1343
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 11:24
deowl wrote:
gmat_crack wrote:
deowl wrote:
A, on second thought.
Since 10% left, and this is exactly two-thirds , no one of them was screened out by other tests.

Can you explain reason behind it?

The author estimates that 10%, which is exactly two-thirds of the the initial persentage, of infected donors will still supply their blood after
the screening tests. So he most probably assumes that no other tests
will disqualify those who passed the NANB test.

yes, agree with A.

if A is assumed then those disqualified weren't screened out by any other reason other than NANB hepatitis. i mean the reason behind the disqualifications is due to NANB hepatitis.

really tough........
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 474
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 12:05
Guys its great.

OA is A
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1122
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 19:27
Good one.
Now I understand after vivek's explaination why it should be A.
VP
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1057
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2006, 22:08
Agree with A
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

02 May 2006, 22:08
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 2 24 Jul 2009, 03:20
1 Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 7 11 Feb 2009, 05:47
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 13 08 May 2008, 06:31
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 13 07 Apr 2008, 08:06
Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB 10 11 Jun 2007, 04:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.