It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 15:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2007, 22:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis. Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis. Therefore, about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood.

Q. The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed.

B. Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, develop the disease themselves at any point.

C. The estimate of the number of donors who would be disqualified by tests for NANB hepatitis is an underestimate.

D. The incidence of NANB hepatitis is lower among the potential blood donors than it is in the population at large.

E. The donors who will still supply NANB-contaminated blood will donate blood at the average frequency for all donors

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2007, 23:15
A.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2003
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2007, 23:16
E.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2007, 23:19
Actually, I rescind my choice of A and go with E also. I was originally thinking that individulals with hepitisis would be more likely to have other diseases that are easier to screen and thus would be picked out, but that's not what the question is asking.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 852

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2007, 10:10
sludge wrote:
Actually, I rescind my choice of A and go with E also. I was originally thinking that individulals with hepitisis would be more likely to have other diseases that are easier to screen and thus would be picked out, but that's not what the question is asking.

You were correct originally sludge...you gave the right reason also...Negate A and you will find the answer...A it is.

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 542

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

Schools: MIT Sloan

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2007, 10:34
go with A

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2005
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2007, 16:56
I don't know why "A" is the answer..
Other infection is related to NANB hepatitis?
I go with "E"..

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2007, 17:21
how is this not B?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 111

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2007, 18:07
A.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2007, 10:29
I like E

if the donors increase the amount of blood giving , it will skew the results , since the amount of tainted blood would be increased even though the percentage of people who carry the disease remain the same

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2007, 04:45
Facts:- Blood banks will shortly start to screen all donors for NANB hepatitis
- Although the new screening tests are estimated to disqualify up to 5 percent of all prospective blood donors, they will still miss two-thirds of donors carrying NANB hepatitis
Conclusion:
- about 10 percent of actual donors will still supply NANB-contaminated blood

Let's look at the options
A - Assumption is correct.
Donors carrying NANB hepatitis do not, in a large percentage of cases, carry other infections for which reliable screening tests are routinely performed. If they do then they would be caught in the more reliable tests and hence the percentage would go down.

B - Eliminate - No evidence of about developing a disease.
C - Eliminate - No evidence of under-estimating or over estimating.
D - Eliminate - Out of scope - Population at large
E - Eliminate - No evidence of frequency.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

11 Jun 2007, 04:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by