It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 16:40

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Book publishers have traditionally published a few books

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Book publishers have traditionally published a few books [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 00:35
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

35% (00:44) correct 65% (01:17) wrong based on 18 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 197 [1], given: 22

Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2010, 19:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

Applying the classical PowerScore procedure of solving CR questions -

A and D are too exaggerated in stating "have always been". Stay away from over-hype. C does not explain how some books of intrinsic value generating sizable profit unexpectedly in the past is related to the publishers becoming more interested in only making more money. E on the other hand strengthens the conclusion, by stating that profits have been declining, it can easily be understood that publishers are looking to make more money.

After thus eliminating all other options - B is the sole contender. In other words, it is not that publishers are more interested in making more money but rather, the decline in good books that makes it seem like the publishers are getting greedier.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Kudos [?]: 197 [1], given: 22

Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 08:49
B

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 09:19
Another B. OA pls

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 12:25
could be C

but doubt with the words: 'unlikely' in the question and 'unexpectedly' in the answer

but if something is unlikely to happen ... and it happens ... then it is said to have happened unexpectedly ...

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 14:21
I think answer is C. OA please?

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2010, 21:40
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

IMO "C".

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Intern
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 04:25
IMHO D, since this introduce another reason why publication of intrinsic books could have reduced.
OA please?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 7

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 04:57
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

+1 for B
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Kudos [?]: 289 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 05:02
Is it :A

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Tuck Thread Master
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 69

Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2010, 05:31
I'm considering (C) - Number of good quality books with intrinsic merits has decreased, publishers stayed the same

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 69

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 417

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2010, 00:53
Why not E?

If the publishers profits have been declining over the years, they can no longer "afford" publishing the books, which they believe brings no profit but just expense. If they were doing it out of charity before, now as their profits are decreasing, they no longer can afford to do so.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2010, 15:43
Can anybody please tell me what the official answer is?

My answer is A. The reason:

1. The conclusion says "nowadays, more than ever, book publishers ....."
2. I need to find a reason as to why it is not really profit that motivates book publishers nowadays especially as compared to before.

A answered this criterion best.

If the Official answer (is this what is being abbreviated as OA?) is something else, can you please explain?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 924

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2010, 00:42
OA is B

Kudos [?]: 267 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 2

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2010, 09:47
joemama142000 wrote:
Book publishers have traditionally published a few books that they thought were of intrinsic merit even though these books were unlikely to make a profit. Nowadays, however, fewer of these books are being published. It seems, therefore, that publishers now, more than ever, are more interested in making money than in publishing books of intrinsic value.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Book publishers have always been interested in making money
B) There has been a notable decline in the quality of books written in recent years
C) In the past, often books of intrinsic value would unexpectedly make a sizable profit
D) There have always been authors unwilling to be published unless a profit is guaranteed
E) In recent years, profits in the book publishing industry have been declining

In B, it suggests that there is another factor(quality decline) to the fewer of these book publication: not because publishers more interested in making money.
_________________

I am not born to be a GENIUS nor a GMATTER. If you are struggling, we are in the same boat. Fight to the last!!

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2010
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2010, 00:17
+1 for B

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Book Publishers have traditionally published   [#permalink] 29 Jan 2010, 00:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Book publishers have traditionally published a few books

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.