It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 23:30

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Status: Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Posts: 531

Kudos [?]: 4320 [1], given: 217

Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 13:42
1
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (00:48) correct 25% (00:54) wrong based on 283 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,
E.

MGMAT 1 --> 530
MGMAT 2--> 640
MGMAT 3 ---> 610
GMAT ==> 730

Last edited by Bunuel on 28 Jan 2013, 07:19, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the OA

Kudos [?]: 4320 [1], given: 217

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42622

Kudos [?]: 135778 [12], given: 12711

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 13:52
12
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

\$35,000----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 135778 [12], given: 12711

Manager
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 14

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 Jun 2012, 00:34
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

\$35,000----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I believe that OA is wrong.
It should be D.

Kindly check the OA and edit it.

Bunuel - Your explanation is spot on.

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 14

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 07:11
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42622

Kudos [?]: 135778 [1], given: 12711

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 07:24
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
ethnix wrote:
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.

Welcome to GMAT Club.

Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000".

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 135778 [1], given: 12711

Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 07:27
Bunuel wrote:
ethnix wrote:
I am sorry, but the official answer does not make any sense for Statement 1. It is simply mathematically wrong.

Mathematically spoken the statement says: |Betty-50.000|<|Wilma-50.000| and not Betty-50.000 < Wilma-50.000
Let me make a numerical example. Betty earns 49.999 an Wilma earns 70.000. Obviously Betty's salary is closer than 50.000 though Wilma earns more. And the over way around: Let Betty earn 50.001 and Wilma 40.000, now still Betty's wage is closer to 50.000 though she now earns more than Wilma.

Stating that 1) is sufficient is simply wrong and I'm actually quite astonished people get away with such an answer so easily.

p.s.: The same argumentation holds for 2), so the correct answer must be C, as you can deduct from both statements that both wages must lie above 50.000; something you can't predict earlier.

Welcome to GMAT Club.

Your examples are not correct because we are told that "both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000".

Hope it's clear.

OMG, thanks. I suppose reading the question would avoid to most of my wrong answers :D

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 18

Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Insurance)
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 05:49
Hey guys just one small question.

If the test makers intended to say that Betty and Wilma's annual salaries put together was more than 50000 how could they have framed the question. I am non-native speaker so it kinda took me a while to know that they meant Betty > 50000 and Wilma > 50000. Plz help
_________________

Never give up, never celebrate, never leave your spot until it is finally over
We are winning this GMAT-war together

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 18

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42622

Kudos [?]: 135778 [1], given: 12711

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jul 2014, 05:54
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
janxavier wrote:
Hey guys just one small question.

If the test makers intended to say that Betty and Wilma's annual salaries put together was more than 50000 how could they have framed the question. I am non-native speaker so it kinda took me a while to know that they meant Betty > 50000 and Wilma > 50000. Plz help

It would be something like "combined salary of Betty and Wilma is more than \$50000" or "together Betty and Wilma earn annual salary of more than \$50000".
_________________

Kudos [?]: 135778 [1], given: 12711

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 33

Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Oct 2015, 04:38
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

\$35,000----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here.
My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely,
1) Distance between Betty's salary and \$35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary
1) Distance between Betty's salary and \$35,000 < Distance between \$35,000 and Wilma's salary

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 33

Current Student
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2672

Kudos [?]: 1789 [0], given: 797

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Oct 2015, 04:45
rakshithbabu wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

Notice that we are told that both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50,000.

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.

----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- So, as you can see Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

\$35,000----\$50,000---(Betty)----(Wilma)---- Again Wilma's annual salary is greater than Betty's. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

I got the answer correct, but got completely confused with statement 2. Took a while to understand, but both scenarios led to the same answer, so was lucky here.
My doubt here is between the two interpretations of statement 2. Namely,
1) Distance between Betty's salary and \$35,000 < Distance between Betty's salary and Wilma's salary
2) Distance between Betty's salary and \$35,000 < Distance between \$35,000 and Wilma's salary

Let me try to help.

First of, do not waste time in doubting the official questions. I agree the placement of "it" is kind of ambiguous but both the versions (it=Betty's and it=35000) will lead to the same conclusion of Betty's salary < Wilma's salary as we are given that both the salaries are >50000.

Kudos [?]: 1789 [0], given: 797

Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4481

Kudos [?]: 3160 [0], given: 0

GPA: 3.82
Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Oct 2015, 10:51
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$50000. Is Wilma's annual salary greater than Betty's?

(1) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$50,000 than is Wilma's.
(2) Betty's annual salary is closer to \$35,000 than it is to Wilma's annual salary.

In the original condition, we can let Betty's annual salary=b, Wilma's annual salary=w. Then, there are 2 variables and 3 equations from the question and the conditions, so there is high chance (D) will be our answer.
Condition 1 is sufficient as it answers the question 'yes'
Condition 2 is also sufficient for the same reason, so the answer becomes (D).

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
“Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily”
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself

Kudos [?]: 3160 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14826

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000 [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Nov 2017, 09:49
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 288 [0], given: 0

Re: Both Betty and Wilma earn annual salaries of more than \$5000   [#permalink] 20 Nov 2017, 09:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by