It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 10:45

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Mar 2006, 16:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

184. Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Mar 2006, 06:07
But (B) reads more active than E. Besides, ~on the grounds of~ is idiomatic.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42

Show Tags

05 Mar 2006, 08:43
This one stumped me for a while, but I'll go with B!

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

Show Tags

06 Mar 2006, 01:28
Going for B. E is a little wordy whereas B is more concise.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Mar 2006, 02:01
Hmm tricky one!

I think it should be B although E would have been my choice if it wasn't for the "because" in there. That just ruins it!

What the sentence is trying to convey is that "building large ... would be wasteful if avoiding duplicated facilities was the only good reason to do so. But for a better reason it might not be wasteful." Hence E sounds promising. But the use of "because" is very awkward.

Choices C and D use the wrong tense. Hence they are ruled out. Between A and B, B is more active and precise.

Hence B!
_________________

Try and try until you succeed! There is just no giving up!

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Mar 2006, 11:20
OA is E

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

06 Mar 2006, 21:35
hellom3p wrote:
OA is E

Are you sure?
I am losing my confidence little bit....
Someone please explain why is E an OA?

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 10:45
b14kumar wrote:
hellom3p wrote:
OA is E

Are you sure?
I am losing my confidence little bit....
Someone please explain why is E an OA?

Yes, I am sure....That's why I posted the question.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 621

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 11:28
hellom3p wrote:
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

This is a usage about which I havent heard so far !! .. if only beacuse .. interesting

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 17:22
selene wrote:
hellom3p wrote:
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

This is a usage about which I havent heard so far !! .. if only beacuse .. interesting

Some of our friends thinks its subjunctive case:
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=19906

interesting SC. I could have never got it right
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1337

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

08 Mar 2006, 18:58
hellom3p wrote:
184. Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

i think this is one of the most posted questions. I donot think it is a case of subjunctive.

Paul did a good job here: http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=7171

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

09 Mar 2006, 06:04
I don't think it's a subjunctive case.

Here is how, I decoded it.

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided.

For it to sound good, we can put part after comma first...

if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided, building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources.

if only because X has to be done, doing Y would cause something else.

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

09 Mar 2006, 06:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.