It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 05:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: VA
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 20:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:18) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.

(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: VA

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 21:53
Any help would be appreciated

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 22:15
Sorry you had to wait long for your answer. i will just jump in here to help the discussion.

IMO, the answer is E. If you do not mind, I will let others explain first.

Praet

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: VA

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 22:20
Thanks Praet.

Yes, let others also try it out

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Location: san jose,ca

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 22:41
I will go with B.

E - I'm not sure about the sentence structure
_________________

GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 01:45
I guess "on the grounds that" is correct idiom

Hence B is out

Between C and E I go for C
E seems too wordy!

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 02:03
I opt for C too. It offers a clear idea.

Duplication of facilities is the sufficient condition not to build hospitals in such areas.

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 02:05
I still think E is best.

This is what i would call a 'meaning' question. Apart from the grammar rules, you are tested on what sentence fragment actually makes the correct sense.

Lets turn E around.

If only because duplication of facilities should be avoided, building new hospitals in the new bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources.

In other words, Its like saying,

[If your only criterion is no duplication of facilities, then building new hospitals in the new bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources.]

Another way of explaining it is:

[ Hospitals already exist , so if you build new hospitals , it would duplicate facilities and would consitute an wasteful use of resources]

IMO, E conveys the intended meaning clearly. Other choices fall way short of introducing the conditional clause necessary for the sentence to make sense.

Praet

Kudos [?]: 919 [0], given: 781

Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 02:10

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 87

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: VA

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 12:11
E is the OA.

Thanks for the explanations

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 22:08
"if only because" = "just for the reason that"

I think that should make it clear.

- ash
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

14 Jul 2004, 22:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by