It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 20:59

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 21

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jun 2012, 23:12
Hi

I shortlisted my choices between A and E,

A-Consumer borrowing is different than business borrowing, So Govt will not have funds to provide loan to business- Govt. Plan failed
E-The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for
a given increase in their retirement savings- Means it is helpful as retirement saving will have flat saving for all income level people

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 21

Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 17

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 07:50
1
KUDOS
salil wrote:

I'm not saying that A is wrong. But the explanation still doesn't rule C out.

As per my response above, The plan would fail because people won't put more money than is currently in a retirement savings account in spite of changes to the tax structure.

I think the reason that OG quotes is not good enough to rule out option C.

As my undertanding. "Some" is pretty close to the "few", perhaps 30%. Clearly, "some" doesn't represnting "most". Furthermore, (C) gives us some weaken but not strong enough compare with (A). Remeber, we have to determine which one is "most weaken" the argument. In other words, partially weaken is not a correct answer(same to the strengthen question). Thus, C out and A is the best!

I got better explaination from another site, but not sure if I can post link here.

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 17

Manager
Status: exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 187

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 10:53
so the author says that the money in form of taxes shall be used for the business

but as the money collected as taxes will again reach the people
as their demand for the loans will increase proportionately with the increased taxex the money available for business shall not increase and hence
the govt fails
_________________

just one more month for exam...

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 22

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Dec 2012, 16:03
rajeevrks27 wrote:
C is so attractive that i too fell in its trap
yes guys thanx 4 explaning why A is correct.....

I fell for the trap too. As someone already mentioned, the key to eliminating answer choice C is noticing that "some will not save" so we can assume that some will save. I think if the answer choice indicated that nobody would save, that may be a problem.

I didnt like A initially because It seemed to strengthen the argument instead of weakening it. What I missed was the language shift in the answer choice.

Consumers save more, so Consumers borrow more. I mistakingly equated consumers with businesses...

Hopefully someone else doesn't repeat the same mistake...

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 22

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1393

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Feb 2013, 07:00
the argument of this type: if x increase/decrease, y will increase/decrease

prethink : assumption is y depends only x

weakener: y depends on other factor z which can change y

look for other factor

A match.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 6

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Mar 2013, 10:38
I'm still struggling to figure out why A.

Is it because A states the word "correspondingly"? Without this word is A still valid?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 25

Schools: LBS '14, IMD '16
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Apr 2013, 13:33
Lets compare

Inorder to weakening the conclusion , need to attack any of the following

giving tax incentives => no increase in borrowing => helping business
1 2 3

(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases
correspondingly.
this attacks 2 , directly .
DONT think that consumer borrowing is not same as business borrowing . DONT APPLY YOUR LOGIC. Consumer can be running business . He is as consumer of the borrowed money.

(C) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
Why this is wrong?
simply because of 'some' . If is was 'all' instead of some then this is more likely ans then A (but this is unlikely on GMAT)

wow, question was raised in 2009 and im ans in 2013
_________________

Your Kudos will motivate me :)

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 25

Director
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 879

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 57

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Sep 2013, 09:34
sagarsabnis wrote:
Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the
government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger
portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such
accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.
Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's
plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?
(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases
correspondingly.
(8) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not
offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
(e) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are
insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for
a given increase in their retirement savings.

Please some one explain this...as i am not convinced with the explanation from OG

A it is....

But E too got a effect....Since the tax benefit is same for everyone regardless of their income...It will only encourage people who have less salary than to people who are in the highest slab...

Because they might think that what is the use to put the money in this plan since we are not getting any extra benefit...

But we dont have to choose the correct answer, we need to choose the best out of it..
_________________

Kudos [?]: 245 [0], given: 57

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 412

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 34

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jan 2014, 17:23
garimavyas wrote:
C states 'Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.'

but that also means some people will choose to increase their levels of retirement savings, hence funds available for borrowing will still increase. and that increase amount will be available for businesses to borrow.

so C doesn't weaken the conclusion .

A states that number of borrowers will increase , this may result in even lesser funds for businesses to borrow than were previously available.

hence A seriously weakens the conclusion
Nice explanation. I understand that A is correct. I have another question for you all.. Will this modified version of B act as a weakener for this question?
B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 34

Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 623

Kudos [?]: 535 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jan 2014, 17:55
sagarsabnis wrote:
Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the
government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger
portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such
accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.
Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's
plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?
(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases
correspondingly.
(8) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not
offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
(e) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are
insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for
a given increase in their retirement savings.

Please some one explain this...as i am not convinced with the explanation from OG

The negated conclusion is: More money is NOT available to the borrowers

Choice A offers the best explanation for this because it says that now there are more borrowers and so more money would actually not be available to the borrowers.
_________________

Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com/regularcourse.php

Standardized Approaches

Kudos [?]: 535 [0], given: 16

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10133

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

10 May 2014, 04:04
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 31 Mar 2014
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: IIMA (PGPX)
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2014, 20:04
Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the
government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger
portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such
accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Conclusion: More money becomes available to borrowers.
Assumption: The money is used by businesses only.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's
plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?
(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases
correspondingly.
Yes. suppose bank has 1000 bucks in the fund. It is planning to give to 500 to businesses. It possible that many normal people applied for loans and eaten into the share of businesses.

(8) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not
offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
We are not even bother about losses during the first year of plan. out of scope
(e) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
This is the most tricky and misleading answer to the question. Be extra careful with some. Inorder for a plan to work it is not mandatory for everyone to agree. There will always be some outliers. As long as majority agree the plans get along. (Welcome to democracy )
(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are
insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
Some people reason this way. There is money with business but businesses are not good enough to get that money. The conclusion is about more money will be available or not, but not about how banks grant money. These is play of words. One can write many such answer choices such as business fritter away money after taking loans. The scope is conclusion money is available or not

(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for
a given increase in their retirement savings.
Sorry i'm not looking into tax slabs here. Out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 591

Kudos [?]: 482 [0], given: 200

Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2014, 13:06
We have here 2 points:
1) Money amount in the pot increases
2) This increased money amount reaches the right group of borrowers

--> We have 1) Money amount in the pot increases BUT we miss here 2) as consumer borrowing increases CORRESPONDINGLY so it +/- 0 for business borrowers, the don't get more money --> This argument most weakens the intended plan
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Kudos [?]: 482 [0], given: 200

Current Student
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 175

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 120

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 08:56
Fact1: Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans.
Fact 2: To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts
Conclusion: Because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

If we can prove that even if govt plan implemented successfully, the no of borrowers increase or intended saving money not increase then it weakens the conclusion.
Option A does it.

Option C is wrong that even if some people chose not to save, still other people will be saving money
_________________

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 120

Current Student
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 137

Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q41 V31
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Oct 2014, 05:46
Whats wrong with D?
If more money is put into the retirement savings, the effective money to be available for use by the business will be less. He would then reach bank for loan, and the bank denies his loan sanction because he can't repay the loan with his effective monthly earning. Thus no borrowing even when saving! :/

Any explanations?
_________________

Its not over..

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 137

Current Student
Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 294

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 413

Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V31
GMAT 2: 640 Q44 V34
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.58
WE: Analyst (Accounting)
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2014, 20:40
Good question. +1. Let me attempt a good explanation now!

I've made some key words in each option in bold and have entered my comments inline in blue as to why each wrong answer is wrong and why the correct one is correct.
F2: Govt thinks --> more retirement savings causes more money available for borrowers (just borrowers and not only business borrowers)
C: If more money is available to lend, more money will be available for development loans for businesses (which are suffering)

NOTE:
a) Whenever we have a X will cause Y weakener, in 99.99% of the cases, we just have to prove that Y won't happen
b) Whenever we have a X causes/may cause Y weakener, in 99.99% of the cases, we just have to prove that either Y caused X or that Z caused Y

We have case (b) here. We just have to prove that X will not cause Y (more money will be available for businesses which are suffering for development)

Now let's skim!

sagarsabnis wrote:
Businesses are suffering because of a lack of money available for development loans. To help businesses, the government plans to modify the income-tax structure in order to induce individual taxpayers to put a larger portion of their incomes into retirement savings accounts, because as more money is deposited in such
accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

Which of the following, if true, raises the most serious doubt regarding the effectiveness of the government's
plan to increase the amount of money available for development loans for businesses?

(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly. This looks like a match to our pre phase. X will not cause Y because it causes Z. HOLD

(B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.Nothing to do with our pre phrase. OUT

(C) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings. Only some people won't. Still if majority invest that might help the Government. This probably strengthens the argument. OUT

(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules. Increased savings leads to more money available for lending. But that doesn't mean that the bank will lend money just for the sake of lending. There is no incentive for the bank to lend for a poor business too. Possible trap answer. We have a clear A so far. Let's HOLD to it IF we find a flaw in A

(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for a given increase in their retirement savings. Okay I am interested in money available for lending and not savings. SCOPE SHIFT. OUT

Please some one explain this...as i am not convinced with the explanation from OG

So now between A & D. A fits my pre phrase amazingly well and has no flaws in my eyes whereas D does. So A it is!
_________________

Cheers!!

JA
If you like my post, let me know. Give me a kudos!

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 413

Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2014
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 66

Concentration: Marketing
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2014, 23:10
(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases
correspondingly.
If people borrow more then there might not be anymore money to give out for loans

(B) The increased tax revenue the government would receive as a result of business expansion would not offset the loss in revenue from personal income taxes during the first year of the plan.
The revenue is irrelevant folks investing more into their personal retirement savings.

(e) Even with tax incentives, some people will choose not to increase their levels of retirement savings.
Even with some the businesses can still achieve their goal.

(D) Bankers generally will not continue to lend money to businesses whose prospective earnings are
insufficient to meet their loan repayment schedules.
They don't have to loan more money. They just need to have the funds to back up the loans they do give out.

(E) The modified tax structure would give all taxpayers, regardless of their incomes, the same tax savings for
a given increase in their retirement savings.
This can still add more funds to the loans.

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 66

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 93

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 13

Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Mar 2015, 21:42
Explanation for choice A

Type: weaken

Conclusion: increase personal retirement taxes => give more money available for loan.

Assumption: increase retirement taxes cause more money available

Break assumption: increase retirement taxes do not cause redundance in loans or do cause money available for loan reduced. Hence choice A is the most logical option.

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 13

Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Mar 2015, 18:59
The logic of the argument:
+ Fact: Lack of money available for development loans --> Businesses are suffering.
+ Goverment plan: Modify the tax income structure --> Increase retirement savings --> More money available for loans.
The effectiveness of the plan depends on the assumption that more retirement savings mean more money available for loans.
The answer should weaken the assumption.
A - It implies that even more money is put on retirement saving accounts, this amount of money will be shared for consumer borrowings and there is no guarantee that money left for businesses loans will increase.
B - No impact on the conclusion.
C - The conclusion deals w the majority, not w some.
D - The matter in the argument is the lack of money to lend general businesses, not the problematic businesses.
E - No impact.
so, A is CORRECT.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 21

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jul 2015, 02:29
ykaiim wrote:
Even I marked C but I doubt the OA in OG. The last line of argument says that -

because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to borrowers.

While A says that -
(A) When levels of personal retirement savings increase, consumer borrowing always increases correspondingly.

This is ambiguous. I think to make this a correct argument, the last line of the passage should have been -
because as more money is deposited in such accounts, more money becomes available to bankers/lenders.

You were on the right track with this thinking. With more deposits, more money is available for borrowers.
The money increases uniformly for all borrowers - businesses and consumers.

We want to find a doubt regarding the plans effectiveness to increase the amount of money available for developmental loans for businesses.

A) says, with higher savings, consumer borrowings increase.

Hence:

1) Increase in savings = more money for borrowers
2) More money = increased consumer borrowing

Therefore, consumer borrowing cuts into the share of developmental loans for businesses, and therefore, the government's plan would fail.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Business are suffering because of a lack of money available for develo   [#permalink] 16 Jul 2015, 02:29

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5    Next  [ 90 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by