It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 00:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586

Kudos [?]: 273 [1], given: 0

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2005, 16:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
30
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:03) correct 45% (01:09) wrong based on 422 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by mau5 on 28 Nov 2013, 00:06, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA

Kudos [?]: 273 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 373

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2005, 08:05
WinWinMBA wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of


I would go for A.
"public of /public disclosure and disclosure off" don't get well with the rest of the sentence.
Between A and B , B wold have been OK , if the SC had given directions rather than powers. Not very sure though.

HMTG.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 271

Kudos [?]: 17 [1], given: 0

Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2005, 14:04
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
WinWinMBA wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of


would pick A

D and E use the word 'they' which is incorrect for CIA which is singular
the reason i eliminated B and C is because 'powers for' doesn't sound correct to me..but i could be wrong here as i dont know the correct idiom officially

Kudos [?]: 17 [1], given: 0

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2009
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 7

Schools: HBS 2+2
WE 1: Consulting
WE 2: Investment Management
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2010, 20:54
Just out of curiosity, how is "it" unambiguous here...couldn't it refer to the Supreme Court?
_________________

My GMAT quest...

...over!

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 7

Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1395

Kudos [?]: 937 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2010, 21:26
WinWinMBA wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.

(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of


(A) enabling it to withhold from the public -corrrect
(B) for it to withhold from the public -does not sounds correct to me
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of - awkward
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure - who are they?
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of - who are they?
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 937 [0], given: 621

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 5

Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2010, 12:53
I also want to know that why "it" is not ambiguous here.

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 5

1 KUDOS received
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1395

Kudos [?]: 937 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jul 2010, 19:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
vageesh wrote:
I also want to know that why "it" is not ambiguous here.



Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency - Supreme Court is active and CIA is passive, so SC gives CIA discretionary powers , which enable it (CIA) to withhold from the public.
"it" is not ambigous here at all ;)
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 937 [1], given: 621

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jul 2010, 10:07
Do we have an idiom like "awarded ... for " ? I am not sure.. just feel the ans is B ..

Trusting my instincts :)
Whats the OA?

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 4

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2011, 22:55
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 4

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 391 [1], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2011, 23:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
There is missing comma before "enabling". A is correct.

fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

Kudos [?]: 391 [1], given: 123

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 4

Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2011, 23:02
isn't "it" ambiguous in A and B?

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 4

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2011, 23:16
Actually there's more to it than meets the eye :)

The modifier "ing" in A modifies the previous clause and sentence was written with that intention.
In D and E- they and them are spoilers.

B and C - are unidiomatic. - for withhold/withholding

The idiom is "enable to withhold"

fanatico wrote:
isn't "it" ambiguous in A and B?

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 123

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2011, 12:16
Even i don't get why "B" is incorrect. Could anyone explain ?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2011, 23:38
gmat1220 wrote:
ing modifier wins
deepaksharma1986 wrote:
Even i don't get why "B" is incorrect. Could anyone explain ?




Could you explain a little further, as in, what is the ING rule ?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1655

Kudos [?]: 1091 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2011, 16:39
+1 A

(A) Correct.
(B) "for it" sounds redundant. Also, it seems to change the meaning of the sentence.
(C) "to the public of"? It changes the meaning.
(D) Them: wrong pronoun.
(E) They: wrong pronoun.

What do you think about my POE?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1091 [0], given: 109

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 8

Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2011, 21:15
R2I4D wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how is "it" unambiguous here...couldn't it refer to the Supreme Court?



Yes, you are correct ...
I think A is the best option here...
B and C powers for is unidiomatic.
D and E they has no referent...

Experts, Please comment.

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 8

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4273

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2011, 01:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
When there is a pronoun ambiguity in GMAT, one of the best ways of solving the muddle is to apply logic rather than mere structure.

In the given context, there are two eligible contenders for the pronoun’ it’ i.e., Supreme Court and the CIA, but the question is why will Supreme Court award the CIA something in order to enable itself? Isn’t logic missing then? That is the reason to conclude without further doubt that the pronoun refers to the CIA.

The answer is certainly A
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Location: London
Schools: INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Apr 2011, 01:35
Best option is A. But hey guys don't you think there is a "comma" missing just before "enabling".
_________________

In The World Full Of Duplicates,, I Am The Only Masterpiece..
Girl Power
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beat-the-beast-with-non-native-speaker-108349.html

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 2

Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: 186/1000 - Supreme court awarded CIA some powers [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2011, 06:50
The Answer is "A" but one must say that it has messy choices .I mean "It" in the underline portion may either refer to supreme court or to CIA!
fanatico wrote:
186. By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central Intelligence Agency broad discretionary powers enabling it to withhold from the public the identities of its sources of intelligence information.
(A) enabling it to withhold from the public
(B) for it to withhold from the public
(C) for withholding disclosure to the public of
(D) that enable them to withhold from public disclosure
(E) that they can withhold public disclosure of

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 2

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 412

Kudos [?]: 324 [2], given: 34

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Re: SC: Supreme Court [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2011, 16:00
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
deepaksharma1986 wrote:
Even i don't get why "B" is incorrect. Could anyone explain ?


Take this sentence
I love my girlfriend laughing at the chimps.
Here the bolded part is sufficient to frame the sentence. But adding a modifier [highlight]laughing at the chimps[/highlight] helps in adding information. Something similar has happened in this question:
The correct usage is “A award B X(enabling …)” where (enabling ...) is acting as modifier.

Here enabling is modifying powers, where [highlight]A award B X[/highlight] is fully complete even in absence of modifier
HTH
_________________

If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html

Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.

Kudos [?]: 324 [2], given: 34

Re: SC: Supreme Court   [#permalink] 14 May 2011, 16:00

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

By a vote of 9 to 0, the Supreme Court awarded the Central

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.