GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 03 Aug 2020, 09:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 515
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 28 Nov 2017, 21:04
12
1
161
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:36) correct 35% (01:48) wrong based on 4590 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review 2017

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 281
Page: 270

By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(B) In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(C) Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able

(D) Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able

(E) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

Originally posted by AbdurRakib on 21 Jun 2016, 14:10.
Last edited by BillyZ on 28 Nov 2017, 21:04, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2016, 15:34
46
1
20
AbdurRakib wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 281)

Dear AbdurRakib,
I'm happy to respond.

Choice (A) & (B) have a classic modifier mistake.
By devising . . . and employing . . . Henry Cavendish’s apparatus . . .
The apparatus was not doing the devising and planning. The man Henry Cavendish was the actor here, but because this actor is in the possessive, the modifier cannot target him. Both (A) and (B) make this mistake.

Choice is false parallelism: grammatically, the parallelism is perfect, but parallelism is not primarily a grammatical structure: it is primarily a logical structure. Choice (C) puts three things mechanically in parallel so that we lose any sense of the logical relation of the events, what things allowed what other things to happen. All that meaning is lost, so (C) is wrong.

Choice (D) has a glaring parallelism error: "Having devised . . . employment . . ." A perfect participle in parallel with a noun: a complete trainwreck in terms of the grammar of parallelism.

That leaves (E). Fortunately, (E) is a masterpiece: perfect parallelism (By devising . . . and employing . . . ) , and these correctly modify the man himself, Henry Cavendish. The phrasing demonstrates the logical connection of the events by the using the "by" prepositional phrases. It is grammatically correct and rhetorically successful---a sentence almost as elegant as Cavendish's measurements!

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 97
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 07:34
7
2
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

Issues: Parallelism | Modifier | Construction

Analysis:
1. The sentence talks about how Henry Cavendish was able to at a figure. Hence, the actions "devising" and "employing" should point to correct noun i.e. Henry Cavendish and not "Henry Cavendish's apparatus" because "apparatus" can not perform those actions. Also, "Henry Cavendish" should immidiately follow the modifier "By devising...,"
2. In the clause "By devising..." there are two sub-clauses for the two actions i.e. "By devising.. and employing...". The correct chioce should have those actions in parallel.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
- "Henry Cavendish’s apparatus" creates meaning issue with modifier that precedes it
- "him" does not have an antecedent.

B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him\
- "In 1797–1798" is mis-placed
- "Henry Cavendish’s apparatus" creates meaning issue with modifier that precedes it

C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
- Meaning issue with the option. (Looses the causality between the two parts of the sentence)

D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
- "Having devised... and employment..." has parallelism issue

E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

##### General Discussion
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2016, 14:37
20
7
royrijit1 wrote:
Dear Mike, I selected E using POE but my question is.....is it okay to have a split in able + to?

For e.g.:
Ver#1: After trying for several years, Sam was able to pass the GMAT in 2016

Ver#2: After trying for several years, Sam was able in 2016 to pass the GMAT.

Is is valid? "Sam was able in 2016 to pass the GMAT" ?

Dear royrijit1,
I'm happy to respond.

My friend, not only is it allowable to split the idiom able . . . to do X---in fact, splitting it is one of the GMAT's favorite tricks.

In your examples, both versions are idiomatically correct, but Version #2 sounds awkward. It sounds much more natural to communicate this particular information using version one. Splitting the idiom is perfectly fine: this just isn't a very good example. It sounds much more natural in the phrasing of (E) here. Here's another example, in GMAT-like sentence.

The structure of the fugue, which came completely naturally to J.S. Bach, utterly eluded Beethoven early in his career, but Beethoven was able, after years of determined efforts, to produce virtuoso fugues in each of his final five piano sonatas.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2016, 14:22
5
3
manhasnoname wrote:
Should " in 1797–1798" be set off by commas to make it non-essential modifier? Otherwise, it sounds awkward. Doesn't it? Could someone please clarify? Thanks!

Dear manhasnoname,

I'm happy to respond.

My friend, the entire issue of "essential" vs. "non-essential" modifiers applies only to noun modifiers. The Touch Rule also applies only to noun modifiers.

Verb modifiers are a completely different world. It doesn't make sense to talk about an "essential" or "non-essential" verb modifier, and placement of verb modifiers is considerably freer than that of noun modifiers.

The preposition "in 1797-1798" is a verb modifier. It is an adverbial phrase, playing the role of an adverb. It is fine in (E), not set off by commas. As a verb modifier, it is neither "essential" nor "non-essential." There is absolutely no problem with its placement or use in (E), the OA.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 771
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 20 Jul 2019, 05:33
3
1
Skywalker18 wrote:
1. I understand that the meaning of C is different from that of E in that option C fails to convey the relation.( By devising .. and employing )
Usage of AND conveys independent actions
Is the usage of two 'AND' in option C correct? (AND bolded below)
Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able

The use of two "and"s is not really incorrect and could be taken as a way for the author to indicate that the first two events occurred close to each other in time and the third followed later. In this case, the use of two "and"s doesn't result in a sentence that clearly expresses the point to be made. All the same, that move could be used effectively in some contexts.

Quote:
2. We can also eliminate option A based on pronoun issue?
him can't refer to possessive Henry Cavendish’s

Here's the relevant portion of choice (A).

in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

In the past, in GMAT Sentence Correction, a subject pronoun may have been considered lacking an antecedent if the only possible referent were the possessive form of a noun. However, more recent questions seem to indicate that the convention has been changed, as the correct answers to these questions have contained subject pronouns that seem to refer to referents derived from possessive forms of nouns.

So, under what seems to be the current convention, there is no pronoun issue in choice (A).
_________________

# Marty Murray | Chief Curriculum and Content Architect | Marty@TargetTestPrep.com

250 REVIEWS

5-STAR RATED ONLINE GMAT QUANT SELF STUDY COURSE

NOW WITH GMAT VERBAL (BETA)

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

Originally posted by MartyTargetTestPrep on 19 Jul 2019, 06:26.
Last edited by MartyTargetTestPrep on 20 Jul 2019, 05:33, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2015
Posts: 11
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2016, 19:46
2
mikemcgarry wrote:
AbdurRakib wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 281)

Dear AbdurRakib,
I'm happy to respond.

Choice (A) & (B) have a classic modifier mistake.
By devising . . . and employing . . . Henry Cavendish’s apparatus . . .
The apparatus was not doing the devising and planning. The man Henry Cavendish was the actor here, but because this actor is in the possessive, the modifier cannot target him. Both (A) and (B) make this mistake.

Choice is false parallelism: grammatically, the parallelism is perfect, but parallelism is not primarily a grammatical structure: it is primarily a logical structure. Choice (C) puts three things mechanically in parallel so that we lose any sense of the logical relation of the events, what things allowed what other things to happen. All that meaning is lost, so (C) is wrong.

Choice (D) has a glaring parallelism error: "Having devised . . . employment . . ." A perfect participle in parallel with a noun: a complete trainwreck in terms of the grammar of parallelism.

That leaves (E). Fortunately, (E) is a masterpiece: perfect parallelism (By devising . . . and employing . . . ) , and these correctly modify the man himself, Henry Cavendish. The phrasing demonstrates the logical connection of the events by the using the "by" prepositional phrases. It is grammatically correct and rhetorically successful---a sentence almost as elegant as Cavendish's measurements!

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Dear Mike, I selected E using POE but my question is.....is it okay to have a split in able + to?

For e.g.:
Ver#1: After trying for several years, Sam was able to pass the GMAT in 2016

Ver#2: After trying for several years, Sam was able in 2016 to pass the GMAT.

Is is valid? "Sam was able in 2016 to pass the GMAT" ?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 09:11
2
oishik2910 wrote:
AbdurRakib wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

sir I am generally confused with usage of having and consider the same as wrong but in option D if both parallelism had a structure of: having devised and having employed would it have been correct

Dear oishik2910,

I'm happy to respond.

First of all, if you want the attention of another member on GC, it's best to use the "mention this user" feature.

Also, you would make your questions much clearer and less of a challenge to interpret if you used quote marks (and preferably color) to set off your words from what you are quoting. For example,
You wrote: "sir I am generally confused with usage of having and consider the same as wrong but in option D if both parallelism had a structure of: having devised and having employed would it have been correct"
I suggest: "sir I am generally confused with usage of "having" and consider the same as wrong but in option D if both parallelism had a structure of: "having devised" and "having employed" would it have been correct."
The quote marks are necessary for clarity. The color adds additional clarity.

Here is the version you suggest:
Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and having employed uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able . . .
This is 100% grammatically correct, but it is still awful. Rhetorically, this sounds too stilted and hyper-formal--it doesn't sound natural at all. No native speaker would say this.

Remember that the GMAT SC is not simply a test of grammar. On the GMAT SC, grammar & logic & rhetoric all work together to bring forth meaning.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 4002
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2019, 21:54
2
Skywalker18 wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him- opening modifier error, him can't refer to possessive Henry Cavendish’s

2. We can also eliminate option A based on pronoun issue?
him can't refer to possessive Henry Cavendish’s

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , VeritasPrepErika , other experts - please enlighten

Skywalker18
Just to add some background to what MartyTargetTestPrep wrote about possessive antecedents.

It's not clear whether GMAC ever adhered to the rule.

It is now evident that on the GMAT, as long as meaning is clear, both object and subject pronouns may have a possessive noun as an antecedent.

After much research, I wrote a post that discusses the "possessive poison" guideline in which I cite four of at least six official questions whose correct answers violate the possessive poison guideline. That post is HERE
_________________
Visit SC Butler, here! Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date.

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

BLACK LIVES MATTER.
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Posts: 157
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2016, 19:52
1
Should " in 1797–1798" be set off by commas to make it non-essential modifier? Otherwise, it sounds awkward. Doesn't it? Could someone please clarify? Thanks!
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 13:38
1
2
Bounce1987 wrote:
mikemcgarry
What all would comprise rhetoric? Since rhetoric is important would there be certain conventions to keep in mind in order to make sure the sentence is rhetorically correct in addition to being correct in terms of grammar and logic?

Thanks

Dear Bounce1987,

I'm happy to respond.

For starters, I will recommend this blog article:
Rhetorical Construction on the GMAT Sentence Correction

A sentence is rhetorically effective if it is clear, direct, powerful, and persuasive. If a sentence is too wordy, that's a rhetorical issue. If the sentence is neither direct nor forceful, that's a rhetorical problem. For example, does the sentence make the focus the subject and does it locate the main activity in the main verb? Having the action as a verb vs. a noun is often a rhetorical issue. Is the focus-noun the subject or hidden in a prepositional phrase? Also, verbs in the passive voice are 100% grammatically correct but often present rhetorical issues. Another issue, in a list, is: what governs the order of the list? Is it logical? chronological? or just random? Random organization is not rhetorically sound. Finally, there's that very hard-to-articulate realm of rhetoric—whether something would sound "natural" or "awkward" to a native speaker. This is particularly tricky: on the harder SC, the GMAT loves to create incorrect answer choices that are 100% grammatically correct but some combination that no native speaker ever would say.

The best way to improve one's understanding of rhetoric is to make a habit of doing challenging reading every day.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2015
Posts: 247
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.59
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2017, 04:51
mikemcgarry wrote:
AbdurRakib wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 281)

Dear AbdurRakib,
I'm happy to respond.

Choice (A) & (B) have a classic modifier mistake.
By devising . . . and employing . . . Henry Cavendish’s apparatus . . .
The apparatus was not doing the devising and planning. The man Henry Cavendish was the actor here, but because this actor is in the possessive, the modifier cannot target him. Both (A) and (B) make this mistake.

Choice is false parallelism: grammatically, the parallelism is perfect, but parallelism is not primarily a grammatical structure: it is primarily a logical structure. Choice (C) puts three things mechanically in parallel so that we lose any sense of the logical relation of the events, what things allowed what other things to happen. All that meaning is lost, so (C) is wrong.

Choice (D) has a glaring parallelism error: "Having devised . . . employment . . ." A perfect participle in parallel with a noun: a complete trainwreck in terms of the grammar of parallelism.

That leaves (E). Fortunately, (E) is a masterpiece: perfect parallelism (By devising . . . and employing . . . ) , and these correctly modify the man himself, Henry Cavendish. The phrasing demonstrates the logical connection of the events by the using the "by" prepositional phrases. It is grammatically correct and rhetorically successful---a sentence almost as elegant as Cavendish's measurements!

Does all this make sense?
Mike

sir I am generally confused with usage of having and consider the same as wrong but in option D if both parallelism had a structure of: having devised and having employed would it have been correct
Intern
Joined: 19 Mar 2015
Posts: 38
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 07:57
mikemcgarry wrote:
AbdurRakib wrote:
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

A. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
B. In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him
C. Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able
D. Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able
E. By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

OG Verbal 2017 New Question(Book Question: 281)

Dear AbdurRakib,
I'm happy to respond.

Choice (A) & (B) have a classic modifier mistake.
By devising . . . and employing . . . Henry Cavendish’s apparatus . . .
The apparatus was not doing the devising and planning. The man Henry Cavendish was the actor here, but because this actor is in the possessive, the modifier cannot target him. Both (A) and (B) make this mistake.

Choice is false parallelism: grammatically, the parallelism is perfect, but parallelism is not primarily a grammatical structure: it is primarily a logical structure. Choice (C) puts three things mechanically in parallel so that we lose any sense of the logical relation of the events, what things allowed what other things to happen. All that meaning is lost, so (C) is wrong.

Choice (D) has a glaring parallelism error: "Having devised . . . employment . . ." A perfect participle in parallel with a noun: a complete trainwreck in terms of the grammar of parallelism.

That leaves (E). Fortunately, (E) is a masterpiece: perfect parallelism (By devising . . . and employing . . . ) , and these correctly modify the man himself, Henry Cavendish. The phrasing demonstrates the logical connection of the events by the using the "by" prepositional phrases. It is grammatically correct and rhetorically successful---a sentence almost as elegant as Cavendish's measurements!

Does all this make sense?
Mike

===================================

Very well Explain Buddy.. But I have a doubt and because of this, I have directly eliminated option E.
" Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798 " is this the correct wording??? "Was able in this to this " It seems its not concise and that's why i Chose C.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 09:19
kawaljeet wrote:
Very well Explain Buddy.. But I have a doubt and because of this, I have directly eliminated option E.
" Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798 " is this the correct wording??? "Was able in this to this " It seems its not concise and that's why i Chose C.

Dear kawaljeet,

I'm happy to respond.

The short answer is: yes, that's perfectly fine. The prepositional phrase "in 1797-1798" is a verb modifier, an adverbial modifier. Unlike noun modifiers, adverbial modifiers are much freer in the rules about their placement. It's perfectly fine to put this modifier between "able" and "to arrive." In fact, this is a sophisticated structure that is slightly rarer, and these facts can make it particularly challenging for non-native speakers to accept.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2017, 09:26
mikemcgarry
What all would comprise rhetoric? Since rhetoric is important would there be certain conventions to keep in mind in order to make sure the sentence is rhetorically correct in addition to being correct in terms of grammar and logic?

Thanks
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 22
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2018, 02:57
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him - wrong subject after comma

(B) In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him - same error as A

(C) Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able - not parallel

(D) Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able - not parallel

(E) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798 - correct
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2018
Posts: 167
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.87
WE: Engineering (Other)
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2018, 06:48
(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(B) In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(C) Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able

(D) Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able

(E) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1385
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 6: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 7: 710 Q47 V41
GPA: 3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2018, 19:47
This problem is simplified dramatically if we are able to logically see what the modifier is modifying - Henry or Henry's apparatus? It is of course the former.

Modifier Error
Who performed the action of "devising an instrument"? Henry of course.

Eliminate A and B - states that Henry's apparatus performed the action

Change in meaning Error - C
The intended meaning of the sentence is that HC's apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure, but (C) changes this meaning such that the cause-effect relationship between what enabled Henry to obtain these accurate measurements is eliminated.

Eliminate C

Parallelism Error - D
"having devised...employment of" are not parallel

E corrects the modifier error in the original sentence while maintaining parallel grammar. Correct
_________________
Here's how I went from 430 to 710, and how you can do it yourself:
Intern
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 9
Location: United States (DC)
GPA: 3.42
Re: By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2019, 04:25
(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(B) In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him

(C) Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able

(D) Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able

(E) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798

Splits:
1. incorrect modifier - "By devising an instrument..." cannot modify Henry Cavendish's apparatus
2. incomplete clause - b/c of meaning devised and employed should be parallel but was able should be the result of that, so C needs to have a subject "and in 1797 HE was able..."
3. parallelism of verbs - devised and employed must be parallel (not devised and employment)

E is right.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2445
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2019, 00:11
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him to arrive at an astonishingly accurate figure for the weight of the earth.

(A) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, in 1797–1798 Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him- opening modifier error, him can't refer to possessive Henry Cavendish’s
(B) In 1797–1798, by devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish’s apparatus enabled him- - opening modifier error, placement issue of 'In 1797-1798'
(C) Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able- meaning issue

(D) Having devised an instrument from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employment of uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish in 1797–1798 was able- parallelism issue - having and employment

(E) By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employing uncommonly precise measurements, Henry Cavendish was able in 1797–1798- Correct

1. I understand that the meaning of C is different from that of E in that option C fails to convey the relation.( By devising .. and employing )
Usage of AND conveys independent actions
Is the usage of two 'AND' in option C correct? (AND bolded below)
Henry Cavendish devised an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and employed uncommonly precise measurements, and in 1797–1798 was able

2. We can also eliminate option A based on pronoun issue?
him can't refer to possessive Henry Cavendish’s

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyTargetTestPrep , DmitryFarber , VeritasKarishma , generis , jennpt , VeritasPrepErika , other experts - please enlighten
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and   [#permalink] 19 Jul 2019, 00:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

# By devising an instrument made from a rod, wire, and lead balls, and

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne