GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 11 Dec 2019, 22:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
VP
VP
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1174
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2019, 12:40
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

81% (01:48) correct 19% (02:08) wrong based on 57 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails to appear on time for any one of the quarterly board meetings, or who misses two of our monthly general meetings, must be suspended. Thibodeaux, an officer, was recently suspended. But Thibodeaux has never missed a monthly general meeting. Therefore, Thibodeaux must have failed to appear on time for a quarterly board meeting.

The reasoning in Byrne’s argument is flawed in that the argument

(A) fails to consider the possibility that Thibodeaux has arrived late for two or more monthly general meetings
(B) presumes, without providing justification, that if certain events each produce a particular result, then no other event is sufficient to produce that result
(C) takes for granted that an assumption required to establish the argument’s conclusion is sufficient to establish that conclusion
(D) fails to specify at what point someone arriving at a club meeting is officially deemed late
(E) does not specify how long Thibodeaux has been an officer

_________________
Non progredi est regredi
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 220
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2019, 02:36
Akela wrote:
Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails to appear on time for any one of the quarterly board meetings, or who misses two of our monthly general meetings, must be suspended. Thibodeaux, an officer, was recently suspended. But Thibodeaux has never missed a monthly general meeting. Therefore, Thibodeaux must have failed to appear on time for a quarterly board meeting.

The reasoning in Byrne’s argument is flawed in that the argument

(A) fails to consider the possibility that Thibodeaux has arrived late for two or more monthly general meetings
If it was written "quarterly board meetings" this would be the correct answer

(B) presumes, without providing justification, that if certain events each produce a particular result, then no other event is sufficient to produce that result
In line with first flaw

(C) takes for granted that an assumption required to establish the argument’s conclusion is sufficient to establish that conclusion
non sensical. of course an assumption required to establish the argument is sufficient. The problem here is that such assumption could not be valid for other cases

(D) fails to specify at what point someone arriving at a club meeting is officially deemed late
irrelevant

(E) does not specify how long Thibodeaux has been an officer
irrelevant



What if the officer was suspended for another reason?

An assumption is that there are no other reasons to be suspended than failing to attend the monthly meeting or arriving late for the quarterly board meetings.

The first flaw in the reasoning is that there could be another reason for the suspension of the officer.
The second flaw is that the conclusion is limited to one quarterly board meeting. Let's assume that the officer was late to 2 or more of such meetings; then the officer would have been suspended anyhow.

Option B
GMAT Club Bot
Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails   [#permalink] 27 Nov 2019, 02:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Byrne: One of our club’s bylaws specifies that any officer who fails

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne