It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 01:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2145

Kudos [?]: 1662 [2], given: 8

Location: New York, NY

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2013, 17:45
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (01:18) correct 38% (01:46) wrong based on 537 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Canadian mining company Bre-X had soil samples from its Busang project examined for gold content in 1992. The positive news of gold being present attracted a range of investors - from unsophisticated individuals to saavy mining professionals - to invest in the Busang project. After years of successful promotion, the truth about this worthless property slowly emerged early in 1997 and drove Bre-X stock prices nearly to zero. A repeat analysis of the soil in 1997 indicated very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content in 1992 must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The gold content of the soil in Busang was much lower in 1997 than it was in 1992.

(B) After 1992, Bre-X was not mining in the same areas of Busang that the sample was taken from.

(C) The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples in 1992 were different from those generally used during that time.

(D) Bre-X did not have soil samples from any other Busang property examined for gold content.

(E) Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Bre-X before the samples were examined.

Original Source: Practice Pill Platform
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 1662 [2], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 22 [6], given: 142

Location: India
GPA: 3.96
WE: Research (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2013, 18:15
6
KUDOS
GMATPill wrote:
Canadian mining company Bre-X had soil samples from its Busang project examined for gold content in 1992. The positive news of gold being present attracted a range of investors - from unsophisticated individuals to saavy mining professionals - to invest in the Busang project. After years of successful promotion, the truth about this worthless property slowly emerged early in 1997 and drove Bre-X stock prices nearly to zero. A repeat analysis of the soil in 1997 indicated very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content in 1992 must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The gold content of the soil in Busang was much lower in 1997 than it was in 1992.

(B) After 1992, Bre-X was not mining in the same areas of Busang that the sample was taken from.

(C) The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples in 1992 were different from those generally used during that time.

(D) Bre-X did not have soil samples from any other Busang property examined for gold content.

(E) Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Bre-X before the samples were examined.

Conclusion: Thus the methods used to determine the gold content in 1992 must have been inaccurate.

Premise: Conflicting predictions of gold content in 1992 and 1997

Pre-thinking: The author is strongly blaming the Method to be inaccurate. So anything in the answer choices which helps us support that the METHOD is the only one which is INACCURATE and not anything else affecting the protocol would be the correct answer

POE

A- if the gold content was lower in 1997 than in 1992-it supports the fact the method was accurate in estimating gold in 1992
B- If they were no mining in the same area, it does not affect the conclusion of methods being inaccurate
C- If the methods were different, again the methods could have different sensitivity ranges to estimate gold content and still being accurate in its own ways
D- Even if there were soil samples not analyzed from different Busang properties, it cannot verify the accuracies of any method
E- Now, if the Gold was not added to the soil samples before estimation in 1992, it gives support to the fact that it was the method and nothing in the protocol which led to inaccurate results.

negating E- gold was ADDED to the soil sample destroys the conclusion that it was the addition of gold prior to the analysis which led to inaccurate results and not the method per say!

hence E

Waiting official explanation from Gmat-pill

thanks

Kudos [?]: 22 [6], given: 142

Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2013
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 01:12
Difficult question for me, GMAT-pill waiting for official explanation.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 31

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GPA: 3.6

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 06:46
1
KUDOS
doesnt look like a good question. GmatPill please give us the explanation.

Kudos [?]: 12 [1], given: 31

Intern
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 55 [1], given: 84

Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.28
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 07:40
1
KUDOS
Premises:
1992, Project X = soil samples were examined for gold content --> good result.
1997, other soil samples were examined again, proving that inadequate gold content.

Conclusion: methods employed to determine gold content in 1992 is inaccurate

Prethinking: Assumption is that the soil samples must be representative of the population
OR the gold content is equally distributed in the mine.

Hence, the company did not distort the soil samples by adding gold into.

-->E

Kudos [?]: 55 [1], given: 84

Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 158

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 29

WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 18:32
Agree why E is correct ans. However, even B seems correct.

Mining could have led to decrease in gold content. How can B be ruled out?

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 29

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.86

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2013, 19:53
Answer (B) provides another explanation to the finding which seriously weakens the argument. The correct answer choice for this question has to be the "defender" assumption by stating that the ONLY explanation to this is the method used was inaccurate.
_________________

Don't be afraid to fail, but be afraid not to try

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

Intern
Status: Pursuit of happyness
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 554

Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-24-2013
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 04:22
Blasted by the question and stunned to silence by options and OA

Regards
Siva

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 554

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 346

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 101

Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29

### Show Tags

23 Apr 2016, 09:43
The answer has to be option E. Looks straight forward
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 101

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 28

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.32
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 03:43
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
naaangerleyanyetei wrote:
Difficult question for me, GMAT-pill waiting for official explanation.

Conclusion: methods employed to determine gold content in 1992 is inaccurate

Assumption is that the soil samples must be representative of the population
OR the gold content is equally distributed in the mine.

Hence, the company did not distort the soil samples by adding gold into. E

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 28

Display posts from previous: Sort by