It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 07:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2004, 04:12
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.
(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite

why D is better than E?

explanations please..

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2004, 04:25
(D) is better.

(E) says that it is mandatory that meteriot "should" struck a human being,

While the intended meaning is to forecast the fact that meteriot "will" struck a human being.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2004, 04:55
(D) is better.

(E) says that it is mandatory that meteriot "should" struck a human being,

While the intended meaning is to forecast the fact that meteriot "will" struck a human being.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2004, 05:18
should = futurity but from a point of view in the past
Ex: I should have done it two years ago
will = futurity from present
Ex: I will do it tomorrow
Since question is talking about futurity(probability) in the present, "will" is best. Between C and D, D is best because C implies that there will be one and that one human being will be struck every nine year. D has indefinite article which means just any one human being will be struck.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jul 2004, 22:31
Thanks Paul.

I got the difference between will and should

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 06 Jul 2004, 22:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.