It is currently 25 Feb 2018, 15:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Posts: 88
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.39
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2017, 07:48
Should be struck -> morally obligated to be struck. An awkward meaning and thus we can eliminate options A, B, and E.

(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years. "a human being" is a better expression. Moreover, the sentence implies that all the meteorites in the sky will find a person to strike. That's surely not the intended meaning .
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite

Thus option D.
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Posts: 172
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Copenhagen, ESMT"19
GPA: 3.75
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2017, 20:29
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite

I looked for parallelism and found D better
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4327
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2017, 12:53
1
KUDOS
Top Contributor
It is doubtful whether 'will' always means a certainty. For example, take this case:
Seeing the binge with which Yellen is eager to go, analysts think that FED will raise the rate yet again as early as March this year.

Here, 'will' signifies more speculation or at the most some anticipation or expectation. 'Will' is often used for the futurity of the event rather than for the surety of the event.

The next point. 'Should' is often a kind of suggestion and in some cases even dreaming. For example. I think he should re-take GMAT again ASAP. Here this is a mere suggestion.
In another case, --- I feel that the erring politician should meet his waterloo this time for hobnobbing with anti-socials. -- here this is a wishful thinking.
Therefore, 'should' may not always point to compulsion as in the case of 'ought to' or 'must'

Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
let's drop A and C for using the unseemly One human being suggesting somewhat oddly that one same human being is struck by a meteorite every nine years once. Let's us eliminate B and E for the wrongful suggestion by using the inapt 'should. D remains
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Manager
Status: Single
Affiliations: None
Joined: 09 Dec 2016
Posts: 98
GPA: 3.9
WE: Asset Management (Advertising and PR)
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2017, 13:54
1
KUDOS
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2016
Posts: 15
Schools: DeGroote
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2017, 14:25
E

'Every nine years' modifier is correctly placed next to what is being calculated. Im confused whether its should or will...i think it is 'should' because according to the calculations there could be a slight chance of it not happening. 'Will' indicates with 100% that it occur. Furthermore looking at the second part of the sentence it states '16 buildings can be 'expected' to'... Not 100% sure it 'will' happen.
Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2015
Posts: 119
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2017, 10:14
Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year 16 buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite correct
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite

In A and C, it seems we are talking about a particular human being.
Wrong meaning in B.
VP
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1377
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2017, 22:06
the use of "will" is basic and easy but we need to review grammar books to understand this use properly.

"will " can be used to show a future action
I will learn gmat tomorow.

"will" can work as model verb (verb must used with another verb, like can, may, must) to show possibility, intention, habit and decision
I think that a person will be struck by a meterorite.
"should" can be used only as advise/obligation.

you do not need to read grammar book now. that is all for will and should.

gmat test basic and hard grammar point. grammar points is never hard because it is just rules. but we need to understand the rules properly.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 879
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2017, 02:30
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Posts: 32
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2017, 03:52
A. one human being should be struck - strange meaning....it seems the person should be struck..mandate..
B. one human being should be struck - strange meaning....it seems the person should be struck..mandate..
C. the second clause starts with while each year.....the first one should have time frame as the first phrase....
D. seems ok....every nine years.....while each year......parallel.
E. should be struck gives a different meaning.....
Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 151
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2017, 15:42
E

'Every nine years' modifier is correctly placed next to what is being calculated. Im confused whether its should or will...i think it is 'should' because according to the calculations there could be a slight chance of it not happening. 'Will' indicates with 100% that it occur. Furthermore looking at the second part of the sentence it states '16 buildings can be 'expected' to'... Not 100% sure it 'will' happen.

I have also had a dillema between D and E have chosen E.
Because "will be struck" sounds to strong.

But the right answer is D. I suppose it is because "should" in E can be interpretated as reccomendation to be struck.
I am not sure, but do not see any oher explanation.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 98
Location: Australia
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2017, 19:39
Hi RonPurewal

Could I please request a clarification?

- Can "should" be used to convey probability?
- Can "will" be used to convey probability? Or, in this context "will" is used to convey certainty?

What does, in fact, separate D from E?

Best
RzS
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 259
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2017, 01:04
noboru wrote:
198. Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite, while each year sixteen buildings can be expected to sustain damage from such objects.

(A) one human being should be struck every nine years by a meteorite
(B) a human being should be struck by a meteorite once in every nine years
(C) a meteorite will strike one human being once in every nine years
(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite
(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite

should is used to show advice.
will is used to show
1 . a future action. i will learn gmat tomorow
2. a certainty. he will come here now
3. a willingness. i will give you a job
4. a habit.

so, will can be a future action or can be a model verb showing: certainty, willingness and habit.

back our problem, scientist talk about a certainty. so, will is good.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2455
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2017, 01:50
TheRzS wrote:
Could I please request a clarification?

- Can "should" be used to convey probability?
- Can "will" be used to convey probability? Or, in this context "will" is used to convey certainty?

What does, in fact, separate D from E?

Best
RzS

Hello TheRzS,

Since you have a couple of doubts, I would just like to add my two cents here.

Quote:
- Can "should" be used to convey probability?

The answer is no. The word should is used to present obligation.

Quote:
- Can "will" be used to convey probability? Or, in this context "will" is used to convey certainty?

It is true that the helping verb will is generally used to present an action that is going to happen for sure. However, verb tenses are the trickiest part of the grammar. Their correct usage is completely governed by the context of the sentence.

Per the context of the sentence, it is easy to understand that the author wants to present probability. It is not that we see humans getting hit by a meteor as general occurrence. So yes, per the context of this official sentence, usage of will basically shows a calculation.

Now let's talk about the difference between Choices D and E.

(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite: Correct: As explained, will has been used to present a calculation.

(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite: Incorrect: Usage of should suggests that a person must for sure be struck by a meteorite as if it is the duty/obligation of a man to be struck by a meteorite.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2015
Posts: 98
Location: Australia
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2017, 03:03
egmat wrote:
TheRzS wrote:
Could I please request a clarification?

- Can "should" be used to convey probability?
- Can "will" be used to convey probability? Or, in this context "will" is used to convey certainty?

What does, in fact, separate D from E?

Best
RzS

Hello TheRzS,

Since you have a couple of doubts, I would just like to add my two cents here.

Quote:
- Can "should" be used to convey probability?

The answer is no. The word should is used to present obligation.

Quote:
- Can "will" be used to convey probability? Or, in this context "will" is used to convey certainty?

It is true that the helping verb will is generally used to present an action that is going to happen for sure. However, verb tenses are the trickiest part of the grammar. Their correct usage is completely governed by the context of the sentence.

Per the context of the sentence, it is easy to understand that the author wants to present probability. It is not that we see humans getting hit by a meteor as general occurrence. So yes, per the context of this official sentence, usage of will basically shows a calculation.

Now let's talk about the difference between Choices D and E.

(D) every nine years a human being will be struck by a meteorite: Correct: As explained, will has been used to present a calculation.

(E) every nine years a human being should be struck by a meteorite: Incorrect: Usage of should suggests that a person must for sure be struck by a meteorite as if it is the duty/obligation of a man to be struck by a meteorite.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Thanks Shraddha, exactly what I needed.
May I say, I am a fan of your explanations.

Best
RzS
Re: Canadian scientists have calculated that one human being should be   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2017, 03:03

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 54 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by