Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 498
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 142 [1] , given: 149

Candidate: The government spends $500 more each year [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 Jan 2011, 07:17 1 This post received KUDOS 9 This post was BOOKMARKED 00:00 Difficulty: 95% (hard) Question Stats: 32% (03:19) correct 68% (02:08) wrong based on 266 sessions ### HideShow timer Statistics Candidate: The government spends$500 more each year promoting highway safety than it spends combating cigarette smoking. But each year many more people die from smoking smoking-related diseases than die highway accidents. So the government would save lives by shifting funds from highway safety programs to antismoking programs.

The flawed reasoning in which one of the following arguments most closely parallels the flawed reasoning in the candidate's argument?

A. The government enforces the speed limit on freeways much more closely than on tollways. But many more people die each year in auto accidents on freeways than die on auto accidents on tollways. So the government would save lives by shifting funds from enforcement of speed limits on freeways to enforcement of speed limits on tollways.

B. A certain professional musician spends several times as many hours practicing guitar as she spends practicing saxophone. But she is hired much more often to play saxophone than to play guitar, so she would increase her number of playing engagements by spending less time practicing guitar and more time practicing saxophone.

C. Automobiles burn more gas per minute on highways than on residential streets. But they get fewer miles per gallon on residential streets. Therefore, gas would be saved by driving less on residential streets Therefore, gas would be saved by driving less on residential streets and more on highways.

D. The local swim team spends many more hours practicing the backstroke than it spends practicing the breaststroke. But the team's lap time for the breaststroke are much better than its times for the backstroke, so the team would win more swim meets if it spent less time practicing the backstroke and more time practicing the breaststroke.

E. Banks have higher profit margin on loans that have a higher interest rate than on loans that have a low interest rate. But borrowers are willing to borrow larger sums at low rates than at high rates. Therefore, bankds would be more profitable if they gave more loans at low rates and fewer loans at high rates.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !

If you have any questions
New!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 498
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 149

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2011, 07:22
First I tried to identify the Flaw in the reasoning and then tried to find an option which had an identical flaw
The government spends $500 more each year promoting highway safety than it spends combating cigarette smoking. But each year many more people die from smoking smoking-related diseases than die highway accidents. So the government would save lives by shifting funds from highway safety programs to antismoking programs. The argument overlooks the possiblity that less fatalities on the Highways could have been a result of the extra funds that the govt spends on the Highways But i didnt find any option which had an identical Flaw so at the end with D . Can Someone help me understand this pt. _________________ My Post Invites Discussions not answers Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now ! Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html Manager Joined: 02 Oct 2010 Posts: 158 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 29 Re: Parallel Reasoning [#permalink] ### Show Tags 13 Jan 2011, 22:24 My answer is A..I think its very clear. But the OA is given as B. Can anyone explain the reasoning behind this.?? Senior Manager Joined: 25 Feb 2010 Posts: 481 Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 10 Re: Parallel Reasoning [#permalink] ### Show Tags 17 Jan 2011, 17:45 Fact1: Govt spends$500mill more on HS than CS.
Fact2: CS claims more lives than HS
Conc: Govt would save lives [less claimed lives] by spending less on HS and more on CS.
Goal: Claim less lives - Does our conc. meet this goal with support of facts? Yes.

(B) Fact1: Musician spends more hours on G than S.
Fact2: Gets more jobs for S than G
Conc: Get more jobs by spending less hours on G and more on S
Goal: Get more jobs - Does our conc. meet this goal with support of facts? Yes.

(D) Fact1: Swim team spends more hours on backstroke than breaststroke
Fact2: Breaststroke times are better than backstroke times
Conc: Win more meets by spending less time on backstroke & more time on breaststroke.
Goal: Win more meets - Does our conc. meet this goal with support of facts? No.

(D) clearly misses the point in connecting Conc. with with Fact2.
Conc deals with winning races, Fact2 deals with better times.
There is no stated fact that better times lead to more winned races.
In Stimulus and (B) the conclusion, while flawed, is based off stated facts..
_________________

GGG (Gym / GMAT / Girl) -- Be Serious

Its your duty to post OA afterwards; some one must be waiting for that...

Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
Posts: 147
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 500 Q45 V16
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

19 Jan 2011, 05:08
Thanks for the explanation onedayill. I went with D as well.
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1672
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 520 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2011, 21:22
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2011, 22:48
I was a bit confused too. Good explanation onedayill, thanks.
_________________

Good Luck!!!

***Help and be helped!!!****

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2011, 08:23
i still dont perform well on these flawed reasoning questions , this kind of questions irritate me.@onedayill , i think your reasoning and method makes sense. thanks for explaining the method
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

25 May 2011, 07:58
between B and D I always end up picking up D.
Guess swimming is better than playing a guitar.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10622
Followers: 941

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2016, 20:19
Quite Tricky. Got the answer B but took me 4.15 mins.
Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2016
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2017, 03:28
Shreyaa21 wrote:
I am confused between B and C. Why is C incorrect?

The passage is about a choice between two options - it suggests that the choice should be made on the basis of the return that would be possible by investing in that option. But the flaw in this argument could be a wrong estimation of the return. It is possible that the anti-smoking investment would not be able influence people as effectively as a high-way safety campaign does so the reduction in number of deaths as expected would not be achieved.

Option B shows a similar flaw - the investment (time of practicing) in saxophone may not bring in the return (more engagements) one estimates. It is possible that the people who come to listen to saxophone programs is already nearly at its peak level. Further betterment of the saxophone skill may not draw more listeners as expected.

Thus B is similar to the passage.

However you would not be able to find such a flaw in option C. If you drive on highways you would definitely save more fuel. There is no flaw in this.

Another way of looking at the problem:
The passage and option B are about making a choice. But option C is not about making a choice - if a person needs to travel to a different city, he would require to take a highway and if he wants to go to the market, he has to take residential streets. There is no choice involved in option C - if someone wants to go to market, he cannot take a highway and if one wants to go to a different city, he cannot take residential streets.
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 95
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 319

Re: Candidate: The government spends $500 more each year [#permalink] ### Show Tags 12 Feb 2017, 05:36 1 This post was BOOKMARKED sayantanc2k wrote: Shreyaa21 wrote: I am confused between B and C. Why is C incorrect? The passage is about a choice between two options - it suggests that the choice should be made on the basis of the return that would be possible by investing in that option. But the flaw in this argument could be a wrong estimation of the return. It is possible that the anti-smoking investment would not be able influence people as effectively as a high-way safety campaign does so the reduction in number of deaths as expected would not be achieved. Option B shows a similar flaw - the investment (time of practicing) in saxophone may not bring in the return (more engagements) one estimates. It is possible that the people who come to listen to saxophone programs is already nearly at its peak level. Further betterment of the saxophone skill may not draw more listeners as expected. Thus B is similar to the passage. However you would not be able to find such a flaw in option C. If you drive on highways you would definitely save more fuel. There is no flaw in this. Another way of looking at the problem: The passage and option B are about making a choice. But option C is not about making a choice - if a person needs to travel to a different city, he would require to take a highway and if he wants to go to the market, he has to take residential streets. There is no choice involved in option C - if someone wants to go to market, he cannot take a highway and if one wants to go to a different city, he cannot take residential streets. Also, abstraction is the key here, problem D has the same abstraction as the passage, but there is no flaw in the choice D, Re: Candidate: The government spends$500 more each year   [#permalink] 12 Feb 2017, 05:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Curbing government spending has been demonstrated to raise t 5 25 Aug 2014, 00:19
10 The staff of Soundview School is spending more and more 18 06 Nov 2013, 12:21
1 Candidate: The government spends $500 more each year 9 15 Jan 2010, 00:01 16 Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug 19 12 Jul 2008, 10:02 Candidate: The government spends$500 million more each year 5 01 Mar 2007, 02:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by