GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Jun 2018, 17:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 104
Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2010, 03:10
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

59% (01:34) correct 41% (01:08) wrong based on 75 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

. Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black belt in either karate or judo, and a high school diploma and no criminal record. Peter, who possesses black belts in both karate and judo, applied for a job at the Constabulary, but was not hired. This meant that he either failed to earn a high school diploma or has some form of criminal record.
The sections in boldface above play what role in the sentence?
A. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is logically valid.
B. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.
C. The first part is a premise necessary to draw the conclusion, and the second part is a premise unrelated to the first premise.
D. The first part is a question, the second part is an answer to the question posed in the first part.
E. The first part is a question, the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.


I have marked
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1297
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2010, 10:49
Please highlight the statements which are boldfaced.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: ISB, Hyderabad
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 156
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2010, 20:17
Come on boldface it :)
_________________

-AD

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 201
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2010, 21:50
Please Highlight it otherwise it is of no use.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 209
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2011, 23:20
According to the OA boldfaced parts must be "Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black belt in either karate or judo, and a high school diploma and no criminal record." and "This meant that he either failed to earn a high school diploma or has some form of criminal record."
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 514
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2011, 10:10
Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black belt in either karate or judo, and a high school diploma and no criminal record. Peter, who possesses black belts in both karate and judo, applied for a job at the Constabulary, but was not hired. This meant that he either failed to earn a high school diploma or has some form of criminal record.
The sections in boldface above play what role in the sentence?
A. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is logically valid.
B. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.
C. The first part is a premise necessary to draw the conclusion, and the second part is a premise unrelated to the first premise.
D. The first part is a question, the second part is an answer to the question posed in the first part.
E. The first part is a question, the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 393
Reviews Badge
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2011, 13:26
I too think it should be B. A could be correct but we don't know if this conclusion has been logically drawn. Hence,my choice is B.

C,D and E are definitely ruled out.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 29
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2011, 08:15
B because there maybe a 3rd reason due to which he was rejected...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 155
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2011, 08:27
A it is ... Out of the three conditions, Peter satisfies one condition. So, he must not have got some criminal record or no degree..
_________________

Two great challenges: 1. Guts to Fail and 2. Fear to Succeed

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 116
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2011, 11:44
I would pick A too..The wording "This meant" seals the deal that it is a conclusion which can be drawn from the previous stated sentences..
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 575
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2011, 19:37
+1 for B.

The argument just states the requirements.

If Constabulary hired somebody --> a black belt in either karate or judo AND a high school diploma AND no criminal record.

This does not necessarily mean if a person fulfills alll the requirements he will be hired. It is possible that there were more eligible candidates than positions (meaning some people who fulfill the requirements would be left out).

The logical validity can also be tested by using formal logic.

Sufficient --> Necessary
Constabulary hired somebody --> He fulfilled requirements. -- Given
~Constabulary hired somebody --> ~He fulfilled requirements. --Conclusion ==> Incorrect, this is false negation (the correct logic is ~ Necessary -> ~Sufficient)
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 125
GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 22:11
gmatpapa wrote:
Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black belt in either karate or judo, and a high school diploma and no criminal record. Peter, who possesses black belts in both karate and judo, applied for a job at the Constabulary, but was not hired. This meant that he either failed to earn a high school diploma or has some form of criminal record.
The sections in boldface above play what role in the sentence?
A. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is logically valid.
B. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.
C. The first part is a premise necessary to draw the conclusion, and the second part is a premise unrelated to the first premise.
D. The first part is a question, the second part is an answer to the question posed in the first part.
E. The first part is a question, the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.


Answer: A

The organisational body (Central armed constabulary) hires only...i.e. conditional.

What are these conditions?
1. possess black belt in Judo or karate
2. high school diploma
3. no criminal record

Peter fulfilled condition [1], yet was not hired. --> highly likely that he failed to fulfill condition [2] or [3].
_________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 107
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 22:39
answer will be a...
A. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is logically valid.
--> the first part is the premise(fact) for the conclusion to be true. the second part is valid conclusion because if he is not hired even though he has black belt in judo and karate. that means there is possibility that the other two essential criteria have not been fulfilled.

B. The first part is background information relevant to the conclusion, and the second part is a conclusion that is not necessarily valid.

this is incorrect because the conclusion is a valid one.....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 355
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 22:48
Picked B. but still confused between A and B.

"Logically Valid" - in option A makes it a strong choice.

Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 155
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Re: CR5 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2011, 22:12
I will also go for A. Whats the OA?
_________________

If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)

My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Obsessed with failure!
Joined: 29 May 2011
Posts: 26
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 540 Q41 V23
GMAT 3: 610 Q39 V35
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2012, 23:38
Hey,

My choice 'B'

can someone coherently plz explain why choice 'A' is the OA over 'B'.

my understanding is that, as per the conclusion stated Peter did not make the cut because he might have not possessed the diploma or has some form of criminal record. If the conclusion has to logically follow then he could have failed in one of the above criteria. But, if peter has failed to meet both the criteria i.e he doesn't have the diploma and also has the criminal record then still he will not make the cut. In which case the conclusion doesn't logically follow.
_________________

Character is what you have left when you've lost everything you can lose!

Obliterated into oblivion 630 -> 540 -> A Big SOS!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 91
Re: Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2012, 09:31
Vote for B
If those guys hire only those kinda people it doesn't mean ALL those kinda people. I think they only accept guys with that requirenvents
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2017, 19:36
This is my take on the question. Please let me know i my method is correct. B1- talks about the necessities to apply for the post
B2 - Talks about the reason why peter was not selected. Options B /C / E all say that the second part is invalidated or not necessarily valid . hence all these options are incorrect. Now between A and D , D says that the first part is a question but it is just suggesting the background information. So answer is A
Re: Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black   [#permalink] 23 Nov 2017, 19:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Central armed constabulary hires only those who have a black

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.