Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 11:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Certain minor peculiarities of language are used

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Certain minor peculiarities of language are used [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2008, 08:48
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Certain minor peculiarities of language are used unconsciously by poets. If such peculiarities appear in the works of more than one poet, they are likely to reflect the language in common use during the poets’ time. However, if they appear in the work of only one poet, they are likely to be personal idiosyncrasies. As such, they can provide a kind of “fingerprint” that allows scholars, by comparing a poem of previously unknown authorship to the work of a particular known poet, to identify the poem as the work of that poet.

For which one of the following reasons can the test described above never provide conclusive proof of the authorship of any poem?

(A) The labor of analyzing peculiarities of language both in the work of a known poet and in a poem of unknown authorship would not be undertaken unless other evidence already suggested that the poem of unknown authorship was written by the known poet.
(B) A peculiarity of language that might be used as an identifying mark is likely to be widely scattered in the work of a poet, so that a single poem not known to have been written by that poet might not include that peculiarity.
(C) A peculiarity of language in a poem of unknown authorship could be evidence either that the poem was written by the one author known to use that peculiarity or that the peculiarity was not unique to that author.
(D) Minor peculiarities of language contribute far less to the literary effect of any poem than such factors as poetic form, subject matter, and deliberately chosen wording.
(E) A poet’s use of some peculiarities of language might have been unconscious in some poems and conscious in other poems, and the two uses would be indistinguishable to scholars at a later date.

Pls explain??
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 267
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2008, 12:37
neelabhmahesh wrote:
Certain minor peculiarities of language are used unconsciously by poets. If such peculiarities appear in the works of more than one poet, they are likely to reflect the language in common use during the poets’ time. However, if they appear in the work of only one poet, they are likely to be personal idiosyncrasies. As such, they can provide a kind of “fingerprint” that allows scholars, by comparing a poem of previously unknown authorship to the work of a particular known poet, to identify the poem as the work of that poet.

For which one of the following reasons can the test described above never provide conclusive proof of the authorship of any poem?

(A) The labor of analyzing peculiarities of language both in the work of a known poet and in a poem of unknown authorship would not be undertaken unless other evidence already suggested that the poem of unknown authorship was written by the known poet.Irrelevant. Don't need any other evidence.
(B) A peculiarity of language that might be used as an identifying mark is likely to be widely scattered in the work of a poet, so that a single poem not known to have been written by that poet might not include that peculiarity.Incorrect. Doesn't address why we can't fingerprint an author once the fingerprint is detected in his poem.
(C) A peculiarity of language in a poem of unknown authorship could be evidence either that the poem was written by the one author known to use that peculiarity or that the peculiarity was not unique to that author. Correct. If a peculiarty cannot be uniquely traced to the author, we have a problem.
(D) Minor peculiarities of language contribute far less to the literary effect of any poem than such factors as poetic form, subject matter, and deliberately chosen wording. Irrelevant. Additional information.
(E) A poet’s use of some peculiarities of language might have been unconscious in some poems and conscious in other poems, and the two uses would be indistinguishable to scholars at a later date. Irrelevant. We're not trying to distinguish between the two modes (conscious use vs otherwise) in the poet's poems.

Pls explain??

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 267
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 16

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2008, 12:37
incognito1 wrote:
neelabhmahesh wrote:
Certain minor peculiarities of language are used unconsciously by poets. If such peculiarities appear in the works of more than one poet, they are likely to reflect the language in common use during the poets’ time. However, if they appear in the work of only one poet, they are likely to be personal idiosyncrasies. As such, they can provide a kind of “fingerprint” that allows scholars, by comparing a poem of previously unknown authorship to the work of a particular known poet, to identify the poem as the work of that poet.

For which one of the following reasons can the test described above never provide conclusive proof of the authorship of any poem?

(A) The labor of analyzing peculiarities of language both in the work of a known poet and in a poem of unknown authorship would not be undertaken unless other evidence already suggested that the poem of unknown authorship was written by the known poet.Irrelevant. Don't need any other evidence.
(B) A peculiarity of language that might be used as an identifying mark is likely to be widely scattered in the work of a poet, so that a single poem not known to have been written by that poet might not include that peculiarity.Incorrect. Doesn't address why we can't fingerprint an author once the fingerprint is detected in his poem.
(C) A peculiarity of language in a poem of unknown authorship could be evidence either that the poem was written by the one author known to use that peculiarity or that the peculiarity was not unique to that author. Correct. If a peculiarty cannot be uniquely traced to the author, we have a problem.
(D) Minor peculiarities of language contribute far less to the literary effect of any poem than such factors as poetic form, subject matter, and deliberately chosen wording. Irrelevant. Additional information.
(E) A poet’s use of some peculiarities of language might have been unconscious in some poems and conscious in other poems, and the two uses would be indistinguishable to scholars at a later date. Irrelevant. We're not trying to distinguish between the two modes (conscious use vs otherwise) in the poet's poems.

Pls explain??

_________________
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 792
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2008, 14:24
Given: Comparing a poem of previously unknown authority to the work of a particular known poet, we can conclude the poem as the work of that poet.
The information that less useful in identifying the poet is either unknown poet’s writings reflect is not consistent or known poet’s writing has no inconsistencies.

(A) The labor of analyzing peculiarities of language both in the work of a known poet and in a poem of unknown authorship would not be undertaken unless other evidence already suggested that the poem of unknown authorship was written by the known poet. [Criteria for analyzing peculiarities is out of scope – eliminate it]

(B) A peculiarity of language that might be used as an identifying mark is likely to be widely scattered in the work of a poet, so that a single poem not known to have been written by that poet might not include that peculiarity. [But requirement is to compare with the works of unknown authority – eliminate it]

(C) A peculiarity of language in a poem of unknown authorship could be evidence either that the poem was written by the one author known to use that peculiarity or that the peculiarity was not unique to that author. [Good one – with this answer choice even if we want to find out the peculiarities of known author is impossible – hold it]

(D) Minor peculiarities of language contribute far less to the literary effect of any poem than such factors as poetic form, subject matter, and deliberately chosen wording. [What contributes to the literacy – out of scope – eliminate it]

(E) A poet’s use of some peculiarities of language might have been unconscious in some poems and conscious in other poems, and the two uses would be indistinguishable to scholars at a later date. [This is good one, but we require to compare with the unknown authority – eliminate it]

Re: CR:Pecualirities of language   [#permalink] 24 Feb 2008, 14:24
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 English and the Austronesian language Mbarbaram both use the word “dog 0 22 Feb 2017, 18:58
6 The management at a certain company opposes the use of 11 16 Jul 2011, 08:39
A certain retailer promotes merchandise by using the 3 23 Sep 2008, 10:08
A certain retailer promotes merchandise by using the 6 25 Nov 2007, 00:06
Certain instruments used in veterinary surgery can be made 4 19 May 2007, 07:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by