It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 22:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Charlotte Parkins

Author Message
Director
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 596

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2005, 03:33
christoph wrote:
saurya_s wrote:
I am just not able to het this one? Why B and C are wrong?

B) is wrong because "clustered suburban houses" cannot include something...

C) is wrong for the same reason as above

Christoph, does clustered suburban houses mean suburban houses that are clustered? I am not still able to get the point, can u plz elaborate on this.
s
_________________

Regards, S

Kudos [?]: 266 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 May 2005, 16:59
ob gave a good explanation here. Only D has the right form. X calls for Y and Z, each one being nouns. For instance, you will not "call for X to..." but you will "call for X" period.

Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities

In bold are the two nouns required for the idiom to stand. The rest in red are just modifiers to the respective nouns. The first is a restrictive clause and the second is a prepositional phrase. A is also good by enumerating two nouns but has present participle which is not preferred because it is a continuous tense implying an ongoing action.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 522 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 May 2005, 11:25
I feel that A is wrong for a this reason: "Someone called for X including Y" implies that Y is a part or subset of X, which is not the case here and hence incorrect.

What do you guys say??
_________________

krish

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

05 May 2005, 11:25

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by