Rahul885
https://gmatclub.com/forum/at-a-blind-t ... ml#p651981
Can someone help me identify what am I missing and whats wrong with this approach.
In your first case (1112), you chose a tea which would have 3 cups chosen (3C1). Then, you also had to choose a tea that would have 1 cup chosen (2C1). This is correct. This term (3c1 x 3c3 x 2c1 x 3c1 = 18) is correct imo.
Your second case (1122) is where I think the error is. In reality, both the teas chosen have 2 cups chosen each. In other words, you should actually do 3C2 (in how many ways can I choose 2 teas out of 3 for the purposes of taking 2 cups each from the tea). So, actually 3c2 (2 choose the 2 teas) x 3c2 (for cups - 1 of the 2 teas chosen) x 3c2 (for cups - the other tea chosen) = 27. This gives a total of 45. 45/9c4 = 5/14.
In essence, i believe that a double count is happening in your 2nd case (1122) because of the 2C1.
I found it easier to use the complement method here. 1 - (no of ways of ensuring at least 1 tea is tasted).
Edit: I meant 1 - P(all 3 teas are tasted at least once)

vishallchoudhary
How did you decide to use the (A+B+C+D+E+F+G=350) formula instead of (A+B+C-2G-(D+E+F)=350)?
Judgement call in my case. But if you think about it, the first question asks us to find max value of "B alone". This does suggest that even if I work with (A+B+C - (II ) - 2(III)), I would eventually need to arrive at B alone. Hence, why not use - a+b+c+d+e+f+g+n(none) = total.