It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 07:51

# STARTING SOON:

Live Chat with Cornell Adcoms in Main Chat Room  |  R1 Interview Invites: MIT Sloan Chat  |  UCLA Anderson Chat  |  Duke Fuqua Chat (EA Decisions)

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Check this out!!! Lists of hospitals have been compiled

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Check this out!!! Lists of hospitals have been compiled [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 01:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Check this out!!!
Lists of hospitals have been compiled showing which hospitals have patient death rates exceeding the national average. The data have been adjusted to allow for differences in the ages of patients.
Each of the following, if true, provides a good logical ground for hospitals to object to interpreting rank on these lists as one of the indices of the quality of hospital care EXCEPT:
(A) Rank order might indicate insignificant differences, rather than large differences, in numbers of patient deaths.
(B) Hospitals that keep patients longer are likely to have higher death rates than those that discharge patients earlier but do not record deaths of patients at home after discharge.
(C) Patients who are very old on admission to a hospital are less likely than younger patients to survive the same types of illnesses or surgical procedures.
(D) Some hospitals serve a larger proportion of low-income patients, who tend to be more seriously ill when admitted to a hospital.
(E) For-profit hospitals sometimes do not provide intensive-care units and other expensive services for very sick patients but refer or transfer such patients to other hospitals.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 01:56
I go with A.
If rank doesnt show large differences, then why do hospitals have to object ?

Rest everything supports hospital's objection

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 788

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

Location: BULGARIA

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 02:02
If the data have been adjusted for the age of the patients, then C can not be used as an argument

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 02:12
I go with C. C states age as a reason why patients will not survive a particular illness or surgical procedure, but this is an invalid argument as the question already tells us that data have been adjusted to allow for differences in the age of patients.

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 444

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 02:14
C it is.

A does provides a good reason for hospitals to object, since , for instance, if hospitals A, B, and C have following figures that represent deaths - 1000001, 1000002 and 1000003 respectively, it will rank hospital C 2 places bellow hospital A . And, while the customers treating this ranking will obviously assume that hospital A is much better then hospital B, needless to explain why it is not so.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 137

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 02:22
yup .. C is the OA .. but still I find A as a good contender too .. Although insignificant, still one hospital wud have an edge over other, nobody can deny that ... ywilfred has come up with a very good explanation which has cleared my doubt about C, thnx ..

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 659

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 02:26
Oh yes, I missed that part where it said data has been adjusted to allow for difference in age.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

23 May 2006, 03:57
Good Question hisharma.. I had initially chosen A.. but i think the explanation above... convinces me.. C it is
_________________

If not now WHEN !!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 May 2006, 22:10
Will go with C.

C directly contradicts what is given in the argument. Hence ti doesnot hold any logical grounds for objection to interpretationof rankings

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

24 May 2006, 22:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by