GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jun 2018, 01:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Child development specialists have observed that adolescents

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 268

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2012, 22:33
1
2
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (00:53) correct 18% (01:01) wrong based on 385 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

allowances tend to spend money on items considered frivolous by their parents whereas
adolescents who receive small weekly allowances do not. Thus, in order to ensure that their
children do not spend money on frivolous items, parents should not give their children large
weekly allowances. Which of the following pieces of information would be most useful in
evaluating the validity of the conclusion above?
b) Any differences among parents in the standard used to judge an item as frivolous
c) The educational background of the child development specialists who made this observation
d) The difference between the average annual income of families in which the parents give their
children large weekly allowances and that of families in which the parents give their children
small weekly allowances

Main CR Qs link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html

_________________

********************
Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post.

Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 201
Re: CR - Evaluate - # 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2012, 10:56
It is B since if parents use the same standard, the argument will hold true.
Manager
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 172
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: CR - Evaluate - # 3 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2012, 10:39
Conclusion :
Thus, in order to ensure that their children do not spend money on frivolous items, parents should not give their children large weekly allowances.

What would be most useful in evaluating the validity of the conclusion above is to know what is considered frivolous item. An item could be frivolous for one parent but not for another. In that case conclusion may not hold true because large amount itself may vary from \$1 to \$1000 and more.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-guide-to-the-official-guide-13-for-gmat-review-134210.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 666
Location: United States
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2017, 11:35
1
frivolous :- not having any serious purpose or value.

Adolescents--->large weekly allowances-->spend on items not having any serious purpose or value.
Adolescents--->small weekly allowances-->do not spend on items not having serious purpose or value.
The conclusion of the passage is that parents can ensure that their children will not spend money on frivolous items by limiting their children's allowances. This claim is based on the observed difference between the spending habits of children who receive large allowances and those of children who receive small allowances. The argument assumes that the high dollar amount of the allowance – as opposed to some other unobserved factor – is directly linked to the fact that children spend the money on items their parents consider frivolous. Information that provides data about any other factor that might be the cause of the children's spending behavior would help to evaluate the validity of the conclusion.

(B) CORRECT. One alternative to the conclusion of the passage is that the standard used to judge an item as frivolous was much lower for parents who gave their children large weekly allowances than for parents who gave their children small weekly allowances. If for example, the former group of parents considered all movie tickets to be frivolous, while the latter did not, then this fact (and not the difference in allowance money) might explain the difference observed by the child development specialists. Thus, information about any differences among parents in the standard used to judge an item as frivolous would be extremely relevant in evaluating the validity of the conclusion of the passage.

(C) The background of the child development specialists who made the observation has no bearing on the conclusion. The conclusion is based on the observation, not on the credentials of those making the observation.
(D) Family income differences have no clear relevance to the link posited between high allowances and spending on frivolous items.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Re: Child development specialists have observed that adolescents   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2017, 11:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by