Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Feb 2017, 17:39

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 175
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 15

Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Aug 2010, 23:28
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

19% (02:22) correct 81% (00:46) wrong based on 26 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents earned doctorates are more likely to earn a doctorate than children whose parents did not earn doctorates.

Hart: But consider this: over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a parent that also holds a doctorate.

Which of the following would explain how both Hart and Choi could be correct in their assertions?

Most doctorates who don't have a parent that also holds a doctorate have an aunt or uncle that holds a doctorate.
Parental education is rarely the overriding factor in determining whether a person earns a doctorate or not.
Both Hart and Choi fail to produce sufficient evidence to prove their cases.
One man uses raw numbers while the other uses percents.
Hart does not dispute Choi, but rather attempts to support his argument with additional evidence.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 762 [1] , given: 36

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2010, 00:31
1
KUDOS
The first rule of gmat - apples cannot be compared with oranges.

They have different points and there is no contradiction. Hart's reply is a scope shift. Hence E is ruled out.

E. Hart does not dispute Choi, but rather attempts to support his argument with additional evidence. -----> Hart does not support Choi. Also does not contradict Choi.

If they both are correct then B is left. Mechanically I can put their replies @ 90 degree so one thing has no bearing on the other.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 32 [1] , given: 33

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2010, 05:10
1
KUDOS
Its a good question.

I believe, if they were conversing, it would be like :
Hart: Hey !!!..70 % is negative..How you are correct.
Choi: Read my sentence Man : All factors being equal !!!...Now if Parental education is rarely affecting the education of Child, I am not responsible. If you make all factors equal, and make my "Parental Education" as prime One, then I am sure....the babies are Noble Winners
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2010, 08:26
B!
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 20

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Aug 2010, 20:23
nusmavrik wrote:
The first rule of gmat - apples cannot be compared with oranges.

They have different points and there is no contradiction. Hart's reply is a scope shift. Hence E is ruled out.

E. Hart does not dispute Choi, but rather attempts to support his argument with additional evidence. -----> Hart does not support Choi. Also does not contradict Choi.

If they both are correct then B is left. Mechanically I can put their replies @ 90 degree so one thing has no bearing on the other.

@nusmavrik
Surely B supports Hart's assertion. But how does that support Choi as he mentions that parental education does play a role.

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 762 [1] , given: 36

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2010, 00:15
1
KUDOS
Choi uses the word "more likely" - which is just a possibility. Can you predict the future? Not with certainty. That's the catch.

Most importantly - did you get that Hart's reply was scope shift? Hard did not contradict Choi.

rohitgoel15 wrote:
nusmavrik wrote:
The first rule of gmat - apples cannot be compared with oranges.

They have different points and there is no contradiction. Hart's reply is a scope shift. Hence E is ruled out.

E. Hart does not dispute Choi, but rather attempts to support his argument with additional evidence. -----> Hart does not support Choi. Also does not contradict Choi.

If they both are correct then B is left. Mechanically I can put their replies @ 90 degree so one thing has no bearing on the other.

@nusmavrik
Surely B supports Hart's assertion. But how does that support Choi as he mentions that parental education does play a role.

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 538 [0], given: 20

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2010, 09:05
Thanks nusmavrik. Kudos for U
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 11

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 02:53
Didn't concentrate and pick E.

Should be B by simple POE.
Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Aug 2010, 09:24
had trouble with that one. thanks for OA
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 24

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 00:16
Nice one!! Foxed me.
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Re: Kaplan CAT: What Explains both the speakers's assertions   [#permalink] 07 Sep 2010, 00:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
35 Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents 11 13 Jun 2013, 03:48
1 Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents 16 21 Jul 2011, 17:03
6 Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents 22 23 May 2010, 18:31
1 Choi : all other factors being equal, children whose parents 11 09 Nov 2008, 02:48
65 Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents 68 19 Jul 2008, 06:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.