It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 08:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Chris: Murderers should be sentenced to life in prison, not

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Chris: Murderers should be sentenced to life in prison, not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 07:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Chris: Murderers should be sentenced to life in prison, not subjected to the death penalty. A life sentence is enough to deter any convicted murderer from killing again. Moreover, even the worst offenders may subsequently undergo a miraculous rehabilitation—a possibility that is eliminated by the death penalty. The Bird Man of Alcatraz, a notorious convicted murderer, is a case in point. He raised canaries while in prison and ultimately became an acknowledged authority on the subject.
Dana: But the Bird Man of Alcatraz killed another inmate while in prison. What would you do to deter him from committing yet another murder—take away his birds?

Each of the following can be inferred from Chris’s argument EXCEPT:

(A) All convicted murderers will be deterred from killing again if given life sentences.
(B) Any convicted murderer could undergo a miraculous rehabilitation.
(C) The Bird Man of Alcatraz is an example of miraculous rehabilitation.
(D) The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter potential murderers.
(E) Becoming an acknowledged authority on canaries is evidence of one person’s rehabilitation.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 489

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 08:20
I think my answer would be D for this one.
A can be infered from: A life sentence is enough to deter any convicted murderer from killing again.

B can be infered from: Moreover, even the worst offenders may subsequently undergo a miraculous rehabilitation

C can be infered from: The Bird Man of Alcatraz, a notorious convicted murderer, is a case in point.

E can be infered from: Moreover, even the worst offenders may subsequently undergo a miraculous rehabilitation—a possibility that is eliminated by the death penalty. The Bird Man of Alcatraz, a notorious convicted murderer, is a case in point. He raised canaries while in prison and ultimately became an acknowledged authority on the subject.

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 467

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Location: united states
Re: CR - Life Sentence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 08:47
Andr359 wrote:
Chris: Murderers should be sentenced to life in prison, not subjected to the death penalty. A life sentence is enough to deter any convicted murderer from killing again. Moreover, even the worst offenders may subsequently undergo a miraculous rehabilitation—a possibility that is eliminated by the death penalty. The Bird Man of Alcatraz, a notorious convicted murderer, is a case in point. He raised canaries while in prison and ultimately became an acknowledged authority on the subject.
Dana: But the Bird Man of Alcatraz killed another inmate while in prison. What would you do to deter him from committing yet another murder—take away his birds?

Each of the following can be inferred from Chris’s argument EXCEPT:

(A) All convicted murderers will be deterred from killing again if given life sentences.
(B) Any convicted murderer could undergo a miraculous rehabilitation.
(C) The Bird Man of Alcatraz is an example of miraculous rehabilitation.
(D) The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter potential murderers.
(E) Becoming an acknowledged authority on canaries is evidence of one person’s rehabilitation.

D is the only choice that can be inferred from the passage.
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 123

GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V38
Re: CR - Life Sentence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 09:34
Quote:

D is the only choice that can be inferred from the passage.

Actually, the question is which cannot be inferred from Chris' argument. So since D is a choice that can be inferred, it is incorrect.

(A) All convicted murderers will be deterred from killing again if given life sentences. Obviously, not all convicted murderers will deter from killing again when given life sentences. The word "ALL" makes this the correct answer.

(B) Any convicted murderer could undergo a miraculous rehabilitation. Yes that is what Chris is trying to say. This can definitely be inferred.

(C) The Bird Man of Alcatraz is an example of miraculous rehabilitation. Yes he did give this example to show a rehabilitation.

(D) The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter potential murderers. Yes we can say that.

(E) Becoming an acknowledged authority on canaries is evidence of one person’s rehabilitation. Yes that's the assumption of his statement. This can also be an inference.

My answer is A.
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 123

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 489

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 09:45
I don't think D can be infered. The passage says The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter any convicted murders, and the answer choice D says about potential murders which the passage has never mentioned about. I still think D is the correct answer. Anyway, what is the offical answer to this question.

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 11:08
D can be inferred..Look at the sentence in the STEM "A life sentence is enough to deter any convicted murderer from killing again."

Look at D: The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter potential murderers

killing again=potential murderers

Hence D can be easily infered..

I go with A..Any is different from ALL

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: Life Sentence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 11:15
eileen1017 wrote:
I don't think D can be infered. The passage says The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter any convicted murders, and the answer choice D says about potential murders which the passage has never mentioned about. I still think D is the correct answer. Anyway, what is the offical answer to this question.

I agree with eileen

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 467

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Location: united states
Re: CR - Life Sentence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 12:59
gablaze23 wrote:
Quote:

D is the only choice that can be inferred from the passage.

Actually, the question is which cannot be inferred from Chris' argument. So since D is a choice that can be inferred, it is incorrect.

(A) All convicted murderers will be deterred from killing again if given life sentences. Obviously, not all convicted murderers will deter from killing again when given life sentences. The word "ALL" makes this the correct answer.

(B) Any convicted murderer could undergo a miraculous rehabilitation. Yes that is what Chris is trying to say. This can definitely be inferred.

(C) The Bird Man of Alcatraz is an example of miraculous rehabilitation. Yes he did give this example to show a rehabilitation.

(D) The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter potential murderers. Yes we can say that.

(E) Becoming an acknowledged authority on canaries is evidence of one person’s rehabilitation. Yes that's the assumption of his statement. This can also be an inference.

My answer is A.
What is the OA?

Guys, I am sorry. What I meant was D is the answer.

D is the only choice that can inferred as wrong.
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 123

GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V38

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 15:52

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 123

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Re: Life Sentence [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 18:50
eileen1017 wrote:
I don't think D can be infered. The passage says The threat of life imprisonment is adequate to deter any convicted murders, and the answer choice D says about potential murders which the passage has never mentioned about. I still think D is the correct answer. Anyway, what is the offical answer to this question.

Spot On!!!...D is the answer.

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 19:22
D by a mile.

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 19:38
Is it A?

- Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 734

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 20:01
A. All convicted murderers will be deterred from killing again if given life sentences.

Chris makes a general statement and that can not be misconstrued for 'all'.
A.

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jul 2007, 20:15
Correct. Should be D.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2007, 01:54
It should be 'A'.

'A' has gone too far as inference.

'All convicted murderers will be deterred from......'
Author never meant all convicted murderers.

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2007, 06:21
A ?......OA pls.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2007, 09:55
looks like a straight D to me

he says A life sentence is enough to deter any convicted murderer from killing again

ok so that infers all

D is never inferred because he is only talking about convicted killers not potential killers

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2007, 10:18
I think the answer is E.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

11 Jul 2007, 10:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Chris: Murderers should be sentenced to life in prison, not

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.