It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 336 [2], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2012, 04:38
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:08) correct 35% (01:12) wrong based on 334 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and high-nicotine cigarettes allows smokers to choose how much nicotine they want. However, a recent study has shown that the levels of nicotine found in the blood of smokers who smoke one pact of cigarettes per day are identical at the end of a day's worth of smoking, whatever the level of nicotine in the cigarettes they smoke.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the finding of nicotine study?

A. Blood cannot absorb more nicotine per day than that found in the smoke from a package of the lowest-nicotine cigarettes available.
B. Smokers of the lowest-nicotine cigarettes available generally smoke more cigarettes per day than smokers of high-nicotine cigarettes.
C. Most nicotine is absorbed into the blood of a smoker even if it is delivered in smaller quantities.
D. The level of tar in cigarettes is higher in low-nicotine cigarettes than it is in some high-nicotine cigarettes.
E. When taking in nicotine by smoking cigarettes is discontinued, the level of nicotine in the blood decreases steadily
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Last edited by getgyan on 29 Sep 2012, 02:48, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 336 [2], given: 269

Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 8

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04-21-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2012, 08:50
I would go in for B which says that by the end of the day the nicotine levels are same becuase ppl,who smoke low-nicotine cigarettes,end up smoking more cigarrattes
_________________

KPV

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 1961 [3], given: 6

Re: Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2012, 10:18
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
The answer is A. If blood cannot absorb more nicotine than what is found in the lowest nicotine cigarettes, there is no reason higher nicotine cigarettes should produce higher levels of nicotine in blood samples.

B is tempting, but is not correct; the stem already tells us the study *only* looked at people smoking exactly one pack per day. So the study controlled for the number of cigarettes smoked. C tells us that low-nicotine cigarettes still deliver nicotine, which does nothing to explain why there is no difference between low and high nicotine smokes. Tar is irrelevant, so D is wrong. The wording of E is completely unclear, so it's hard to even evaluate. If it were the case that nicotine levels dropped very quickly moments after smoking, then E would be a very good answer here too, since that would mean no one has high nicotine levels at the end of the day besides people who just smoked a cigarette; the nicotine level of cigarettes would be irrelevant. I don't think that's what the question writer meant by E, however, even though it could be interpreted that way.

Because the writing of the question is quite bad, it is a bit tricky to answer; in C the word 'it' should clearly refer back to 'nicotine' for example, and the wording of E is so imprecise that it's impossible to know exactly what it means. Where is the question from?
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 1961 [3], given: 6

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1978

Kudos [?]: 719 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2013, 11:13
IanStewart wrote:
The answer is A. If blood cannot absorb more nicotine than what is found in the lowest nicotine cigarettes, there is no reason higher nicotine cigarettes should produce higher levels of nicotine in blood samples.

B is tempting, but is not correct; the stem already tells us the study *only* looked at people smoking exactly one pack per day. So the study controlled for the number of cigarettes smoked. C tells us that low-nicotine cigarettes still deliver nicotine, which does nothing to explain why there is no difference between low and high nicotine smokes. Tar is irrelevant, so D is wrong. The wording of E is completely unclear, so it's hard to even evaluate. If it were the case that nicotine levels dropped very quickly moments after smoking, then E would be a very good answer here too, since that would mean no one has high nicotine levels at the end of the day besides people who just smoked a cigarette; the nicotine level of cigarettes would be irrelevant. I don't think that's what the question writer meant by E, however, even though it could be interpreted that way.

Because the writing of the question is quite bad, it is a bit tricky to answer; in C the word 'it' should clearly refer back to 'nicotine' for example, and the wording of E is so imprecise that it's impossible to know exactly what it means. Where is the question from?

Agree with you Ian, (B) is in fact very tempting because the fact that they smoke a pack per day does not mean that the number of cigarretes in the pack are the same. One could think otherwise, but if you just want to play it safe then yeah, A is your best choice

Cheers

Kudos [?]: 719 [0], given: 355

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10107

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2015, 16:07
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 897

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2017, 05:40
there is a similar question about nicotine and the smoker, but the answer is something that is more relevant to the option B in this question.
"identical" is the key word

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 865

Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and   [#permalink] 24 Jun 2017, 05:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Cigarette companies claim that manufacturing both low- and

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.