It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 20:33

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard;

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 52 [1], given: 0

Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 19:02
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

77% (00:50) correct 23% (00:56) wrong based on 101 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; therefore, governments should ban all advertisements that promote smoking.

Which one of the following principles, if established, mast strongly supports the argument?

(A) Advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health.
(C) Advertisements should disclose the health hazards associated with the products they promote.
(D) All products should conform to strict government health and safety standards.

Kudos [?]: 52 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 19:07
A?

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: Hong Kong

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 20:04
its between A or E ...

I will take E because assumption is that smoking is NOT healthful, and the conclusion it should be ban.

not confident thou..

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 20:23
I think its mostly E

(should be A or E
We can ignore A because it talks about people and nothing about products)

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Toronto

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 20:33
I vote for A)

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 582

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Chicago

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 22:53
I would go for A.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2005, 23:36
Between A and E, I go with A. The passage says advertisements that promote smoking should be banned. This goes to say the advertisement must have shown people smoking. The closest choice that goes with this line of argument is choice (A) which says advertisements should not be allowed to show things people doing things that endanger their health.

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 00:46
It should be A.
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 00:46
It should be A.
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 01:14
it is A.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 494 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

Location: MS

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 08:56
I would go with E .

The Passage does not say any thing about what's shown in the advertisements. "to show people doing things that endanger their health".

It makes the Conclusion that Goverment should ban the Cigrate Advertisement. Because the "Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard"

Am i going way south here ....? WHAT IS OA and Explanation?

Antmavel wrote:
Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; therefore, governments should ban all advertisements that promote smoking.

Which one of the following principles, if established, mast strongly supports the argument?

(A) Advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health.
(C) Advertisements should disclose the health hazards associated with the products they promote.
(D) All products should conform to strict government health and safety standards.

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 14:50
I would also choose A. Why E, what if there is a neutral product? (all others are out of scope)

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 17:41
no OE

OA is E

Actually in A it is said that advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health, but not that the product is healthy or not

You can sell insurance company services using an advertising campaign that show some people having some accidents, using stuntmen, in that case people endanger their heatlh but the product is sane and good.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 17:55
Antmavel wrote:
no OE

OA is E

Actually in A it is said that advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health, but not that the product is healthy or not

You can sell insurance company services using an advertising campaign that show some people having some accidents, using stuntmen, in that case people endanger their heatlh but the product is sane and good.

Wow!

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 19:16
Bhai wrote:
Antmavel wrote:
no OE

OA is E

Actually in A it is said that advertisements should not be allowed to show people doing things that endanger their health, but not that the product is healthy or not

You can sell insurance company services using an advertising campaign that show some people having some accidents, using stuntmen, in that case people endanger their heatlh but the product is sane and good.

Wow!

What's your meaning ? I've never said this campaign would be successfull

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 23:15
The clear assumption are

2) "governments should ban things, i.e. advertisements, if they cause a health hazard.

a) Out of scope
b) Out of scope
d) Out of scope
e) Out - Distorts the argument

I pick C because if advertisements reveal health hazards, then the government would know..... and therefore ban.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 433 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 23:54
E)...A) is out b/c it could be possible that the advertisement shows only the product without people. in this case the claim of the argument wouldn`t be supported b/c there would be no need to ban the ad. only E) adresses the problem in the right way.
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 433 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2012
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2012, 18:55
I picked A; however, after seeing the answer is E, I can both see why and argue it.

The passage talks about promoting smoking but A talks about actually showing people doing this health hazard thing called smoking.

But E is also kind of wrong because the passage states that the government should ban advertisements that promote smoking, which is a health hazard. Aka, a negative advertisement. And E goes on to say that advertisements should only promote healthful products. Aka, a positive.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2012, 02:33
Advertisements that promotes the health hazardous products should banned only so that the other health products may not suffer because of this.But this has been a serious issue because government has been getting lots of revenue from these products so that might be the main reason behind this that no adverts has been banned.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 11

Re: Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard; [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2012, 18:11
1
KUDOS
What is the source for this question? I think this is far from the GMAT reasoning style.. so be careful when you pick the source. I chose A, but E makes some sense too. I don't think this is a good one.

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 11

Re: Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a health hazard;   [#permalink] 05 Dec 2012, 18:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by