It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 10:12

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Olin (St. Louis) R1 | Tuck R1 | Ross R1 | Fuqua R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville s current city council

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1509

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville s current city council [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 05:28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

can you please explain your answer? appreciate it
thanks

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2007
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Please explain this to me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 07:04
tarek99 wrote:
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

can you please explain your answer? appreciate it
thanks



is the answer B?

this one is a toughy too :(

but B looks better than the other answers.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 120

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Please explain this to me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 07:10
tarek99 wrote:
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

can you please explain your answer? appreciate it
thanks


For the council's representation to change substantially, the incumbents must be voted out. This is possible only if other voters think differently than the author.
So, the answer should be A.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Please explain this to me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 09:20
tarek99 wrote:
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

can you please explain your answer? appreciate it
thanks


How about 'D' ?

One of the Premise says - 'Majority of the incumbents are running again' if the term doesn't expire to those who don't run for reelection then there is no way a substantial change can occur.

My second choice will be 'C'

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1509

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 11:44
This question is really mean. the OA is A.

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 628

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 18:08
tarek99 wrote:
This question is really mean. the OA is A.


Can you please share the source of this CR... Looks like I have to work hard on my CRs.. :cry:

After a close look at the options, 'A' makes sense

Lets describe it with some examples..:idea: :idea:

X, y & Z are members since 2005. Since they are already serving the neighborhood they are likely to have the best experience in serving the interests of the neighborhood.

If all the voters think the same as the author, then there is a high chance that x, y & Z can be reelected. At least some of the voters should think otherwise to bring a substantial change.

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 18:43
ah i was going for D as well.

Now I see why it is A. If all other voters make the same exception for their regions incumbents as the other citizen does, then they will all re-elect the incumbents, and therefore the makeup of the council does not change

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 2

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2553

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Please explain this to me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2007, 22:03
tarek99 wrote:
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

can you please explain your answer? appreciate it
thanks


A. b/c if the other voters dont do this then the citizens plan is ruined.

B: irrelevant really. Not all the voters need to vote, just not all who vote, vote for their own incumbents.

C:irrelevant

D:irrelevant
E: way out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 702 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Please explain this to me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2007, 07:48
[quote="tarek99"]Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville’s current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council’s membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council’s membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the challengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville’s city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

If A is true, it is possible that someone will vote for the candidate who represents the neighborhood we are talking about. So the council would change

Kudos [?]: 702 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1509

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Dec 2007, 10:42
i got this from 1000CR attachment

Kudos [?]: 1073 [0], given: 1

  [#permalink] 22 Dec 2007, 10:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville s current city council

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.