Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:14 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:14

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 470
Own Kudos [?]: 2377 [14]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 350 [2]
Given Kudos: 112
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 548 [3]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
3
Kudos
After a lot of POE, B it is.

The conclusion is:

thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

B said:

bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond

The city hoped to build the schools with a lot of revenues. B points out a reason that the revenues will not be as much as the city expected.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 149
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Chicago, IL
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
1
Kudos
nusmavrik wrote:
This one is strange. What do you think guys?

City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects. Because the interest paid to the bond holder is tax-exempt, municipal bonds are an attractive investment. So, to pay for the five state-of-the-art school buildings needed to accommodate our growing student population, Northopolis should issue a ten-year, $200 million bond, thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the likelihood that the bond issue recommended above will have the result that is claimed?
(A) Most Northopolis citizens would be reluctant to support a tax increase to pay for new school buildings.
(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.
(C) Many popular investments are created by pooling state and municipal bonds to create tax-exempt index funds.
(D) Estimates of the cost of five new school buildings vary from well below $200 million to well above $200 million.
(E) A significant percentage of municipal bonds issued by cities such as Northopolis are purchased by investors from other cities who aim to diversify their bond portfolios.


Seems like the argument is based on the assumption that a $200 million bond is not significant enough to cause any changes in an expending tax base. However, B states the the possibility that this bond issue can severly affect the city's tax revenues in either positive or negative ways. In case of the latter, A bond issue can even preclude a tax revenue base from expanding making the bond issue really inattractive as a financing alternative.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 116
Own Kudos [?]: 124 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
3
Kudos
(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.

Because, the interest earned on the municipal bonds is tax-exempt, eventually government is losing that money and causing the tax revenues to decrease.

Hence B for me.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Posts: 421
Own Kudos [?]: 2976 [1]
Given Kudos: 630
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
This question is from GMAT HACKS daily question of the day archive. I'm not sure when this question originally appeared on Jeff Sackmann's site but it reappeared on March 19, 2013. Here is the link to the question from 2013 https://www.gmathacks.com/daily/20130319-gmat-question-of-the-day.html.

The Official Explanation is as follows:

Answer: B This is a weaken question. The argument makes a rather odd claim. Much of the passage concerns the benefits of municipal bonds, including a suggesting that Northopolis issue such a bond. Then the conclusion is that the city will pay for new school buildings with tax revenues. Money from bond issues is not the same thing, so it's unclear what one has to do with the other. To weaken the argument, that distinction--the assumption that issuing a bond will somehow increase tax revenues--must be made clear. Consider each choice:

(A) This is irrelevant, as it doesn't address either the bond issue or the effect of "reluctance" on tax revenues. (B) This is correct. It relates the existence of the proposed bond issue to tax revenues, which would decrease as a result of the bond issue. (C) This is irrelevant, as it doesn't address tax revenues. (D) Again, this choice is irrelevant; the cost of the buildings is not what the conclusion of the argument is about. (E) This is outside of the scope. If anything, it weakens the argument by suggesting that the bond issue will not have a direct impact on local finances.

NOTE: I added additional Tags to the question as there was only one field used.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Could someone please breakdown B vs E?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2016
Posts: 64
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [0]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V30
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Even though I got the correct answer. But still need to validate my understanding here. The conclusion is that City will pay for its schools with revenues from expanding tax base. But since, these bond's interest is tax free, they might not serve the purpose. Which is mentioned in B
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Expert Reply
pafrompa wrote:
Could someone please breakdown B vs E?


Your query has been well explained by ankujgupta in the above post.

E is irrelevant, because it does not relate to tax. Moreover, this option states a strength of such bonds, whereas the correct option should mention a weakness (specifically, related to tax).
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2015
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 127 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 520 Q44 V17
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 710 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.45
WE:Research (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
could you please elaborate more why option B is correct?
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Expert Reply
askul2389 wrote:
could you please elaborate more why option B is correct?


Option B states that the bond interest is tax-exempt. Therefore this option states a point against the argument based on "paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base". Thus B is correct. (The two underlined portions oppose each other.)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools: ISB '18
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
2
Kudos
sayantanc2k wrote:
askul2389 wrote:
could you please elaborate more why option B is correct?


Option B states that the bond interest is tax-exempt. Therefore this option states a point against the argument based on "paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base". Thus B is correct. (The two underlined portions oppose each other.)


I agree on this but one thing that is confusing is that the statement " the bond interest is tax-exempt" is mentioned in the premise of the argument and not introduced newly in the option B.

Also, the conclusion about paying for the buildings from an expanding tax base dos not follow from the premises in the argument as the argument clearly states that the bond interest is tax free .

How does B weaken the argument if the tax free point is already mentioned in the premise of the argument ??
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sakshamgmat wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
askul2389 wrote:
could you please elaborate more why option B is correct?


Option B states that the bond interest is tax-exempt. Therefore this option states a point against the argument based on "paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base". Thus B is correct. (The two underlined portions oppose each other.)


I agree on this but one thing that is confusing is that the statement " the bond interest is tax-exempt" is mentioned in the premise of the argument and not introduced newly in the option B.

Also, the conclusion about paying for the buildings from an expanding tax base dos not follow from the premises in the argument as the argument clearly states that the bond interest is tax free .

How does B weaken the argument if the tax free point is already mentioned in the premise of the argument ??


The passage uses the part "tax exempt" to show why there would be more buyers and then concludes (wrongly) that more buyers would mean increase in tax base (absolutely ignoring the first cause-effect relation): tax exempt---> more buyers ---> increase in tax base.

Option B shows the problem in the above argument, showing that the same feature "tax exempt" would not help increase the tax base.

(Cannot say that this is a very high quality GMAT-like question.)
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [1]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
this question is not hard to understand, and nothing is strange here.
Nevertheless, test takers will not use outside knowledge or any analytic skills for this question.
Here is an idea: growing population -> more tax revenues for the city. However, people want tax exempt -> put in munical investment -> the fund is used to build the school.

For gmat, C,D,E are all out of scope.
In A, people from other parts of the world still buy the bonds, and there is no need to increase the tax to build the school. B is left.
THe argument structure is clear even though the structure is confusing.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 169
Own Kudos [?]: 991 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Yes, B is the answer.
the argument says that "because of expanding tax base, people will hold bonds, and also the city will receive more tax revenues; as a result, the city will have the fund to build the school."
B points out that "that many people choose to hold bond will negatively affect the tax revenues"
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17220
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne