Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 Feb 2017, 02:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 51

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 00:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (02:19) correct 59% (01:28) wrong based on 111 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

1. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

2. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

3. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

4. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

5. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 21:28
E might be wrong for two reasons:
1.was neither prestigious nor was often played:neither nor will not take two uses of 'was', and also it should be- was neither prestigious nor played often.
2. It seems to say he was won over by the guitar precisely in mid-20th century, by the use of 'when he was won over' rather than 'after he was won over'
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 220 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

08 Mar 2011, 21:36
exactly , 'was neither prestigious nor was often played' is wrong .

'was neither prestigious nor often played' is right

'neither was prestigious nor was often played' , i want to know whether this usage is correct ?
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2011, 08:19
C is a clear winner.
Garima,
'neither was prestigious nor was often played' is correct for the reason,
1. Neither nor is a correlative conjunction, and connects grammatically equal parts.
Here both are predicates.

Hope this helps.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3703
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 733

Kudos [?]: 5743 [0], given: 322

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2011, 08:55
Choices A, B and E are out at first sight for the lack //ism in the use of correlative conjunction. Choice D faults on using the conjunction ‘nor’ without ‘neither’. In addition D is wrong on using an active voice on one side of the conjunction ‘nor’ and a passive voice on the other side.
C survives
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Location: San Francisco, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2011, 11:52
I chose B. But I see why the "having" phrase is problematic. Usually the "having" modifies a person immediately after a comma. I just didn't like the two "was not" and so avoided c...
Current Student
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 34

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2014, 23:17
Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often   [#permalink] 13 Sep 2014, 23:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
39 Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 20 07 Jan 2013, 07:38
1 Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 12 09 Mar 2010, 03:48
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 11 14 Oct 2009, 05:43
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 3 11 Aug 2008, 14:34
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 8 10 May 2008, 23:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by