Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 09:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 116
Location: USA
Schools: IU KSB
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 88 [1] , given: 66

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2009, 13:25
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

35% (02:21) correct 65% (01:31) wrong based on 1786 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

1. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

2. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

3. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

4. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

5. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

Difficulty level 700-800

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by swatirpr on 05 Dec 2009, 12:29, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2010
Posts: 100
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 30

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2010, 14:10
IMO 'C'

1]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
2]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
Incorrect modifier in (1) and (2)
3]Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.-Correct
4]Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.Not Parallel
5]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me a kudos. THANKS!

SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1511
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 630 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

01 Jun 2010, 18:37
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

1. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

2. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

3. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

4. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

5. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
GMAT 1: 700 Q43 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 67 [5] , given: 29

Re: Usage of Having been with example [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2013, 09:43
5
KUDOS
This is a good question.

The answer is C because it is the only one where the second half of the sentence correctly modifies something. Here is why the other choices are incorrect:

A is incorrect because having been is modifying the 20th century. The 20th century cannot be won over by anything. That makes no logical sense. Only living things can be won over. For example, one could say "Patricia was won over by the lovely flowers John gave her." The 20th century or the flowers from my example cannot be won over.

B is similar to A.

D is incorrect because of the first part of the sentence. I do not think classical guitar can be performed. It can be played, but not performed. This was a tricky one, but C is better.

E is incorrect because there should be an "it" before often.

I hope that helps
_________________

If my post helped you, please consider giving me kudos.

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2013
Posts: 99
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-28-2014
GPA: 3.86
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 23

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2013, 22:54
C is correct !!

A) is incorrect bcoz of wrong usage of idiom Neither X nor y as in correct Gmat sentece, in this idiom X & Y must be parallel to each other & in actual sentence Prestigious (Adjective) is not parallel to Played (verb), hence A is out.

Same is with B & E

Now left with C & D :

D - wrong idiomatic usage it must be neither X or Y while in actual sentence usage is not X nor Y.

Left with C : Checking C - Parallelism OK as was not prestigious & was not often played.
He - pronoun clearly refer to Anderia
Seems OK thus C
_________________

G-prep1 540 --> Kaplan 580-->Veritas 640-->MGMAT 590 -->MGMAT 2 640 --> MGMAT 3 640 ---> MGMAT 4 650 -->MGMAT 5 680 -- >GMAT prep 1 570

Give your best shot...rest leave upto Mahadev, he is the extractor of all negativity in the world !!

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 289
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-27-2012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 44

Re: Revision Project: Classical guitar was neither prestigious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2015, 08:28
A. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

B. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

C. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

D. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

E. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

B seems best.
_________________
_________________

kudos me if you like my post.

Attitude determine everything.
all the best and God bless you.

Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2015, 18:26
The correct idiom is was neither ... nor .... (do not repeat 'was' because neither is the trigger word)

1]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. wrong idiom -->incorrect

2]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. correct use of idiom, but 'its' is incorrect, it refers to 'sound' but 'its' cannot reach inside the instrument's sound--> incorrect

3]Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity. correct use of idiom, make it clear what possesses relative obscurity ---> correct OA

4]Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. wrong idiom --> incorrect

5]Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument. wrong idiom, shift the meaning of the last sentence. The last sentence means he won by the sound although the guitar's sound has 1 disadvantage, which is the relative obscurity. He did not win by the disadvantage---> incorrect
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 98
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 36

Re: #Top150 SC: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2016, 04:08
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

Option is (E) is attractive . However it has parallelism error which is subtle
It repeats the helping verb 'was' , but the first verb was outside the Neither/Nor construction and second verb is inside the construction. This should not be the case. Either verb should be outside the construction or the verb should be in side the construction twice.

(D) is wrong for many reasons as daagh explained.

(A) and (B) can be eliminated for use of having , which is not modifying anything

_________________

The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.

Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 43
Location: Brazil
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V38
GMAT 2: 700 Q47 V38
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 33

Re: Revision Project: Classical guitar was neither prestigious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2016, 16:02
Tricky one!

A. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. ITS makes the sentence unclear

B. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. ITS makes the sentence unclear

C. Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity. CORRECT: First part is parallel and it is clear that the obscurity comes from the instrument.

D. Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. ITS makes the sentence unclear

E. Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument. First part is not parallel.
Manager
Status: In the realms of Chaos & Night
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 172
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 94

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2016, 11:29
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity. [/u]

A Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
B Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
C Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
D Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
E Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.
_________________

Good luck
=========================================================================================
"If a street performer makes you stop walking, you owe him a buck"
"If this post helps you on your GMAT journey, drop a +1 Kudo "

"Thursdays with Ron - Consolidated Verbal Master List - Updated"

Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 76
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 100

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2017, 04:48
Aristocrat wrote:
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

A Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
B Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
C Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
D Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
E Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

In this problem we have modifier and parallelism problems. In A and B the main incorrect thing is the modifier ",having been won over" this Verb-ing modifier, modifies the whole clause before. This does not make really sense, since the meaning of the sentence wants us to modifiy Andres Segovia. Furthermore we have parallelism problems which are already mentioned in the posts above. D uses "nor" which is not allowed without "neither"
Manager
Status: GMAT Coach
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 119
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 12

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2017, 06:58
asdfghjklasdfghj wrote:
Aristocrat wrote:
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

A Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
B Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
C Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
D Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
E Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

In this problem we have modifier and parallelism problems. In A and B the main incorrect thing is the modifier ",having been won over" this Verb-ing modifier, modifies the whole clause before. This does not make really sense, since the meaning of the sentence wants us to modifiy Andres Segovia. Furthermore we have parallelism problems which are already mentioned in the posts above. D uses "nor" which is not allowed without "neither"

D uses "nor" which is not allowed without "neither"

"Nor" can be used without "neither" the same as "or" can be used without "either", or "and" can be used without "both".

D is wrong for other reasons:

"Nor" is introducing an independent clause, so it must be preceded by a comma.
Classical guitar did not have prestige ,nor was it performed ...
If "it" is eliminated, it becomes part of the first clause and the comma is not needed.
Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was performed...

The position of the modifier "in the mid-twentieth century" changes the original meaning.
Original meaning:
Classical guitar was revived in the mid-twentieth century.
New meaning:
Andres Segovia was won over in the mid-twentieth century
_________________

Clipper Ledgard
GMAT Coach

Manager
Status: GMAT Coach
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 119
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 12

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2017, 15:02
asdfghjklasdfghj wrote:
Aristocrat wrote:
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

A Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
B Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor played often in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
C Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.
D Classical guitar did not have prestige nor was it performed often in concert halls until its revival by Andres Segovia, who in the mid-twentieth century was won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.
E Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, when he was won over by the sound of the relatively obscure instrument.

In this problem we have modifier and parallelism problems. In A and B the main incorrect thing is the modifier ",having been won over" this Verb-ing modifier, modifies the whole clause before. This does not make really sense, since the meaning of the sentence wants us to modifiy Andres Segovia. Furthermore we have parallelism problems which are already mentioned in the posts above. D uses "nor" which is not allowed without "neither"

Keeping the original meaning is essential, unless the meaning in the original sentence is nonsensical. If the meaning does not make sense, we must interpret the authors intention. In this case the original meaning makes sense, even more than in D.

The GMAT does not ask specifically about punctuation, but the sentence must be correct, including punctuation.
_________________

Clipper Ledgard
GMAT Coach

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 31
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [3] , given: 7

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 00:05
3
KUDOS
AR15J wrote:
Hi GMATNinja,

I win
He won the match
I will win

The match was won by me

All above sentences are correct.

Hey AR15J !

This sentences uses the phrasal verb "win over". You can read briefly about phrasal verbs in general here: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/phrasal-verb and about the particular phrasal verb "win over" here: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/win-sb-over?q=win+over.

However, I would not be overly concerned with understanding and learning a list of phrasal verbs for the exam. What I would focus on is how the meaning is being conveyed. So, let me illustrate the same with the help of an example.

1. I was won over by her intelligence. - Passive
2. Her intelligence won me over. - Active

As you can see, the meaning conveyed by both the sentences is the same. I was impressed (the actual meaning of win-over is more specific, but I am keeping it simple here) by her intelligence or Her intelligence impressed me. The only difference is the passive and active construction. This is exactly what happens in the correct choice.

Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often played in concert halls until it was revived by Andres Segovia in the mid-twentieth century, having been won over by the instrument's sound despite its relative obscurity.

C) Classical guitar was not prestigious and was not often played in concert halls until Andres Segovia revived it in the mid-twentieth century, after he was won over by the sound despite the instrument's relative obscurity.

The portion after the comma in the correct choice basically intends to communicate that the sound of the instrument won over Andres. It is just written in the passive form.

Hope this helps!

Cheers!
Manager
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 215
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 32

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2017, 19:23
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Re: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often   [#permalink] 19 Apr 2017, 19:23
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
#Top150 SC: Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 0 09 Feb 2016, 04:08
Revision Project: Classical guitar was neither prestigious 0 02 Mar 2017, 12:55
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 0 09 Mar 2017, 23:06
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 0 12 Oct 2015, 18:26
Classical guitar was neither prestigious nor was often 0 25 Oct 2014, 20:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by