Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 21 Jul 2019, 13:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 158
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 01 Apr 2018, 01:24
11
16
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:50) correct 43% (01:41) wrong based on 601 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the state. In 2004, nearly 60% of all precipitation in our state was in the form of snow, whereas by 2009 that percentage had dropped to just 42%. At this rate, in 20-30 years the state may have no snow at all.

The climatologist’s argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) The percentages he cites will continue to decrease at a linear rate.

(B) Global warming will cease to be a factor in the state’s snowfall yields over the next 20-30 years.

(C) Global warming is not the only factor affecting the state’s snowfall yields over the past decade.

(D) The amount of precipitation in the state in 2009 was not significantly greater than it had been in 2004.

(E) The volume of rainfall, the other primary form of precipitation in the state, was not higher in 2004 than it was in 2009.

_________________
Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Originally posted by akhil911 on 19 Apr 2014, 01:15.
Last edited by hazelnut on 01 Apr 2018, 01:24, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 158
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2014, 01:16
13
1
1
Solution

D. This question tests a data flaw that occurs commonly throughout the GMAT – just because the percentage that snow constitutes of the total precipitation has gone down DOES NOT mean that the actual volume of snowfall has gone down.

If overall precipitation has doubled, for example, then snowfall has gone up, from 60/100 to 84/200. D exposes this flaw – if you negate D it says “the volume of precipitation in 2009 was significantly greater than it was in 2004”, evidence that the total precipitation could well have dramatically increased.

Note the flaws in trap answers A and E – in A, the continued trend doesn’t need to be linear; in fact if it were exponential that would strengthen the conclusion even further.

And choice E actually does the opposite of D – if negated, E says “there was more rainfall in 2004 than in 2009”, showing that overall precipitation (and therefore snowfall) was way down in 2009.
_________________
Kudos me if you like my post !!!!
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 47
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2017, 09:13
2
This question actually is quite tricky..but let's BOIL it down first

% Snow decreased from 60% in 2004 to 42% in 2009. If this trend continues, we'll have no snow around 2030.

Now the easy part is recognizing that all of this is %..so there's probably a number vs. % trick somewhere. But the slightly harder part is recognizing that no snow = 0 NOT 0%.
Took me a while to get that..but after you get that.....it should be obvious what the answer is: If there were 100 units of snow in 2004, and 1000 unit of snow in 2009 then and 10000000000000 units of snow in 2030 then even if we have 1% of snow.....that's enough to construct the Great Wall of Hockey Rings.

For completion, I'm going to do a list.

A. The percentages he cites will continue to decrease at a linear rate.
Negate: Even if it decreases in a parabolic shape.....we can still get to 0.
B. Global warming will cease to be a factor in the state’s snowfall yields over the next 20-30 years.
This counteracts the evidence in the statement, thus obviously cannot be an assumption.
C. Global warming is not the only factor affecting the state’s snowfall yields over the past decade.
Sure there are other factors, demographics, technology, potential warfare, ecology...but they may or may not affect the downtrend.
D. The amount of precipitation in the state in 2009 was not significantly greater than it had been in 2004.
=> What we were looking for, Bingo!
E. The volume of rainfall, the other primary form of precipitation in the state, was not higher in 2004 than it was in 2009.
Learning about rainfall is cute, but we can do that outside the GMAT. :D
_________________
Insanity at its finest.
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2013
Posts: 124
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2017, 10:30
1
D definitely. Global warming is about the "amount" of snowfall. However, the facts that have been given to us are about the percentage. So, we have to reconcile.

Percentage of snowall = amount of snowfall / total amount of precipitation

So, amount of snowfall = Percentage of snowfall*total amount of precipitation

Percentage of snowall has decreased betwen 2004 and 2009. Conclusion is that "amount of snowfall" has decreased.

But what if total amount of precipitation in 2009 has increased significantly? Then, just because Percentage of snowfall has decreased, we can't conclude that amount of snowfall has decreased.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1212
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2017, 08:20
1
Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the state. In 2004, nearly 60% of all precipitation in our state was in the form of snow, whereas by 2009 that percentage had dropped to just 42%. At this rate, in 20-30 years the state may have no snow at all.

The climatologist’s argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

A. The percentages he cites will continue to decrease at a linear rate. -We don't know whether the percentage "will" continue to decrease
B. Global warming will cease to be a factor in the state’s snowfall yields over the next 20-30 years. -We are not worried about the factor
C. Global warming is not the only factor affecting the state’s snowfall yields over the past decade. -We are not worried about the factor
D. The amount of precipitation in the state in 2009 was not significantly greater than it had been in 2004. -Correct
E. The volume of rainfall, the other primary form of precipitation in the state, was not higher in 2004 than it was in 2009. -Other source is out of scope
_________________
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2018
Posts: 51
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2018, 18:12
Premise: Percentage of precipitation significantly dropped from 2004 to 2009

Conclusion: In 20-30 years there may be no snow at all in the state.

Option D: The amount of precipitation in the state in 2009 was not significantly greater than it had been in 2004.

Negating the above statement undermines the conclusion by saying that, though percentage is low, the actual amount of precipitation is significantly higher. Hence one cannot say there may not be snow at all in 20-30 years. So D is the right assumption for this argument.

Just restarted my GMAT life. KUDOs please
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 332
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2019, 18:05
Could someone please explain why option E is incorrect? If negated, the entire conclusion breaks down
Re: Climatologist: Global warming is affecting snowfall throughout the   [#permalink] 23 Mar 2019, 18:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by